You can't be serious, can ya?That footage of her stomach vibrating looked pretty damning.
I haven't heard anything new come out about the incident if other details came out regarding that little tidbit.Yo
You can't be serious, can ya?
I think people need to stop pretending that there weren't a whole lot of reasons to be suspicious. There were.Not surprised. I think it’s pretty obvious she didn’t cheat at this point. Also it’s pretty ridiculous that when the money went in Garrett was a favorite yet still acted like a victim. He had absolutely no evidence there was cheating besides the fact he didn’t like how someone played their hand
I think people need to stop pretending that this would have even been an issue whatsoever had Garrett won the hand.I think people need to stop pretending that there weren't a whole lot of reasons to be suspicious. There were.
Or even chopped it...I think people need to stop pretending that this would have even been an issue whatsoever had Garrett won the hand.
Not surprised. I think it’s pretty obvious she didn’t cheat at this point. Also it’s pretty ridiculous that when the money went in Garrett was a favorite yet still acted like a victim. He had absolutely no evidence there was cheating besides the fact he didn’t like how someone played their hand
If he wants in on the Whale a Palooza Million Dollar Buy In game in May, he definitely is going to have to kiss and make up. (+) EV for him at the end of the day. He made over a million dollars playing on the Hustler streams.For f'k sake, give the money back Gman you d---.
Naturally. That doesn't change the logic.I think people need to stop pretending that this would have even been an issue whatsoever had Garrett won the hand.
I'm honestly amazed at how many people are playing stupid here, disregarding how many different things seemed very suspect about the whole situation, as well as how logic is being disregarded. It's possible perhaps that a lot of people haven't read up on all these details as I have. There was a whole hell of a lot to be legitimately suspicious about.Read a good portion of the findings, but, haven't gone back to watch the actual hand play out, but, I have a question/thought. Why would anyone give back half the pot if they'd done nothing wrong?
If it's been in a hand and knew I'd done nothing underhanded, I'd laugh at someone batching and complaining of cheating, and/or wanting their money back.
Am I missing something? Again, I haven't seen the hand in question, yet.
I'm honestly amazed at how many people are playing stupid here, disregarding how many different things seemed very suspect about the whole situation, as well as how logic is being disregarded. It's possible perhaps that a lot of people haven't read up on all these details as I have. There was a whole hell of a lot to be legitimately suspicious about.
I'm honestly amazed at how many people are playing stupid here, disregarding how many different things seemed very suspect about the whole situation, as well as how logic is being disregarded. It's possible perhaps that a lot of people haven't read up on all these details as I have. There was a whole hell of a lot to be legitimately suspicious about.
I'm talking about a lot of details, not just one. I think I have been very clear about that multiple times.You're still talking about her shirt vibrating- bud, that was one of the most ludicrous cheating angles brought up. Come on, you don't believe that, do you?
My post was essentially agreeing with you, not criticizing you. You brought up multiple points (and there are more that are relevant) that people seem to be sleeping on.I'm neither "playing stupid," nor stupid. I very clearly stated that I had not watched the hand play out. I simply posed a question to ask "why would anyone that had done nothing wrong return half the pot?" That's the most suspect thing that I caught, having not watched the hand play out.
You can see it here and 15 pages of discussion covering all angles of the situation including your questionI'm neither "playing stupid," nor stupid. I very clearly stated that I had not watched the hand play out. I simply posed a question to ask "why would anyone that had done nothing wrong return half the pot?" That's the most suspect thing that I caught, having not watched the hand play out.
That footage of her stomach vibrating looked pretty damning.
You can see it here and 15 pages of discussion covering all angles of the situation including your question
https://www.pokerchipforum.com/threads/do-you-think-robbi-jade-lew-cheated-poll.95480/
I have tuna chips, and I will throw them at you with extreme prejudice.
I'm honestly amazed at how many people are playing stupid here, disregarding how many different things seemed very suspect about the whole situation, as well as how logic is being disregarded. It's possible perhaps that a lot of people haven't read up on all these details as I have. There was a whole hell of a lot to be legitimately suspicious about.