It's a she. And she's 110 lbs.Lookslike a good boyscary
And extremely intimidating.
She's barking at the back of my head as we speak. I fear.
It's a she. And she's 110 lbs.Lookslike a good boyscary
I feel like I am missing a step or something as well.I feel like this is missing a step.
In addition to putting the cash in the envelope, each buy-in should need to be tracked for each player as well, so you can audit the cash against the record to ensure the correct amount is there.
My only concern about this method achieving what you want (being able to identify shortages by player) is that you can still make mistakes distributing the chips, and those would end up being an unaccounted shortage.
I’m unclear on why you have to write anything down.I only accept cash buy in's up front. Don't like cash app recording my accounting or adding to my taxes. I just keep a small pad that i write down what people buy in for. If they rebuy, i cross out the original buy in and add the current amount they have put in. Been a simple practice, throw the piece of paper out when i'm done.
On payouts, i count and have one other player count as well to ensure we are on point. It has worked out fine thus far. Money in a small lockbox.
Cash in:I feel like I am missing a step or something as well.
Always looking for better, cleaner, less hassle ways to do things.
Not sure - I fully get this, but 8 players start a game. Each player has an envelope. so you have 8 envelopes?
then the player puts money in the envelope and someone gives them chips? Who verifies the amount in the envelope matches the chips they are given?
Can player take cash out of the envelope while the game is in progress?
If a player needs more chips, they put more cash in the envelope? and get more chips?
a player leaves the game early, they cash out, they have lots of chips (they profited), they have more chip value than the cash in their envelope ? where do they get the extra cash?
If a player is low on chips, has less chips than cash in envelope, less than what they bought in for, do they only take the cash out of their envelope for the amount of chips?
if so where does the extra cash go? Who double checked the "cash Out" and money in/out of the envelope?
When the remaining players cash out, and you have 7 players counting chips and having envelopes, who reconciles the cash envelope to the chips for each player?
I must missing something, it can't be this complicated? or easy
It makes it easier to track and lets you know how much should be in the pot. That’s why I write things down, also to be like “damn @merkong dropped $800 last night, make sure he’ll be at the next game!”I’m unclear on why you have to write anything down.
If the banker counts the cash and the chips and the player counts the chips the bank is on. Always.It makes it easier to track and lets you know how much should be in the pot. That’s why I write things down, also to be like “damn @merkong dropped $800 last night, make sure he’ll be at the next game!”![]()
That’s all good but I think the point that some are trying to make is that everything beyond the “cash for chips, chips for cash” method isn’t really necessary. It takes all of 15 seconds to put a $100 in the drawer mid-session between hands and throw 4 $25 chips at someone.OP: here's a thread very much on topic: https://www.pokerchipforum.com/threads/bank-a-little-light-at-nights-end-etiquette.137673/
It'll explain how I arrived at accepting cash and e-payments and why I adopted an auto-tallying spreadsheet. It only slows down the game a little for the host (you get dealt out so others can keep playing) and adds a ton of certainty. I have never had an error while using it. Hope that's helpful
Sometimes things go wrong. You're right, cash for chips and chips for cash should work 100% of the time. It doesn't. People are flawed and will make mistakes. Even if bank is perfect, its nice to be able to clearly show why its perfect.That’s all good but I think the point that some are trying to make is that everything beyond the “cash for chips, chips for cash” method isn’t really necessary. It takes all of 15 seconds to put a $100 in the drawer mid-session between hands and throw 4 $25 chips at someone.
Still not getting it…
lol no I won’t. It’s just that some players don’t like a record of their activity. Even if the banker ate the slip of paper (all this eating) right in front of them at the end of the night. Poker players…Sometimes things go wrong. You're right, cash for chips and chips for cash should work 100% of the time. It doesn't. People are flawed and will make mistakes. Even if bank is perfect, its nice to be able to clearly show why its perfect.
I know you're gonna quote my post and say the same thing again lol.
And I’m usually stuck… No bueno.The house eats the discrepancy. I’m the house and my son-in-law is the banker. If it’s off (never has been) he has to deal with dad lol
You don't wanna mess with my collections agent.
But I bet if I gave her a handful of doggy treats, she'd be my new BFF!she's 110 lbs.
And extremely intimidating.
Yes..but she hits her BFFs....But I bet if I gave her a handful of doggy treats, she'd be my new BFF!
IMO it's on the banker to eat the discrepancy unless otherwise discussed in advance of the shortage.lol no I won’t. It’s just that some players don’t like a record of their activity. Even if the banker ate the slip of paper (all this eating) right in front of them at the end of the night. Poker players…
The house eats the discrepancy. I’m the house and my son-in-law is the banker. If it’s off (never has been) he has to deal with dad lol
When I say the “house” I mean me, the owner of the game. I have never, ever considered passing on the banks shortage to players and would never play at a game where that was proposed. Insanity.IMO it's on the banker to eat the discrepancy unless otherwise discussed in advance of the shortage.
In general, I'm not a fan of leaving it open for the game to potentially end with "The bank is short and now all the winners have to take a haircut." In reality, most of the time this isn't going to be a serious haircut, but it's still awkward and can be especially off-putting to new players.
That's assuming the banker is competent, responsible, and attentive. Not all bankers check these three boxes.
If I'm playing in a game where the banker is grabbing cash without counting it, leaving cash in a big disorganized pile, leaving cash unsecured, giving out loans without cash or a clear marker system, allowing players to self-serve their rebuys, getting so drunk he can't function, etc., I'm going to have pretty hard feelings about it if the bank turns up short a bunch of money and I'm getting pressured to make it whole.
Thankfully most bankers are way better than this in my experience, but every so often you get a doozy.
I agree about the banker being responsible for it. I'm not a fan of trying to get players to cover a bank shortage, and I'd hesitate to play in a game where that's done, but I'm not quite on the same level as you are about it. (Obviously as more money is involved, I become more and more concerned about this unknown potential obligation.)When I say the “house” I mean me, the owner of the game. I have never, ever considered passing on the banks shortage to players and would never play at a game where that was proposed. Insanity.
You'd be surprised, especially for smaller-stakes games. Usually your long-running games aren't going to have such an issue here because it can kill the game. But sometimes you'll get a more informal setting or a one-off game where the host is just a guy who wanted to play some poker and started throwing chips around. "Don't worry, I'll take care of the bank. How hard can it be? I'm sure it'll sort itself out fine."Banker trusted and can do basic math.
Check
Bills organized and clipped together.
Check
Cash and chips in a drawer just above bankers privates.
Check
Banker sober as a judge.
Check
Loans? What planet allows that?
Check
Games owner cashing out last just after the banker in the absolute unlikely event there was (never has happened) a miscalculation in order to promote and demonstrate the confidence bestowed on the “forever banker.”
Check
A drunken, unorganized, math illiterate who is borrowing out other people’s money.
Now that’s a scene I’d be avoiding.
and ended up short. The one loan he "gave out" was actually to himself, after he saw other players do a loan (with cash trading hands) and decided "Oh, we're doing loaners now." To himself. In a club with an ATM right there.grabbing cash without counting it, leaving cash in a big disorganized pile, leaving cash unsecured, giving out loans without cash or a clear marker system, allowing players to self-serve their rebuys, getting so drunk he can't function,