Fold or shove spot.
I say shove. You can't build a pot that's such a substantial percent of your stack, and then fold KK to a single raise that may not indicate anything stronger than top pair. Villain could have a set or AA, but he could also have QQ or any of a large number of Jx combinations (and perhaps a smattering of smaller pairs, and he doesn't believe you have an overpair). Those possibilities together dwarf the short list of hands that beat you.
Further, given the "Tends to trap" part of V1's bio, a set is less likely than the combinatorics would indicate. The flop is totally dry, except for a straight draw that no reasonable preflop 3-bet would hit. This is a Trap House in the Trappist's Cove neighborhood of Traptown, dead middle of Trapper County. Trappers salivate at the idea of flopping a set on a board like this.
Of course, "Tends to trap" could also mean he's more likely than usual to have AA here. But there are 6 AA combos and 9 total set combos,
and trapping with sets makes more sense than trapping with AA, so I'm weighing this more in favor of him not trapping in this spot.
And in any case, everything I said above stands regardless of his trapping tendencies. The pot's too big and your hand's too strong to slink away with your tail between your legs. That one raise isn't enough to justify folding KK here, and if you're not folding, shoving is the only move that makes sense.
I'll call here and evaluate turn.
Sorry boltonguy, but this is the worst approach you could possibly take.
As of the flop, Hero has the second-highest available overpair. If Hero calls the raise, the pot will be $75.50, and Hero will have $48.89 (not quite 65% of the pot) left in his stack. What is there to evaluate after that point?
Nothing, really. You should never leave yourself with that little, relative to the pot size, and still consider folding. The flop raise was the last, most meaningful piece of information you're getting about Villain's hand. There's no further action he can take that will define it better than he already has. The only thing you're leaving yourself room for is (a) to get scared by the turn card or (b) to convince yourself that his inevitable, no-brainer shove on the turn means he had you beat on the flop the whole time. Otherwise you have to call.
I could see a case for calling here
if and only if Villain is a habitual bluffer who will reliably stack off with a weak hand as long as you remain passive. But then the plan is to flat the raise and check-call regardless of the turn—and it's a decent board for that line, just not the right opponent. (I could also see an argument for calling and then shoving the turn with these stack sizes, though I don't think it's a good play here.)
Calling with any other intention is madness. The flop raise is the pot-commitment threshold. If you'd call the raise on that flop and then give even the slightest consideration to folding on the turn, that's a pretty big leak.