Joe Buck
The only thing that really tilts me is when poor players get lucky over and over.
I used to tilt when players made crappy plays and lucked out (at my expense).
What I did to overcome it though was to keep reminding myself about something that Sklansky wrote in his old Hold'em book (paraphrased); it's all about mistakes, and you want to minimize your own and maximize your opponent's. So I played as you point out a bit more 'small ball', and in cash games just always kept track of basic theory - always calling when the odds are right, always making them pay when they're clearly drawing.
Over (literally) the years I'm a winning player in our low stakes games, and they are not. Even if they're on a winning streak making big wins, I'll typically end up ahead on any given night. It's just that me buying in for $50 and walking out with $70 is less sexy and memorable than someone else lucking out and walking out with $320. But I'm almost always walking away with more than I bought in for, and to me that makes me a better player and that prevents me from tilting...
I've learned to cheer when the poor player sucks out. They need it more than the good player, and quite frankly, you feel better cheering even when it costs you money.
In tournaments, players who fail to table their hand in a showdown that involves an all-in. I strictly enforce this rule as a dealer and tournament director, and I do not play in tournaments where this rule is not enforced.
And why in tourneys and not in cash?In tournaments, players who fail to table their hand in a showdown that involves an all-in. I strictly enforce this rule as a dealer and tournament director, and I do not play in tournaments where this rule is not enforced.
Why is it such a big deal for you?
'cause them's the rules.And why in tourneys and not in cash?
That’s all I needed. Thanks!'cause them's the rules. (y) :thumbsup:
YES!!! X 1000!People that say "I seen".
YES!!! X 1000!
How can it be that half (maybe it only seems that high) of the people in my town cannot properly conjugate one of the simplest and most common verbs?!
YES!!! X 1000!
How can it be that half (maybe it only seems that high) of the people in my town cannot properly conjugate one of the simplest and most common verbs?!
Imagine having them conjugate in a language where the verb doesn't change just tense-wise, but also person-wise (the up side would be that they wouldn't have to say I, you, he/she, we, you, they: it would be evident from the verb's suffix)YES!!! X 1000!
How can it be that half (maybe it only seems that high) of the people in my town cannot properly conjugate one of the simplest and most common verbs?!
YES!!! X 1000!
How can it be that half (maybe it only seems that high) of the people in my town cannot properly conjugate one of the simplest and most common verbs?!
I posted my grammatically incorrect string bet before I seen you’re post.I’m in Northern NJ, but I have a bunch of employees that are from Scranton, PA, and that’s all they say... “I seen Mike at the gas station this morning.” And they all say it. Every time. Never once do they slip in a proper usage lol. It baffles me. I even find myself saying it by accident when I’m talking to one of them.
Imagine if someone string bet by saying “I seen your 100 and raise you 250.”
That's a 150 raise from 100 to 250, so next minimum raise is 400 from that 250.No, they don't insist on that, it's more of a question. What happens (frequently) is this:
Beaker: "100".
Me: "Raise to 250"
JohnDoe: "What's the minimum I can raise again?"
FrankDoe: "It has to be twice the previous."
JohnDoe: "Ok, so I make it at least 500 total?"
Me, for the infinitieth time: "No, a raise should be equal to or higher than the largest bet or raise on this betting round, and never below the big blind."
JohnDoe: "Ok... so....???"
Two-three times per night. Year after year.
It's all due to people saying "it has to be double" after the initial bet. So if it had been "JohnDoe" acting before me after you bet 100, someone would have told John "It (total wager) has to be at least 2x when you raise". They don't realize that that's not the rule, it is the coincidental result of the rule in that very first instance.