Casino Chip Madness 2017: Best Casino Inlay of All Time - Nomination Thread (1 Viewer)

Speak your truth

  • I love chips - let's do this

    Votes: 19 48.7%
  • I wish we were doing best single casino chip instead of best inlay

    Votes: 7 17.9%
  • Stop with the effing polls

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I don't participate in threads that don't have politard content

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Merry Christmas

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Happy Hanukkah

    Votes: 1 2.6%
  • Kiss my ass

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Kiss your ass

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Kiss his ass

    Votes: 6 15.4%
  • O'Doyle rules

    Votes: 6 15.4%

  • Total voters
    39

jbutler

Royal Flush
Joined
Oct 28, 2014
Messages
10,669
Reaction score
10,756
Around this time last year we did Casino Chip Madness 2016 to determine the best full set of casino chips of all time and came away with the relatively uncontroversial Mapes as the winner. They were and are particularly popular right now, but I think they were a deserving set (final voting thread here).

Before that, in Custom Chip Madness 2014, back on ChipTalk, we did the greatest all time single custom chip (not set) and awarded the honor to @Redbelly's beautiful - and at the time groundbreaking - T25k (final voting thread here)

And I believe the first Custom Chip Madness was in 2012, also on ChipTalk, when we voted for the greatest all time custom chip set and determined, at least at that moment in time, that the Duy's Palace set by @viet rounder was the GOAT (final voting thread here).

So for CCM 2017, let's do another Casino Chip Madness, but this time we aren't looking at the full set. This time we're judging inlay design only. So no matter how many flashy high denom chips a casino might have, they're still competing on the same level playing field as some podunk riverboat casino in the midwest.

The only qualification is that the inlay must have been designed and chips must have been produced with the intent to operate a legal, commercial gaming establishment. So PNYs are eligible even though the casino never opened, but The Bank chips from Ocean's Thirteen are ineligible because the casino was fictional and the set I just designed for my old game in Jersey are ineligible because they are not used in a legal, regulated gaming establishment.

The process will be a standard sweet 16 bracket. Everyone will list their top ten in no particular order in this thread and I'll take everyone's nominations and seed the sweet 16 according to the support each set gets in this thread.

The deadline for submission of top tens will be Monday, January 16, 2017 at 12pm, EST. Rules for posting your top tens are below. Please see in particular number 5. Photos are not required, but are HIGHLY encouraged. When someone just says "Bellagio" I don't know if they mean first or second edition. For the sake of clarity in order to get your nominations counted, please use photos.

(1) All your nominations must be in the same post. Your first post to include any nominations will be your only post counted, so continue to edit it if you have to add/remove later. No nominations posted in second or third posts will be counted unless they are also edited into your first nomination list in this thread. Feel free to post plenty otherwise advocating for sets - just limit your nominations to one post.
(2) You are limited to 10 nominations. If you list more than 10, only the first 10 listed will be counted.
(3) Any list posted or edited after the above stated deadline is void and will not be counted.
(4) Nominations must be for certain casinos and certain editions of chips. So if someone nominates the Dunes, they must specify the edition that they intend to nominate and that edition's inlay will be nominated.
(5) You are VERY much encouraged to post a photo or scan of each of your nominated inlays. Doing so guarantees I will know which inlay you intend to nominate so I can properly tally the nominations. ChipGuide is your friend. I will do my level best to figure out which you mean, but I won't go chasing you down for clarification, so please post a photo.​

Not necessarily a rule you need to worry about, but a note on voting thread procedure: even though this is an inlay-only vote, it would be silly to try to post a photo of an inlay without the surrounding chip. IMO you need that context to understand how the inlay works in relation to the chip.

For voting threads all head-to-head competitions will feature one photo of each chip (or two if the chip has alternating sides). I will use photos of $1 chips for all sets for voting threads so as to further control for spot level, color, etc. as much as reasonably possible. If a set has no $1 chip (very rare), I will use the lowest available denomination higher than $1. If a set has different inlays for all denominations (PNY, Ritz, Bahamia, etc.), I will still only post one photo (or two if alternating sides) in the OP. People are free to add whatever photos they would like in the thread, of course, but I feel that a one chip to one chip comparison is the best way to handle the voting OPs.

The bracket will proceed in one week intervals. Nominations will close on Monday, January 16. The Sweet Sixteen will be posted that night with voting to conclude on Monday, January 23. Same procedure for the Elite Eight with voting to conclude on Monday, January 30. Then the Final Four ending on Monday, February 6, and a champion crowned at the close of the Main Event round on Monday, February 13.
 
Tough to whittle it down and I'm sure I'll be doing some editing once folks remind me of some I forgot, but for now these are mine in alphabetical order:

Bird Cage:

Y0xjvFZ.png


Boulder Club:

l5n8xTa.png


Bucket of Blood:

EtRAdvA.png


Caesar's (Atlantic City):

qtsN0FA.png


Dunes:

sk8mJoa.png


Ho-Chunk (Wisconsin Dells):

D1MVK5y.png


Kings Castle:

Voa2dIC.png


Last Frontier:

f6a4XTa.png
BidLtXH.png


Mirage:

7DgNo3K.png


Sahara:

g77cCUo.png
 
Last edited:

Good news is that the Parx chips are quickly climbing a top ten list.

Bad news is that list is top ten live casino chips that look like they would give you AIDS.

Further good news is that in October the Taj closed, so the number one spot that had been locked for years is finally free.
 
old bellagio inlay
06509.jpg

hacienda, las vegas
061004.jpg

commercial hotel, elko
162595.jpg

Colorado belle, closed version, laughlin
17017.jpg

nevada lodge\club
125543.jpg

The Palace
20892.jpg

cactus Pete's
19414.jpg

more to come
 
Last edited:
I can't be bothered to think about ten inlays, let alone post pics of them, I'll just say 3 things.
1. I love that golden gate inlay - that gets my vote for #2.
2. I'd never vote for any black and white inlay. Not even Mapes.
3. I say this Harvey's chip inlay could be the nuts:

image.jpg
 
I've got some thinking to do. It's hard not to be persuaded by the overall chip colors/spot patterns.

In my eyes, it's going to be hard to beat that sweet inlay of the Sahara fiver shown by @RowdyRawhide above:

IMG_1579.JPG


The Fremont
Fremont.jpg


Castaways:
Castaways.jpg


Club Cleopatra:
Club Cleopatra.jpg


Bourbon Street:
IMG_1595.JPG


Seven Cedars:

IMG_1585.JPG
IMG_1584.JPG

IMG_1583.JPG

IMG_1582.JPG

IMG_1581.JPG

Seven Cedars 1.jpg
Seven Cedars 2.jpg


And I guess if Duy's Palace was voted best custom chip set, we should at least nominate their influence:



IMG_1587.JPG
IMG_1588.JPG
IMG_1589.JPG
IMG_1590.JPG
IMG_1591.JPG
IMG_1586.JPG
IMG_1592.JPG
IMG_1593.JPG
IMG_1594.JPG
 
Last edited:
Some great stuff so far. I refrained from adding those posted ahead of me, like the old flamingo.
 
In no particular order:

The Aladdin, Vegas

image.jpeg


The Sands, Vegas

image.jpeg


The Flamingo, Vegas (yes, die cut metal inlay counts!)

image.jpeg


Boulder Club, Vegas

image.jpeg


Tropicana, Vegas

image.jpeg


New China Club, Reno (I can't decide which is better)

image.jpeg
image.jpeg


Showboat, Vegas

65191.jpg



Rainbow Club, Gardena, CA

035946.jpg


South Tahoe Club, Lake Tahoe

36700.jpg


The Mint, Vegas

25963.jpg
 
Well, you didn't specify paper or plastic inlays, so I'm going with it. Technically, it is an inlay.

I was kidding - of course it counts. And it's one of the best die cuts for sure. Sad to think how unlikely it is that any more die cuts will ever be made.
 
View attachment 74837 View attachment 74839
I've always been partial to the MGM Lion. I think I like the BJ inlay better with the gold foil look.

The MGMs were on my shortlist for sure, though I prefer the earlier designs. Both Vegas and Reno had sick cash set line-ups in the 70s and 80s. I would have LOVED to play with either of these.

To me these almost demonstrate how a full rack can be greater than the sum of its parts in that the inlay is very understated (particularly the Vegas rack), but the full rack comes together perfectly.

Vegas:

pFulSAR.jpg
7UBfQJN.jpg
2ptNwLg.jpg
cC7dMBI.jpg


Reno:

P2wWEvA.jpg
eWWgnlG.jpg
4zOoZny.jpg
ETjQxsY.jpg
 
Do you want to stick with rack inlays or are commemorative inlays eligible? I have a few favorite commems but they might be better in their own thread.
 
Do you want to stick with rack inlays or are commemorative inlays eligible? I have a few favorite commems but they might be better in their own thread.

It's a good question, but I think you're probably right that commemoratives should be considered separately.
 
Maybe this should be split into two competitions: one for designs that apply across an entire set of chips, and one for a single denominational inlay from a set featuring significantly different inlays?

The first category could include sets like the Dunes, or Treasures, whose denoms all differ only slightly, e.g. by color, or printed denomination.

The second would evaluate single extremely strong inlay designs from sets whose other chips or denoms might be significantly weaker. An example (for me) is the Mesquite Star large star $25, which is without a doubt my favorite $25 ever -- but I wouldn't take the small star lower denoms as gifts.

Just a suggestion -- it'll be fun either way.
 
Greatest inlay of all time; old school, universal theme, easily recognizable, balanced. In short: perfect.
kings castle 50-cent chip.jpg


Simple, elegant, color-matched (hey, adjectives are best served in threes, right?) Instant classic.
bellagio $1 chip.jpg


Love the scroll-work.
casino montelago $1 chip.jpg


Not the prettiest design, but "greatest" doesn't necessarily mean "prettiest"--it also be the most recognizable, iconic, or maybe just understated.
mgm grand $1 chip.jpg


Purty and colorful.
sands poker room $1 chip.jpg


Excellent inlay/clay matching
mirage $100 chip.jpg


"The Venetian" twice on one chip is silly, but I still think the overall design is nice.
venetian $10 chip.jpg


Iconic. Sweet design.
dunes $25 chip.jpg


I just love that Benny put his face on his chips.
binions horseshoe $100 chip.jpg


I don't care about the parrot, but that is one fine ship, my friends.
ti.jpg
 
Maybe this should be split into two competitions: one for designs that apply across an entire set of chips, and one for a single denominational inlay from a set featuring significantly different inlays?

The first category could include sets like the Dunes, or Treasures, whose denoms all differ only slightly, e.g. by color, or printed denomination.

The second would evaluate single extremely strong inlay designs from sets whose other chips or denoms might be significantly weaker. An example (for me) is the Mesquite Star large star $25, which is without a doubt my favorite $25 ever -- but I wouldn't take the small star lower denoms as gifts.

Just a suggestion -- it'll be fun either way.

Could be interesting, but I think there are too few sets with all unique chips that would fall into the latter category, so probably a better idea to just throw them all into the mix here.

Plus, I kind of think of the ability to keep the quality consistent over multiple different chips in a set as part of the strength of the full inlay design of the set. In that way, a single design can include several different iterations (as mentioned in the OP, the PNYs, for instance). It can be kind of a high variance design strategy depending both on the ability to come up with good designs for all chips and also on whether people like the multiple-chip design. When executed well and people love them, huge win. If executed poorly or people don't like the idea, the overall design will rate more poorly.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom