TRK set pricing? (1 Viewer)

What exactly is the problem with these chips? The inlay is clean and simple, with a large denomination in red. Is it the phone number people hate? I don’t see anyone complaining about the inlay on Oceanside Card Club.
I'd suggest the appeal of the OCC chips is the edge spots and colour combos of the chips themselves. The inlay design is every bit as bad as these, but at least the inlays are shaped.
 
I actually dig the inlay, for exactly the reasons you stated.
Also: simple/clean 414 edge spots and traditional colors for the $1's, $5's and $25's.

These are definitely not my favorite chips, but there is something to be said about having a cohesive set with the same inlay that does not require relabeling.
 
What exactly is the problem with these chips? The inlay is clean and simple, with a large denomination in red. Is it the phone number people hate? I don’t see anyone complaining about the inlay on Oceanside Card Club.
Then you should look a bit harder! Plenty of people complain about the phone number inlay on OCC as well.
 
Lots of great chips with questionable inlays. E.g., I know that’s supposed to be a pot of gold on the Grand Gulfports. It looks more like something else.

IMG_6012.png


Thank you, @MrCatPants for the spell check.
 
Last edited:
That said, i very much agree with your point still:
These are definitely not my favorite chips, but there is something to be said about having a cohesive set with the same inlay that does not require relabeling.

Phone number or not, original inlay is always better than relabeled imo. But if the relabels are much much better visually than original inlay it can be better when its all said and done.
 
Last edited:
Um, hahaha. I just saw this thread because @ekricket tagged me in it. I didn’t even know this sale was going on.

I have exactly two racks of those $5s that @TRKingChips sold me over 18 months ago. I absolutely hate them. They feel light, cheap and the inlay is hideous.

Rest easy that it wasn’t me. I think this was most likely someone who is in the resale business, and they should appear for sale pretty soon in sets.

View attachment 1212461

I bet @BamaT8ter would be willing to take those off your hands.
 
I bet @BamaT8ter would be willing to take those off your hands.
I think @Windwalker should just give you the chips @BamaT8ter. I mean Krish “absolutely hates them” and yet they sit in that cabinet mixed in with some of the rarest and other most desirable TRKs. :ROFL: :ROFLMAO:

Krish….
You need to fire that assistant who had the nerve to mix that garbage in amongst the rest of that beauty. ;)
SHEESH!
 
Also: simple/clean 414 edge spots and traditional colors for the $1's, $5's and $25's.

These are definitely not my favorite chips, but there is something to be said about having a cohesive set with the same inlay that does not require relabeling.
Totally. I don't think people should necessarily mistake criticism of the label as criticism of the chips as a whole.

The edge spots are "basic" but as you wrote, they're cohesive, excellent condition TRKs that don't NEED to be re-labelled before being used. That doesn't pop up every day.

Are they as attractive to me, personally, as say a modern Paulson THC set? No. Are they more attractive than say casino-used RHCs? Absolutely.

Different people like different things more or less than others. That's a good thing imo. This place would be awfully boring if we all loved exactly the same things.
 
I think @Windwalker should just give you the chips @BamaT8ter. I mean Krish “absolutely hates them” and yet they sit in that cabinet mixed in with some of the rarest and other most desirable TRKs. :ROFL: :ROFLMAO:

Krish….
You need to fire that assistant who had the nerve to mix that garbage in amongst the rest of that beauty. ;)
SHEESH!

I would not balk at this.
 
I sold the only TRK set I had a few years ago to a local friend. I imagine that I will have a set at some time in the future, but still haven’t found one that I absolutely love and can use for our game …

At under $3, this set was going to be an experiment. The inlay is unforgivably hideous with that phone number printed, but I figured it would be a reasonably decent relabel project, one of many on deck that may never get done… at substantially higher prices, with all the issues mentioned regarding inlay removal… pass for me … but to each their own
 
I sold the only TRK set I had a few years ago to a local friend. I imagine that I will have a set at some time in the future, but still haven’t found one that I absolutely love and can use for our game …

At under $3, this set was going to be an experiment. The inlay is unforgivably hideous with that phone number printed, but I figured it would be a reasonably decent relabel project, one of many on deck that may never get done… at substantially higher prices, with all the issues mentioned regarding inlay removal… pass for me … but to each their own
1697849366850.gif
 
I don't quite get it either. Can you elaborate @Windwalker ?

I don’t remember the chips being that weighty. When I unpacked them, I remember thinking they were insubstantial, not liking the inlay, and that I’d struggle to fit them into a mixed set. They then went into a closet.

Although a full set of them in all denoms is interesting. Not easy to find $500s in TRKs as well. I think it might be a decent starter set for anyone interested in TRKs.

I believe I know who spent the $45k, but will wait for them to reveal themselves after the initial PM deals are done.
 
How are there PM deals being done if we don't know who the buyer is?
I imagine it’s no different that a nagb. If it’s a member on here friends will get pm’s before a release to the general public or other members via pm who showed interest but with whom they maybe haven’t dealt with before?
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom