dkersey
Straight
Looks like he skipped town. Wherever he went, he better be prepared to stay there a loooooooong time. I wonder what he did for a day job...if he had one. He's totally screwed if this was his primary source of income.
It’s a matter of time before he starts a kickstarter group buy![]()
Looks like he skipped town. Wherever he went, he better be prepared to stay there a loooooooong time. I wonder what he did for a day job...if he had one. He's totally screwed if this was his primary source of income.
Mac VerStandig, attorney for the plaintiffs, then made his own attempt to serve Postle with the summons.
The whole bizarre story is worth a read, but according to VerStandig, he approached Postle's residence in California and spent several minutes attempting to ring the doorbell and knocking on the door, eliciting no response. Rather than leave, VerStandig said he surveilled the place until spotting Postle inside, at which point he resumed ultimately unsuccessful attempts to serve the paperwork.
VerStandig also reported attempting to reach Postle through his criminal defense attorney, which also proved fruitless.
Read the article and someone says they watched the place when attempting to serve him papers and noticed he was inside, but he just wouldn't answer the door.
I didn't learn anything other than he don't have a lawyer yet.. lol
In addition to Postle being in the line of fire, he had to have had an accomplice. There has been a ton of analysis on the cheating technique(s). Has the accomplice been identified? I know the person hasn't confessed but it seems like the people closest to this would be able to figure out the accomplice. And whoever that is, shouldn't that person be sued/prosecuted as well?
The accomplice was the tournament director.
While Justin was either privy of it, or potentially in on it, I believe there is a decent amount of evidence to support Taylor @thevocalterror May have been his source inside, as he ran the tech for most of the livestream games and helped setup/maintain a lot of the rfid and stream equipment.Yep, TD Justin Kuraitis is the likely co-conspirator.
He hasn't tweeted since August 2019, when this all blew up. And it appears he's still working at Stones while the investigation continues.
I agree with Taylor, I'll never forget the hand the cards were switched out. Fat train kept asking Taylor what postle had.While Justin was either privy of it, or potentially in on it, I believe there is a decent amount of evidence to support Taylor @thevocalterror May have been his source inside, as he ran the tech for most of the livestream games and helped setup/maintain a lot of the rfid and stream equipment.
I’ve played at stones 3-4times and Justin has been absent every time I’ve been there, with an alternate manager serving as tourney director, word is he’s on “indefinite leave”
That's how you know it's a tough jobTheir attorney -
View attachment 399631
This must be a CA law right? Borgata sure sued Ivey for his baccarat winnings in NJI read the whole decision... It does not argue whether Postle did or did not cheat.
It argues that California law does not allow people to sue over gambling losses. And that the parties didn’t properly argue their case in various ways.
It does allow them to refile and try again, but only for the rake that Stones took, not for Postle’s winnings or other damages.
The law is often frustrating like this... Many cases get decided on procedure and technicalities, so that the judge never has to address the substance of the issue.
This must be a CA law right? Borgata sure sued Ivey for his baccarat winnings in NJ
Maybe Borgata had legal standing to bring suit that individuals do not have, along the lines of what @justsomedude said above.This must be a CA law right? Borgata sure sued Ivey for his baccarat winnings in NJ
The decision to dismiss for postle cited “speculative damages” being the issue, not the skill vs chance.Obviously im not a lawyer....
So can someone explain it like im 5 how being cheated in a game is a "Gambling Loss'?
Also, i could understand if gambling was prohibited in that state. I remember the case of a waitress being sued by coworkers for not sharing a lottery ticket. Restaurant in a state with no gambling/ lottery. Sooner courts refused to listen to case.
I don’t know much about gambling laws or anything about California law, but one thing I read is that the damages are theoretical.Obviously im not a lawyer....
So can someone explain it like im 5 how being cheated in a game is a "Gambling Loss'?
Also, i could understand if gambling was prohibited in that state. I remember the case of a waitress being sued by coworkers for not sharing a lottery ticket. Restaurant in a state with no gambling/ lottery. Sooner courts refused to listen to case.