Cash Game Rules relating to folding/mucking at showdown (1 Viewer)

I like to state before we start a game which rules are used in the game, but also I remember the responsibility of a dealer even if we are in a self-deal tournament.
Lately we are using a RROP

ROBERT’S RULES OF POKER

The Show down
Cards speak (cards read for themselves). The dealer assists in reading hands, but players are responsible for holding onto their cards until the winner is declared. Although verbal declarations as to the contents of a hand are not binding, deliberately miscalling a hand with the intent of causing another player to discard a winning hand is unethical and may result in forfeiture of the pot.

Dead Hands
Your hand is declared dead if you fold or announce that you are folding when facing a bet or a raise. You throw your hand away in a forward motion causing another player to act behind you (even if not facing a bet).
Cards thrown into the muck may be ruled dead. However, a hand that is clearly identifiable may be retrieved at management’s discretion if doing so is in the best interest of the game. We will make an extra effort to rule a hand retrievable if it was folded as a result of false information given to the player.

Situation 1 in the OP it's easy: I would apply "We will make an extra effort to rule a hand retrievable if it was folded as a result of false information given to the player"

Situation 2 in the OP less easy:
a) In one hand, I would declare player A hand dead as B declared 2 pairs and shown both cards. Allowing player A retrieve cards is opening doors and windows to slow-roll.
b) In another hand it's a "very friendly cash game " so I would consider recall everyone the rules, and allow player A to retrieve his cards because they are in front of him and easily identifiable.

Me, personally, i'll apply a in situation 2 and recall the players the duties of a dealer and to hold cards until the winner is declared, specially if there are too much booze.
 
Last edited:
It’s exactly the TDA rule I am thinking of, but how does that match up against Player A verbally saying “fold”? Does that completely override the “fold”?
There is no Action on Player A, so the word 'fold' is of no consequence. He could've said 'chocolate fence' and it would hold the same weight.
 
I do belive that dealer should act or person responsible for play. Bad habits die slow so possible outcome might be:
1. Player will learn his lesson and next time he will wait for cards to be shown,
2. Players will be tempted to angle shoot following the pattern you presented.


Even if you play among friends it's good to have one person on whose experience you will on agree on to make a ruling.

But as subject is interesting I will cite two examples that you may find interesting.

1. Friendly cash game 1/2 PLN nlh. Player A is amator playing after his pool practice but regular on the table. Player B is wannabe professional known from local casinos and clubs, first time on the table. I am player C that is responsible for cash outs and rulings in controversy situations. Mostly I wait till players involved will figure out a compromise.
On the river B bets and A calls. Player B verbally declares AJ what makes him top top. Player A mucks his cards. Player B takes the pot. And now it becomes interesting. When collecting cards for next hand player B throws cards to the dealer and accidentally exposes hips hand that is not rellated to board. Commotion starts as this is clear angle shoot, I am asked to make ruling.
My ruling was: as player A mucked his cards first pot should be awarded to player B no matter how unethical his behavior was. I also take in account that players must learn all angle moves when they will play other clubs.
Unrelated: after few angry words players agree to split the pot. After the game I asked player B not to attend our game again.


Situation 2: tournament in local casino for 40 players, final table. Presented tournament director, local legend, former EPT executive.
Two players A and B. After river A bets and B called. A shows two pair and Player B thinks he lost and throws away his cards to the muck that are flip off and land face up on the table exposing cards that make Broadway stright.
Discussion starts as player B cards landed on the muck but face up. Ruling was that no matter what player B intention were the cards were shown and straight wins.

Your thoughts?
 
1rs situation: a player must show his cards to claim the pot. Obviously he didn't so there is no way that take a piece of the pot. Player A called to see, lesson to learn, don't fold until you seen the winning hand.
If cards of player A are unidentifiable player B won with crap high. Warning to the dealer, pot is not awarded if cards are not shown. Warning to the players you don't touch the pot if dealer don't pushes it toward you.

Situation 2 player B folded. Eventually, keep an eye if there is no colution within players A and B.
 
I agree that Player As cards are live with the last action being "call." If the cards have not touched the muck and are clearly identifiable, I think they win both spots. Spot A clearly, and Spot B with a frown, they should've been aware they had two pair.

I think in the case of calling on the river and wanting to see that the other person bet with "air" - as the person who calls, I think you just wait until the bettor shows their hand. If they refuse, then they can muck it and you can win the pot uncontested without showing your hand too.

Edit: This should brighten your day!
In an unrelated donk story, I had a friend try to bluff shove the river and when he got called, he exclaimed good call, he didn't have anything and flipped it over. He had misremembered his hand, and he actually had a straight (FLOPPED) into a flopped set of Jacks. Obviously cards speak, so he won.
 
Last edited:
You aren't forced to show in a cash game at showdown to take the pot. I've seen times where a player first to act on river bluffs, gets called, then mucks. As the only live player left, the caller takes the pot without having to show.

I've even heard of someone purposely using this fact to their advantage against a bluffer that frequently mucked after getting called. This person called with a likely loser because they thought opponent would muck. If you want to argue the ethics, I understand.
 
Not until he shows his hand.
I do agree in spirit but I wanted to point out that most of the games we talk about takes place in someone's basement rather than casinos where there is dealer and floor staff that can correctly assess situation. People ask about hard rules of showdown. I can see two:
1. When you call the bet its you right to demand a hand to be shown,
2. Cards that have been tossed to the muck face down are dead no matter what the other circumstances are.
 
You aren't forced to show in a cash game at showdown to take the pot.

Not true.
It depends on house rules,


There are places where the rules are unknown, I agree
There are places with strange home rules, I agree
There are players gambler that don't care of the rules, I agree


1 example where you are forced to show Hard Rock Casinos poker rules " Players who fail to show both hole cards at the conclusion of the hand are not entitled to any portion of the pot. "

1 example where you might be forced to show Casino St. Moritz "If, after the dealer has called for the showdown, there is only one player left to claim the pot and the other players pass, this player wins the pot without a showdown. Players who do not lay claim to the pot or players who do not have opponents with a valid hand need not reveal their hand unless requested to do so by the floor manager."
 
Last edited:
You aren't forced to show in a cash game at showdown to take the pot. I've seen times where a player first to act on river bluffs, gets called, then mucks. As the only live player left, the caller takes the pot without having to show.

Our house rules are clear on this. If you get to showdown you must show both cards to claim the pot. If at the river Player A bets, and Player B folds then player A does NOT need to show cards to claim the pot. However that is not showdown.
 
Last edited:
You aren't forced to show in a cash game at showdown to take the pot. I've seen times where a player first to act on river bluffs, gets called, then mucks. As the only live player left, the caller takes the pot without having to show.

I've even heard of someone purposely using this fact to their advantage against a bluffer that frequently mucked after getting called. This person called with a likely loser because they thought opponent would muck. If you want to argue the ethics, I understand.
Lol, the ol' bluff call trick. :)
 
I do agree in spirit but I wanted to point out that most of the games we talk about takes place in someone's basement rather than casinos where there is dealer and floor staff that can correctly assess situation.

You have to show 2 cards (or 4, or 5, depending on how silly the game is) to claim a pot in our homes games....cash or tournament. In fact, in split games with a low, the cards speak rule comes in to play regularly.

Players know they must show their hand to claim a pot and will not hesitate to roll their hand over if they have the best of it... Sometimes, a player will know they got caught and will hold their hand back and discard it...

And infrequently (but it does happen), a player will realize during the next hand that they had the winner. "Turn your cards face up next time" ends that lamenting pretty quickly.
 
One thing that pisses me off in a tourney is when I make a tough call heads up and the guy just mucks them. I called the bet and am entitles to see both the cards. If they had air I want to know the holdings to help establish their range of starting hands...is this a set rule? Players being called must show hands?

Not in my game...but the player also loses the pot if he or she does not show the cards...the callers in my game give you 2 choices:
- muck hand and lose pot
- show hands and have chance to still win it

EDIT: did not see page 2 (sorry for the rehash)
 
Not in my game...but the player also loses the pot if he or she does not show the cards...the callers in my game give you 2 choices:
- muck hand and lose pot
- show hands and have chance to still win it

EDIT: did not see page 2 (sorry for the rehash)
I do belive you can ask dealer to show loosing hand. Pros don't like that but it's your right.
 
There is no Action on Player A, so the word 'fold' is of no consequence. He could've said 'chocolate fence' and it would hold the same weight.

Mmmmm ........ chocolate fence

Screen Shot 2019-09-16 at 1.53.17 PM.png
 
Lol, the ol' bluff call trick. :)

I've seen a video of this from a tournament!

Villain bets river, hero calls. Villain delays showing, hero doesn't budge. Villain shows a king (no king on the board), hero doesn't budge. Villain tosses the cards into the muck, hero fist pumps and shows 9 high.

Villain claims it's his pot because he showed a K, dealer calls floor, floor rules that it's hero's pot.

Hero takes one down for every player that has ever needed to endure a bluffer who is too ashamed to show the bluff. C'mon, people! When your bluff is called you snapshow your cards and proudly declare "king f*cking high"! Sometimes I add a fist pump just to see the despair in the callers eyes, if only for a second...

I have tried several times to find this clip, if someone has the link, please post it!
 
Hand is dead but cards may be exposed by dealer.

Only cards that hit the muck should be those killed by the dealer. Players have no business whatsoever messing with the dealer's muck pile, including adding cards to it.

Agreed....but no casino reg and my home games are self dealing...since the dealer is also playing his hand...there is always a muck pile on the table.
When the cards hit the pile they are dead.

Thanks for the info tho...and agreed sticto senso :)
 
You have to show 2 cards (or 4, or 5, depending on how silly the game is) to claim a pot in our homes games....cash or tournament.
Really? I bet flop, it folds around, and I have to show? I’m fine with it in principle, but it’s not at all standard.
 
Really? I bet flop, it folds around, and I have to show? I’m fine with it in principle, but it’s not at all standard.
I'm pretty sure he means at a showdown. If your river bet is called and you show kings, it's not enough for your opponent to show that he hit an ace, he needs to show the kicker too unless he wishes to concede the pot to you.
 
Last edited:

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom