Was I wrong? (1 Viewer)

crussader

Flush
Joined
Dec 2, 2014
Messages
1,675
Reaction score
2,094
Rewards
0
Location
Houston, Tx
People keep telling me I played this hand wrong and it's stuck in the back of my mind, so I thought I would ask about it here.

I was playing the WSOP Seniors event. It was in level 10, 35 players away from the money bubble. I was in the small blind with pocket sixes, and about eight big blinds behind. The action folded all they way around to me. The big blind had about 25 big blinds in his stack and had doubled me up a couple of orbits earlier when he ran his AK into my AA. I'm thinking this is an auto shove. Am I wrong?
 
The big blind had about 25 big blinds in his stack and had doubled me up a couple of orbits earlier

I was in the small blind with pocket sixes, and about eight big blinds behind.

You were down to/playing with ~4-5 BB, and the bubble was distant but in sight when you last doubled up. Unless villain was recently moved to your table, he is aware that you are tighter than a drum. That said, villain should only call you if he is sitting on a very big hand, or a very large stack.

You risk everything, he folds: you gain 1 BB
You risk everything, he calls with bigger pair: you are 80% to lose
You risk everything, he calls with AK, and you're in a flip for your tournament.

Risk to reward is very low here.
 
1.5 BB technically, plus antes which I assumed were in play at this point.
 
Per snapshove:

Screenshot_20171010-174422.jpg

:D
 
I'd leave it to someone else to give you the M or other technical details, but that's an auto-shove with a very wide range of hands, IMO. I'm probably shoving with almost anything with a face card here, outside of the ugliest queen-rag and jack-rag hands.

You're not lasting much longer, especially if there are antes. You're also not so close to the money that it's worth thinking about bare survival to squeak into a prize. Stealing the blinds is a big gain on your stack (~23%, or more if antes), and it's more likely than usual to succeed with only one player left in the hand. And if that player does call you very wide, it's not so bad, because you do have a legit hand that plays well all-in.

Got a feeling this hand is going to end with you getting snapped off by overcards or something, though. Those are the breaks.
 
Antes were in play. Taking the pot would have given me another full orbit of life and I calculated would have been enough to limp to the bubble. I think my calculations were correct as the bubble burst three orbits later.
 
...You're also not so close to the money that it's worth thinking about bare survival to squeak into a prize.

I had been watching the board and there were ton of short stacks dropping like flies. I estimated the bubble coming in three to five orbits and figured I had about four orbits left. I might have been able to fold to the money from that point, but it was going to be very close and I though the shove here was the less risky play.
 
He tanked for almost 4 minutes, and then called with JJ. I didn't even get a sweat as he flopped a set.

That just goes to show that it was a good shove IMO if he's tanking that long with a pretty premium hand BvB. He's certainly not calling light and you'll be taking it down the majority of the time.
 
I don't even understand how that decision could take more than 30 seconds. Even 30 seconds would be a lot. Pretty sure my chips are beating yours into the middle with JJ.

No kidding, easy snap call IMO.
 
I don't even understand how that decision could take more than 30 seconds. Even 30 seconds would be a lot. Pretty sure my chips are beating yours into the middle with JJ.

BB Villain was thinking about the bubble too... But yeah, JJ is a snap call.

And I agree in that situation, 66 is a shove all day long.
 
BB Villain was thinking about the bubble too...

I think he was thinking about this, the fact that I had already doubled through him, and the fact that I won every pot I entered since I had been at the table.
 
Thanks for the confirmation. I never questioned it at the time. Seemed like a no-brainer play to me.
 

The problem with apps, is they teach the math, but not the psychology behind the game.

Against unknowns, I'd agree the 66 is a shove, and the JJ should have snap-called. The 4 minute tank indicated that I was correct in thinking that villain was never going to call you unless you were losing.

I am the outlier here, but I think the 66 shove was the wrong move vs this particular villain. Best move would have been to wait for a single raise (preferably in late position, but you only have so many bullets left) and then 3-bet all in. This would maximize the chances that your middle or weak pair are vs overcards and you are at least a 50% favorite, not a 20% dog.
 
@Poker Zombie you are missing out on a lot of expected value for all the times he folds, which is obviously very high given how long he took to call.

Stealing the blinds and antes at this point is huge. Increasing his stack by over 20% is worth it.

There is no guarantee he will find another pocket pair to make a 3-bet shove against a late position raise to get a coin flip hand.

Even if he does get called he is in a coin flip vs AK AQ type hands and 20% equity vs the over pair still is something.

The pros use this time close to the bubble to increase their stacks because of how nitty people play. They know they can rob the blinds and antes like crazy, it is easy money.
 
Not wrong, you just happened to run into it, unfortunately. Couldn't really ask for a better spot to add to your chips until he turns up with jacks.
 
I am the outlier here, but I think the 66 shove was the wrong move vs this particular villain.

So do you fold the small blind or limp in and hope he doesn't raise?

Best move would have been to wait for a single raise (preferably in late position, but you only have so many bullets left) and then 3-bet all in.

I think if I waited any longer and my stack got shorter (those antes add up fast) it would quickly get to the point where my shove would have zero fold equity.
 
Who kept telling you played it wrong,

A few friends and family, one of whom is a poker dealer at a casino. Most of them just have too limited knowledge of the game. It was the dealer's comments that gave me pause. However, I don't think he really took the time to fully analyze the situation. I think he was just thinking you don't open shove for your tournament life with a small pocket pair.
 
@Poker Zombie you are missing out on a lot of expected value for all the times he folds, which is obviously very high given how long he took to call.

Stealing the blinds and antes at this point is huge. Increasing his stack by over 20% is worth it.

There is no guarantee he will find another pocket pair to make a 3-bet shove against a late position raise to get a coin flip hand.

Even if he does get called he is in a coin flip vs AK AQ type hands and 20% equity vs the over pair still is something.

The pros use this time close to the bubble to increase their stacks because of how nitty people play. They know they can rob the blinds and antes like crazy, it is easy money.

The pros do, yes. The pros can because the pros are not down to 8 BB. The pros never play to make the money, the pros play to win.

If I were to parrot the pro advice, I would absolutely jam. No doubt there. But we aren't playing pro level poker here, we're playing short-stack survival poker. Even without the reveal, I had posted that he would only get called by a monster. I was right. Not a lucky guess, but an educated one honed by years of short-stack experience with tactics that the pros ignore.

Yes, he's a coin flip vs overcards, but he's only getting called by a monster. Using TJ Clouter's (see, I read pro stuff too) starting hand sizes we can assume villain would only call with AA/KK/QQ/JJ, or AK/AQs. 4 of those hands have him at a 20% underdog.

Jam here and you risk $1,500 for a single orbit worth of blinds/anties, which doesn't mean jack for our hero right now. It is a 5000+ player event and at this point people are dropping quickly. The money is in sight, and short stacks are getting tight, but there are big stacks aplenty to call anything. There are roughly 90 tables in play. The TD may even consider hand-for-hand play soon.

Fold, and you can hang on. Most likely, OP can easily fold for 6 more orbits and min-cash.

Now, I agree, min cash is not your ultimate goal, but at 8BB, winning is no longer your goal. You want to make the right shoves that pay 50% or better. Your goal is to have 12 BB when the bubble bursts. There are roughly 50 players that get paid the same, and the step-up in cash here are very small, so once the bubble busts, you will see a short-stack shove-fest as these old men are tired and want to go to bed. 12 BB will quickly become 24 BB, and then 48 BB. Only then should you re-write your goals once again, and set your goal for the final table.

I don't "hate" the shove, but I think it's not the best possible play.
 
Actually, with antes, he can only fold for 3-4 more orbits. If you're only getting called by monsters (let's say tens and up) those hands only show up about 1/44 times. and 18% of those times you suck out, so really you are only eliminated about 1 out of every 54 shoves (assuming only tens and up calls you. Not sure if this is true, but you said you only get called by monsters, so we'll go with it). if you get a walk, you can increase your stack by about 30 percent, and buy yourself another orbit of folding. With a pocket pair, and only 1 person to get through, I think it is worth the risk to shove.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom