Quicksilver-75
4 of a Kind
It has many manifestations. The hardest part of diagnosis is acceptance.
I've had this happen a few times. Each time with the same player. Sad thing is it was my father. He insisted on playing and rather than have him attend his usual watering hole we dealt him in. Each time he'd lose he would turn into a rant. He has trouble controlling his emotions. He would also seemingly get confused when someone went all in. Curiously, he would get angry and fold because he felt he couldn't call..
When I asked him why he said he didn't have enough in chips to call. We all just kinda looked at each other. When we told him he can still call and win what he has invested he seemed confused and wanted to leave.
I since have asked him to not join my games. Rather, if he wanted to play I'd organize a game for his friends at their pub. It's sad to watch. It's harder to deal with.
This guy is very nice, plays a lot of poker locally
Just a guess, but maybe your player might have played limit games in the past that didn't use "table stakes," and (maybe due to aging) is confusing this with the concept of "table stakes" that are inherent to no-limit games and tournaments.It was more than a slight confusion... when it was clearly explained, he continued to be adamant that he was entitled to V2's chips. He acknowledged that V1 was entitled to his main stack, since he had him covered, but somehow believed he should get V2's bounty and 3k. It was weird.
And the sad thing is we're really no closer than we were back in the 50s. I was reading an article on this the other day that basically said unlike cancers and other diseases with all sorts of treatment options and stuff our knowledge of these dementias is still next to nothing. When we think we have a breakthrough on further study it turns out the past assumptions were wrong and the outcomes are statistically insignificant. So we wind up right back where we started.But they're working on it, those scientists and medical folks.
And the sad thing is we're really no closer than we were back in the 50s. I was reading an article on this the other day that basically said unlike cancers and other diseases with all sorts of treatment options and stuff our knowledge of these dementias is still next to nothing. When we think we have a breakthrough on further study it turns out the past assumptions were wrong and the outcomes are statistically insignificant. So we wind up right back where we started.