Cheating allegations at Stones (2 Viewers)

Whellp, the brain trust that is Mike Postle decided to do an interview with Mike Matusow today. Going on the record about cheating allegations sounds like a GREAT idea! It's obvious this guy doesn't have an attorney yet.

The interview will be posted at 8pm Pacific on Mike's podcast page.


At 8:15 Pacific, Joey Ingram will do a livestream discussion of the interview on his YouTube channel:
thanks for keeping me updated, im 2 hours into joeys video from last night....... lol
 
:ROFL: :ROFLMAO:
Screenshot_20191005_131320.jpg
 
Matusow is stoned on his podcast with Postle.

The guy can barely complete a sentence.

This is embarrassing (for Matusow).
Love Joe Ingram's comments. "The guy (Matusow) has watched an hour of footage and is giving Postle the interview of his life admitting he is higher then a kite but wants the audience to know we are taking this interview very seriously. Ha ha
 
Someone innocent would most likely want to speak directly with their accusers (ie polk or Ingram). Speaking with an @$$ clown like Matasu is dumb. If I was wrongly accused of something I’d be shouting from the rooftops about it. These guy is pretty obviously guilty. His best bet would be coming clean.
 
He's either going down with the ship or he'll try to implicate his fellow co-conspirators once the gaming commission comes calling.
 
He's either going down with the ship or he'll try to implicate his fellow co-conspirators once the gaming commission comes calling.

They always crack. No honor among thieves.
 
I’m holding out hope for part 2 of mike The mouth which goes out tonight. He went onto joey’s stream afterwards and explained how he approached the interview...let the guy relax and talk. The mouth claims that the approach worked and that Postle really opened up in part 2.

He does have a point, if you start just hammering an investigation with this guy then there is a real risk he’s going to either leave your podcast or just not say much at all
 
Their Twitter cover photo (since has changed) was a giant dickish/troll move.

View attachment 348273
A while back, IIRC Stones was temporarily banned from live streaming on YouTube. They said they were "in YouTube jail" and created these graphics.

I suspect they never changed it afterward, and this was an unfortunate coincidence rather than a troll.
 
A while back, IIRC Stones was temporarily banned from live streaming on YouTube. They said they were "in YouTube jail" and created these graphics.

I suspect they never changed it afterward, and this was an unfortunate coincidence rather than a troll.

It was a standard Stones graphic for most of last week. They changed it to the YouTube police graphic during the Postle mess. But now knowing this story... I'm guessing they put it up again in response to the internal decision to shut down their stream... and not as an intentional troll to the "Twitter Police." I'm sure they realized how bad it looked, which is why they quickly went back to the Stones graphic banner.

Thank you for sharing this. It does add a bit of necessary info.
 
Guys I hadn't thought of this point before. I'm chatting with Kasey (poker momma) on the thirst lounge stream, and she is worried that back in March when she told Justin of her thoughts that they could get rid of any discriminating evidence. Her words so I'm wondering what in her opinion they could get rid of.
 
Guys I hadn't thought of this point before. I'm chatting with Kasey (poker momma) on the thirst lounge stream, and she is worried that back in March when she told Justin of her thoughts that they could get rid of any discriminating evidence. Her words so I'm wondering what in her opinion they could get rid of.

Not trying to be the grammar police, but I think you mean incriminating evidence.

And I don’t believe anything Justin says.

Furthermore, it’s starting to look like this was all done with cell phones. All it will take is one search warrant to find all of the phones that pinged the Stones tower across all of the nights Postle played. Cross reference that list with Stones staff, and you’re likely now down to a few dozen or so devices. Find the ones in constant communication on those dates, and you have your culprits.

This can be solved in a few hours once investigators get the cell tower and data logs.
 
Not trying to be the grammar police, but I think you mean incriminating evidence.

And I don’t believe anything Justin says.

Furthermore, it’s starting to look like this was all done with cell phones. All it will take is one search warrant to find all of the phones that pinged the Stones tower across all of the nights Postle played. Cross reference that list with Stones staff, and you’re likely now down to a few dozen or so devices. Find the ones in constant communication on those dates, and you have your culprits.

This can be solved in a few hours once investigators get the cell tower and data logs.
Of course lol! Obviously not discriminating. I'm and idiot. I'm hoping they did you something like phones so it is obvious and they catch these rotten bastards. Did you see the video where Justin said he sold his soul so he could play like God?
 
Ok, so I have spent every waking moment the past 2 day's going over everything I can find on this - big props to SVP and ESPN by the way, and one thing just hit my brain. I know there are some lawyers here and maybe they can explain to me if I am wrong here and why (please do people only get smarter by talking like this), but if it is proven that an employee is in on this, *cough scumbag tournament director cough*, I think that through theft, fraud, and embezzlement that a federal prosecutor could prove the Stones is a criminal enterprise with the RICO Act. I mean hey, how long did Matt Milken get?
 
Last edited:
I think a Stones employee almost has to be in on it. It's the far likelier situation. If he were just able to hack the RFID system somehow on his own, he could do that elsewhere too. But he only plays the Stones game, despite winning enough money to be able to go up in stakes and net bigger profits in Vegas and LA. Yet he stays. Also, I get the impression just from watching him that he's not the sharpest knife in the drawer (not based on poker plays, I'm referring to body language and self-awareness). I think he was most likely approached by someone at the casino and they agreed to do some sort of profit sharing enterprise.
 
I think a Stones employee almost has to be in on it. It's the far likelier situation. If he were just able to hack the RFID system somehow on his own, he could do that elsewhere too. But he only plays the Stones game, despite winning enough money to be able to go up in stakes and net bigger profits in Vegas and LA. Yet he stays. Also, I get the impression just from watching him that he's not the sharpest knife in the drawer (not based on poker plays, I'm referring to body language and self-awareness). I think he was most likely approached by someone at the casino and they agreed to do some sort of profit sharing enterprise.
Exactly. Give this to a grand jury. You only have to convince half of them that he cheated and that will get indictments for 62 counts of felony grand larceny (California law title 9 chapter 10 section 332). One night in jail waiting for a judge to set bail will have him squealing like the pig he is hoping to get a deal with the prosecutor.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom