Bluegrass Poker
Flush
Ok, here’s the situation. T2500 tourney. Blinds start at 5/10. We are later in tourney, down to 6 players. Blinds are at 200/400.
Dealer deals out cards.
BB thinks he is UTG and declares all in for 2900 before anyone else acts. Host tells him he has to pull back the 2500 for now. Folds to cutoff who says he “calls the all in for 2900” or raises to 2900 depending on your viewpoint.
Dealer folds and SB folds. BB then goes all in or calls the 2900 depending on viewpoint.
After the hand one of the players says that once BB said all in before anyone acted that he was bound to that action regardless of what action any one on the table takes.
Poker TDA rule 53 seems to cover this issue.
So what ruling do you make.
Is BB committed to all in even after cutoff bets/calls 2900.
Or did the cutoff’s action of 2900 open the BB back up to any action.
The table was split.
Dealer deals out cards.
BB thinks he is UTG and declares all in for 2900 before anyone else acts. Host tells him he has to pull back the 2500 for now. Folds to cutoff who says he “calls the all in for 2900” or raises to 2900 depending on your viewpoint.
Dealer folds and SB folds. BB then goes all in or calls the 2900 depending on viewpoint.
After the hand one of the players says that once BB said all in before anyone acted that he was bound to that action regardless of what action any one on the table takes.
Poker TDA rule 53 seems to cover this issue.
So what ruling do you make.
Is BB committed to all in even after cutoff bets/calls 2900.
Or did the cutoff’s action of 2900 open the BB back up to any action.
The table was split.