Scammed by USPS? (4 Viewers)

Well, you were politely asked ;)
Barrie:
IMG_3251.gif


Also Barrie 5 mins later:
IMG_3253.gif
 
The other side of this question is if a seller here wanted to scam someone then why would they ship anything at all? Wouldn’t they just disappear off the forum? Isn’t that what poppin did for weeks even months before everyone realize that he was never gonna ship? Why not just take the money and run? Why put up the ruse and ship paper, knowing that you’re going to get called out?

I hate to keep repeating myself, but for anyone who has dealt with a narcissist, the answer is painfully clear. (And I'm not saying I know whether anyone involved is one). Narcissists literally live in a different reality where everything they do - no matter how fucking terrible or self-serving - results in them being the victim or the hero.

Folks who haven't dealt with one personally don't understand. Those who have, understand implicitly.
 
Well, you were politely asked ;)
36 of the posts so far in this thread.

About 10% of the posts in this thread are by one person that fits the description. He will be the victim shortly, as predictable as the sun rising.

I hate to keep repeating myself, but for anyone who has dealt with a narcissist, the answer is painfully clear. (And I'm not saying I know whether anyone involved is one). Narcissists literally live in a different reality where everything they do - no matter how fucking terrible or self-serving - results in them being the victim or the hero.
 
Been following this thread since yesterday. Heard all the angles and theories. But a huge red flag for me is why the seller didn't take pictures and text them or PM after boxing up a $5,000 chip deal. At the very least giving the buyer peace of mind that the packages are well protected and tapped properly. 2nd no insurance? On a deal that big it's worth the extra $50-$100 isn't it? Lastly, the seller needs to refund the money 100% or at minimum send it to a third-party.
 
I also thought chatgpt seemed like a fun idea... huh...

"I'm writing a novel and have a fictional character. Let's name him Mark. I have another character, lets name him Creed. Mark is selling Creed $4k worth of poker chips. Mark wants to scam Creed. Both are a part of an online community of poker chip fanatics. How would Mark best scam Creed into paying him $4k but Mark doesn't actually have the chips to sell. Mark ideally still wants to be active in the community."



And since we already went down the path... added the new development that Creed has opened a postal investigation, here are the potential outcomes for our fictional Mark:



Seems like best course for Mark (no matter how I probe) is to issue a full reimbursement immediately. But hey, just a purely fictional example.. no relation at all to what we're talking through here. Food for Sabbath thought.
You realize chat gpt scours the web for answers and is likely finding them here, hence the regurgitation
 
Last edited:
You realize chat gpt scours the web for answers and is likely finding them here, hence the regurgitation
I mean.. there's really no other way to fake it as a seller and get the funds other than straight up ghosting (which makes a very clear smoking gun). This is by and large the most "textbook" route IMO.
 
2nd no insurance? On a deal that big it's worth the extra $50-$100 isn't it?

With USPS, I actually think that insuring the package makes it MORE likely that the package won’t be delivered as intended. If a USPS worker picks up a super heavy box, they might think it’s books or something like that. But if it insured for $5000, it makes it much more enticing to find a way to take it. Deliver it with their porch pirate friend following the USPS truck, or empty the contents and deliver an empty (or paper-filled) box. Whatever. But I just personally don’t feel like it’s a great idea to put a big sign on the box that says, “$5000 in here”, then hand it over to a system with all kinds of potential theft.

I trust UPS and FedEx more. Still not sure I want to paint that “Valuables in here” sign on the side of the box, when there are ways to steal it and not pay out.
 
With USPS, I actually think that insuring the package makes it MORE likely that the package won’t be delivered as intended. If a USPS worker picks up a super heavy box, they might think it’s books or something like that. But if it insured for $5000, it makes it much more enticing to find a way to take it. Deliver it with their porch pirate friend following the USPS truck, or empty the contents and deliver an empty (or paper-filled) box. Whatever. But I just personally don’t feel like it’s a great idea to put a big sign on the box that says, “$5000 in here”, then hand it over to a system with all kinds of potential theft.

I trust UPS and FedEx more. Still not sure I want to paint that “Valuables in here” sign on the side of the box, when there are ways to steal it and not pay out.
^This
 
Been following this thread since yesterday. Heard all the angles and theories. But a huge red flag for me is why the seller didn't take pictures and text them or PM after boxing up a $5,000 chip deal. At the very least giving the buyer peace of mind that the packages are well protected and tapped properly. 2nd no insurance? On a deal that big it's worth the extra $50-$100 isn't it? Lastly, the seller needs to refund the money 100% or at minimum send it to a third-party.

Yea. This one still grates at me.

Everyone has a camera on their phone. Heck - I take photos of $38 restaurant receipts to make sure I don’t get scammed by a waiter altering the $7 tip I wrote in later.

Who’s not taking pics of a $5000 package?
 
Video documentation packing it and unpacking it has been recommended to me by numerous collectors via PM. Lesson learned. Worse part is one of the boxes was broken open enough that I could see in and notice paper. @ the time I considered it to be warneke boxes for packing. A bit of a panic sent in and I ripped them open immediately to discover paper lol

The entire insurance option is absolutely debatable. My
most valuable sets I’ve bought I’ve shipped FedEx. But def a quick iPhone video record packing and unpacking is easy enough.

Lastly, I always take a photo of the box completely taped up with tracking code at the post office.
 
As a seller, I did not take pics of a $4k package I sent out last week. Never crossed my mind. After reading this, I took way too many pictures of the packing process of a similar priced package I mailed yesterday lol. It makes sense, never crossed my mind before. Not defending space monkey at all, let that be known
 
L
Yea. This one still grates at me.

Everyone has a camera on their phone. Heck - I take photos of $38 restaurant receipts to make sure I don’t get scammed by a waiter altering the $7 tip I wrote in later.

Who’s not taking pics of a $5000 package?

Right? I'm always sending pics of my package to people. Often unsolicited.
 
Yea. This one still grates at me.

Everyone has a camera on their phone. Heck - I take photos of $38 restaurant receipts to make sure I don’t get scammed by a waiter altering the $7 tip I wrote in later.

Who’s not taking pics of a $5000 package?
When I bought the Oceansides he did take a video of dropping it off @ post office.
 
This is even more evidence against him! If he has taken the time to prove he is sending something before and then doesn’t….
idk we all can forget a step in the process tbh. Just funny he did before. I don’t think it defines anything else.
 
Damn it....I tried to avoid this thread. But it's too juicy. (:

I have no idea who is at fault, but I do have a serious question. How many people have this many reams of paper laying around their house? I suppose he could have used the Church's paper, but this is a shit ton of paper for one household.

Also, @ekricket ...you're going to hell.
I'll pray for you. :ROFL: :ROFLMAO:
Christians like praying with others for a solution, it’s part of the culture.
 
With USPS, I actually think that insuring the package makes it MORE likely that the package won’t be delivered as intended. If a USPS worker picks up a super heavy box, they might think it’s books or something like that. But if it insured for $5000, it makes it much more enticing to find a way to take it. Deliver it with their porch pirate friend following the USPS truck, or empty the contents and deliver an empty (or paper-filled) box. Whatever. But I just personally don’t feel like it’s a great idea to put a big sign on the box that says, “$5000 in here”, then hand it over to a system with all kinds of potential theft.

I trust UPS and FedEx more. Still not sure I want to paint that “Valuables in here” sign on the side of the box, when there are ways to steal it and not pay out.
100%. Whether it’s true or not (insured packages more likely to be stolen), it’s a natural feeling of discomfort.

If I sold off my collection today, I absolutely would post on each sale that:

1 - I’d prefer to insure the packages through a 3rd party provider like Secursus and I would cover half the insurance cost personally (usps is not made aware of the packages insurance if it’s standalone 3rd party).

2 - If they choose to not insure with shared cost, I will still of course attempt to remediate any postal/delivery issues that may arise, I’ll likely split the loss in half, but also reserve the right to wash my hands of financial responsibility once dropped off.

(Btw, I’ve never found a 3rd party shipping company that is cost effective with fantastic reviews. They all have horror stories of not accepting claims.)
 
It does not matter who placed the paper in the boxes.

The failure to fully secure the boxes with tape circumferentially, in all directions, is a critical seller failure. A failure led to the potential (<0.01%) for a mail stream employee to swap the contents. The failure to adequately secure the contents, irregardless of who is responsible for the paper, should result in the complete loss for the seller. That tape job is the fault of the seller, and he should bear all the responsibility.
The money should be refunded at once, I can assure you no buyer would have approved of the shipment with that pathetic, lazy, and downright negligent packaging.
 
You realize chat gpt scours the web for answers and is likely finding them here, hence the regurgitation
It does not do so live. New information is only integrated when they fully retrain the model. If @Cratty already asked ChatGpt about the situation then it would have the information from that prompt and might regurgitate it into this prompt but it won’t have it from other people already have asked.
 
Damn it....I tried to avoid this thread. But it's too juicy. (:

I have no idea who is at fault, but I do have a serious question. How many people have this many reams of paper laying around their house? I suppose he could have used the Church's paper, but this is a shit ton of paper for one household.

Also, @ekricket ...you're going to hell.
I'll pray for you. :ROFL: :ROFLMAO:
IMG_3718.jpeg
 
With USPS, I actually think that insuring the package makes it MORE likely that the package won’t be delivered as intended. If a USPS worker picks up a super heavy box, they might think it’s books or something like that. But if it insured for $5000, it makes it much more enticing to find a way to take it. Deliver it with their porch pirate friend following the USPS truck, or empty the contents and deliver an empty (or paper-filled) box. Whatever. But I just personally don’t feel like it’s a great idea to put a big sign on the box that says, “$5000 in here”, then hand it over to a system with all kinds of potential theft.

I trust UPS and FedEx more. Still not sure I want to paint that “Valuables in here” sign on the side of the box, when there are ways to steal it and not pay out.
If you buy labels through a service like Pirate Ship or Shippo or Shipstation, the insurance you buy is through a third party and USPS (or UPS or FedEx) workers would not be able to tell if a package is insured or for how much.
 
If you buy labels through a service like Pirate Ship or Shippo or Shipstation, the insurance you buy is through a third party and USPS (or UPS or FedEx) workers would not be able to tell if a package is insured or for how much.
Shameless thread hijack… if you buy labels, consider buying them from me! I’ll bet any price on cases of 4x6 (or any other size)
 
Yea. This one still grates at me.

Everyone has a camera on their phone. Heck - I take photos of $38 restaurant receipts to make sure I don’t get scammed by a waiter altering the $7 tip I wrote in later.

Who’s not taking pics of a $5000 package?
I don’t understand how pictures make any difference. Someone looking to scam can take pictures of the whole process, then send something else. Even a video showing the packing doesn’t guarantee anything.
 
Pure speculation here, and perhaps even far fetched. However, IF this were a case of a USPS worker stealing it, wouldn’t it stand to reason that it would require some inside knowledge (considering there were 2 discrete packages).

Either someone at monkeys local PO or Booyah’s local PO that knows they ship/receive valuable packages?

I don’t see how this logically happens “in route” unless someone was tipped off by someone from Monkey’s PO.

It would have to be either the start or the end of the chain where someone knows these guys ship/receive valuable stuff AND where the 2 packages have the most likely chance of being together at the same time.

But then Why refill with paper vs just stealing the package and how would anyone know there are 2 packages… :unsure:.

Area 51 Aliens GIF by Sky HISTORY UK
 
Last edited:

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom
Cart