Apache MCR breakdown check

RichMahogany

4 of a Kind
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2013
Messages
6,233
Reaction score
9,916
Location
Sucka Free City
Hey peeps.

Just looking for some quick advice/sanity check with my idea for a chip breakdown of the forthcoming Apache Majestic Card Room chips. Firstly, I would like this set to be very flexible. I want to be able to spread a decent range of micro/low stakes cash games AND tournaments. I know that I should have a separate tourney set(and I do), but this is likely the only set I buy this year. I can hear you all laughing at that last statement already.

My thoughts are to buy a 600 blanks and have non denominated labels made. My reasoning behind this is to start with a 0.05/0.10 cash game and have the ability to scale the chips up without having to buy a new set or have any unused chips.

I have also been lusting after a Big One For One Drop style tourney set for a while now. At one point I had over 1300 hot stamped Paulson solids that I cleaned by hand. I sold them once I realized that I'd probably never get around to scraping and labeling them all.

Anyhow, I'd like this set to be able to play a half BOFOD stack for 8 players, which is the table max for that tourney. For those who don't know, that would mean a breakdown of:

25-1000
25-5000
14-25,000
10-100,000

Per player.

That means a set of:
200-1000
200-5000
120-25,000(8 for T1000 color up)
80-100,000(+10 possibly for T5000 color up?)

I could also do stacks of 20/16/8/6 for more than 8 players and 10/8/4/3 for up to 20 players with plenty left for color ups.

So, using the BOFOD style stack I could do this for cash games as these will be non denominated:

120 blind chips(T25,00 tourney)
200 workhorse chips(T1000 tourney)
200 big bet chips(T5000 tourney)
80+biggest chips(T100,000 tourney)

I know that 120 blind chips isn't necessary, but I feel like this is a good compromise for a flexible set.

I understand that the chip scaling from cash to tourney could be problematic but these will mostly be used with a small group of very close friends. Otherwise, others are very unlikely to ever see/use these chips.

Am I just friggin nuts or do you think this could work?

P.S. sorry for the long post
 

Mental Nomad

Full House
Joined
Nov 7, 2014
Messages
3,640
Reaction score
2,452
Location
NJ - NY/NJ metro area
I think it works fine.

For a long time, I played a 50 cent/ $1 game with the following breakdown:

40 blind chips (50 cent, actually a charcoal hundo re-purposed)
160 $1 workhorse ($160)
160 $5 bigger bet ($800)
160 $25 "bank" chips ($4000)

This was an ample bank for us. Even with ten players, we rarely had many greens in play. Ten people times two buy-ins is $2000, and this is a total bank of $4960. We rarely broke $2k. Degens might risk the bank, but we never did.

So your setup with 200, 200, 80? I think you're safe. (I'm ignoring blinds.)
To be safe, I'd set it up as the 80 for the blind chip, then 200/200/120 for the rest. Gives you more big bank chips.
Also, with non-denoms, you can give yourself a measure of safety by defining the big bank chip as more... mine were denominated, but if I could have called the green a $50 or a hundo, there would be no risk of breaking the bank.

If in doubt, count up what your total bank is - and how many full buy-ins that fits. If it's more than 40 buy-ins (four per person times ten players), I think you're safe.
 
Top Bottom