Hero's problem is that his holding is fragile with two rounds of betting to come. If Hero calls the modest flop bet, what is the plan for the rest of the hand?
On the best days, villain never bets again and Hero wins at showdown. Hero's flop call wasn't very expensive and ended up paying a good price.
But if villain bets again, is Hero planning to call? Let's say after a brick on the turn, villain bets something between 1/3 and 1/2 pot - is Hero putting ~800 of his 3,400 chips in the pot?
Does Hero ever call a bet on a four-flushing board?
Hero's best chance to win the pot seems to be turning his hand into a bluff. Would villain call an all-in if he was missing a spade in his hand? That line has some merit, but the risks are larger than the reward. We don't have much of an idea about villain's stickiness, but I'd hate to learn he can't fold an overpair when Hero's shove gets snapped off leaving Hero drawing for his tournament as a 1-4 dog.
Hero made a mistake calling the preflop bet. Folding the flop after a miss was one of the better outcomes. That didn't happen. Hero caught top pair and is predictably facing a bet - lest we forget, the villain is a passive player who has raised preflop and is now betting the flop. Sure, it is seductive to hope villain is holding AK and is making a C-bet (and sometimes he is) but Hero's hand is already wilting with more cards to come and potentially more bets to pay-off. I am not persuaded by the logic that has Hero making a mistake on the flop because he made a mistake preflop.
Hero might win this hand if he persists, but in my mind even trying one more time is an error -=- DrStrange
PS and now we see the turn just posted prior to my reply. Hero should jam all in now, he is only behind
or AQ(assuming the passive read is good, I can't put villain on a weaker flush) Hero isn't folding now and a four-flush river is going to make Hero puke unless it is the