PAHWM: $2/5 NL ATs (1 Viewer)

[Forty4]

Thank you. I miss these hand discussions, feel like there use to be a lot more in the past.

 

[JustinInMN]

The villian's holding does make sense so he was a bit wider than initially assumed. I don't know if I would assume hero has a stronger range on the flop than villian unless hero is flatting QQ, KK, and AA pre. Especially since villian can have the sets than hero can as well. Hero can probably have more k-hi club hands than villian.

So I do think villian was playing this to station and just improved to a spot where he had hero's entire range beaten. I think he is still calling most cards that don't make his hand. He may call on most non club rivers (Maybe as wide as all cards under 10, maybe not the board pairs?), knowing your range contains more clubs and he doesn't block clubs.

Now on the other hand, in retrospect, the 4-bet pre might have worked since I assume villian's hand is near the bottom of his 3 bet range. Even if villian calls, hero is set up to shove the flop with the flush draw and holding on to villian's hand is tougher with that action.

But an interesting hand no less. thanks for sharing.

 

[Kain8]

Not only does your river bet get through if he doesn't spike his gutshot, but your turn bet definitely gets through if the five doesn't land. Honestly your opponent played this hand about as poorly as possible. I mean, he got basically the one runout that is good for him. What does a good thinking player do after getting check-raised on a 9 6 3 flop with an abundance of draws available holding pocket sevens? There are way too many bad turns and rivers for you to be happy to put any more money in.

Wonky hand to say the least!

 

[Steve Birrer]

Interested to see how this ends. Wouldn't have mattered to me since I folded to the preflop 3 bet....lol

 

[Payback]

Interested to see how this ends. Wouldn't have mattered to me since I folded to the preflop 3 bet....lol

Already posted the results. Go back a few posts and find the spoiler.