Thank you, that does make more sense. My ignorance notwithstanding, it's still condensing.Probably best to quote the whole paragraph. The "displeasure" is in reference to a different successfully completed transaction.
Thank you, that does make more sense. My ignorance notwithstanding, it's still condensing.Probably best to quote the whole paragraph. The "displeasure" is in reference to a different successfully completed transaction.
Your ignorance brings me great displeasure.....Thank you, that does make more sense. My ignorance notwithstanding, it's still condensing.
I was able to get payment once after A LOT of effort.Has anyone even heard of usps insurance paying out? I hear it’s a major pain.
I am away but will weight the chip amount when I get home next week. Surely other members have already done so.
I have a pending payment from over a year + ago...I was able to get payment once after A LOT of effort.
im going to play devils advocate here for a minute but if you were stealing a heavy item and the weight was listed on the parcel, wouldn't replacing it with paper be the best thing to replace with?
The deal was done through phone messages, not PCF.Given the method of messaging from @SpaceMonkey420 is it possible for Tommy the website host here to look up IP addresses to see if perhaps his account is being used by someone else?
The good news is that we don't really need to keep speculating, as postal investigation is an arm of law enforcement that is very thorough and good at their job. If both parties here have nothing to hide, they would both welcome a robust claim to process.USPS fraud is quite possible - example of paper being used to replace exact missing weight from tampered USPS package. This is just one example.
He actually hasn’t even suggested a postal worker put paper in the boxes. That was my thought process? He thinks I did that and am scamming him. He’s also not answering my phone calls but said he would call me Sunday bc it’s the start of the Sabath day (Saturday?).I feel like you're hanging onto a thread that really isn't. How confused by him asking for half the money back, and that's a polite gesture on his part to try and split the cost of the lose. Very kind on his part. I'm gathering you refused that suggestion, which doesn't speak well for you. Then he tells you he's going after it through his CC and you feel abused, like he's trying to scam you, that's just ignorant. That is one of his avenues to be made whole again. You're trying to make an argument that he's scamming you, but I have no doubt that if you had agreed to give him half back, and, if the CC made him whole, or, an investigation proved you didn't scam him, that he would give you back your half when CC paid off. Things are starting to stack up against you.
He actually hasn’t even suggested a postal worker put paper in the boxes. That was my thought process? He thinks I did that?
The good news is that we don't really need to keep speculating, as postal investigation is an arm of law enforcement that is very thorough and good at their job. If both parties here have nothing to hide, they would both welcome a robust claim to process.
Just hypothesizing, but if I was on the scamming side.. I would want to draw this out as long as possible and get community voices to create noise or create what-ifs to obfuscate the clear path.
That's why I think it's so important now to just push on a clear path... immediate reimbursement and robust claim with the feds. Once both have happened, then I think both parties can decide on any split terms if they have both acted in good faith.
Fully caught up now.
A few observations - me and @doublebooyah85 sharing the same first name made seeing my name all over this thread confusing.
Space monkey 420 has been on my blocked list for quite a while.
When I shipped HSI's to @Rhodeman77 USPS straight up stole a box. There is no way in the processing of packages is someone going to stop, grab a box, go somewhere where they aren't on video taking out contents and replacing them with the exact weight in loose leaf paper. The mental gymnastics needed to get there are, well, mental.
Good luck with the credit card charge back, I hope it works out because I'd be willing to bet that $5k all went to drugs and have been fully consumed by now.
Are you suggesting USPS shenanigans are possible? I'm not sure I understand what you're saying.One thing that really stands out to me, though, is when do multiple box shipments ever stay together through the USPS system? The fact that both boxes had paper in them makes it seem like they stayed side by side the entire time in the USPS system and honestly, that’s a hard pill to swallow.
This is definitely a serious consideration no one has mentioned yet. Very very unlikely to happen in today’s USPS reality. I wonder if the tracking histories are identical.One thing that really stands out to me, though, is when do multiple box shipments ever stay together through the USPS system? The fact that both boxes had paper in them makes it seem like they stayed side by side the entire time in the USPS system and honestly, that’s a hard pill to swallow.
Not at all. The possibility of USPS shenanigans is less likely.Are you suggesting USPS shenanigans are possible? I'm not sure I understand what you're saying.
This is what I was going to call out as well. If it was someone at the post office it would have had to be at some point where the packages were together, and the thief would have to assume they were part of a set.One thing that really stands out to me, though, is when do multiple box shipments ever stay together through the USPS system? The fact that both boxes had paper in them makes it seem like they stayed side by side the entire time in the USPS system and honestly, that’s a hard pill to swallow.
Its most likely to happen at the start or end post office when the packages are together.Not at all. The possibility of USPS shenanigans is less likely.
Correct. I was seeing if Mike @SpaceMonkey420 would take some accountability. Obviously he is going to deny it. I didn’t think he would even consider me being the scammer lol so I offered 50% so we could just chalk it up as usps theft.And when this happened, Craig had video footage of the Postal worker picking up the boxes of chips that he immediately sent me. He also offered to replace the chips immediately. We split the loss instead.
Which is probably why @doublebooyah85 offered 1/2 refund initially, he wanted to believe it was someone at the PO that stole the chips and not a member of the site scamming him. Just my guess obviously.
TrueIts most likely to happen at the start or end post office when the packages are together.
Its most likely to happen at the start or end post office when the packages are together.