My buddy and I were at PH in Vegas this weekend, and I witnessed a weird situation, thought I'd get some feedback:
Playing 1/2 NL, at the table with a bunch of rec players and a few grinders. My buddy Danny is across the table from me, and he's sitting next to a very LAG rec player, who is being loud and a teenie annoying (somewhat taunting Danny, though Danny can take the needling and doesn't seem affected). The entire table seems spirited.
The dealer is sliding cards, and accidentally turns up an ACE for Danny's second card. Danny looks down at his first card, and grimaces (not overly so)... Then slowly (and reluctantly) mucks his hand after aggressive betting before him. Danny doesn't complain about the up card, as Danny is an experienced player, and dealer mistakes happen (oh well).
After the hand, (I think) on a K7A6Q board (winning hand is KQ), the LAG starts bitching that he folded pocket 7's due to the aggressive betting pre-flop, and that he would have won. Danny then explains (nicely) to the LAG that he should stop bitching, as he would have had pocket aces, but didn't complain when the dealer flipped one of the aces up. There is a brief (but friendly) back and forth, and then the dealer chimes in...
The dealer tells the LAG that Danny wouldn't have had pocket aces, as he peeked at Danny's cards (after he mucked). The conversation quickly moved to another subject. However, within an orbit, Danny is racking his chips...
I later asked Danny about the situation, and Danny confirmed that he did not have two aces, that he was just trying to level (needle) the LAG somewhat, and that he was furious the dealer looked at his mucked cards and THEN divulged information to another player about the contents of his mucked hand... Danny said he wasn't sure what local rules permitted, and didn't think it wasn't worth making an issue out of it).
For the record, I saw Danny muck his cards, but looked away right after, and can not confirm if the dealer looked. He admitted he looked, and Danny confirmed that the dealer was correct, so I have to assume it happened.
Whether or not you agree with Danny's needling/leveling, did the dealer cross the line? What would you have done in this situation?
Playing 1/2 NL, at the table with a bunch of rec players and a few grinders. My buddy Danny is across the table from me, and he's sitting next to a very LAG rec player, who is being loud and a teenie annoying (somewhat taunting Danny, though Danny can take the needling and doesn't seem affected). The entire table seems spirited.
The dealer is sliding cards, and accidentally turns up an ACE for Danny's second card. Danny looks down at his first card, and grimaces (not overly so)... Then slowly (and reluctantly) mucks his hand after aggressive betting before him. Danny doesn't complain about the up card, as Danny is an experienced player, and dealer mistakes happen (oh well).
After the hand, (I think) on a K7A6Q board (winning hand is KQ), the LAG starts bitching that he folded pocket 7's due to the aggressive betting pre-flop, and that he would have won. Danny then explains (nicely) to the LAG that he should stop bitching, as he would have had pocket aces, but didn't complain when the dealer flipped one of the aces up. There is a brief (but friendly) back and forth, and then the dealer chimes in...
The dealer tells the LAG that Danny wouldn't have had pocket aces, as he peeked at Danny's cards (after he mucked). The conversation quickly moved to another subject. However, within an orbit, Danny is racking his chips...
I later asked Danny about the situation, and Danny confirmed that he did not have two aces, that he was just trying to level (needle) the LAG somewhat, and that he was furious the dealer looked at his mucked cards and THEN divulged information to another player about the contents of his mucked hand... Danny said he wasn't sure what local rules permitted, and didn't think it wasn't worth making an issue out of it).
For the record, I saw Danny muck his cards, but looked away right after, and can not confirm if the dealer looked. He admitted he looked, and Danny confirmed that the dealer was correct, so I have to assume it happened.
Whether or not you agree with Danny's needling/leveling, did the dealer cross the line? What would you have done in this situation?