The $25s never seem to be the workhorse - learned something new! (2 Viewers)

doublebooyah85

Royal Flush
Supporter
Joined
Aug 2, 2021
Messages
10,140
Reaction score
25,692
Location
ohio
Pretty simple take. The $25 chip is never the workhorse chip in any NL or PLO game…

$1-$2 and $2-$5 NL or PLO (it’s the $5)

$5-$10, $10-$20, $20-$40 NL (it’s the $10 chip but really the $100)

MAYBE $5-$10 PLO?
Or $5-10-$25 PLO?

I feel like PLO games really never have a workhorse and it’s more chip/table/efficiency mgmt with ur chips…get as many high denoms in play you can…

I would still say the $100 is the workhorse in $5-$10 plo and up.

Reason for this discussion I recently built out a few cash game sets and after I went Booyah on $5s, two particular sets I went Booyah on $25s (25 x 400 100 x 200). Should have flipped that or at minimal 300 of the 25/100 each…
 
Last edited:
U will never need more than 2 rack of $25 for stake lower than 5/5

Even when I am playing 5/5 or 5/5/10 when straddle is on, I used & preferred 3 rack of $25 & $100 instead too

P.S. $25 are workhorse chip for 5/5, but then I also don't ever see the need for excess rack of workhorse chips. 4 rack is my limit and even thou 3 rack is still my preferred number for workhorse chip for a full ring table
 
Last edited:
Underground PLO game here where its a spread limit button straddle $5-25 no blinds w/ a $25 anytime bring in, and I said PLO but you can over bet and it’s on the callers to call it back to the pot size.

The $25 is the workhorse in this game.
 
I play a lot of 5/5/10-25. All my set ups have the same break down. Although I don’t use the $1s. Never had a problem.
IMG_1767.jpeg
 
Last edited:
No more than 200 of any denom is needed for a single table. One may think it looks cool, but playing with multiple racks of a work horse denom is unnecessary and inefficient.
Agree with this. I don't think you ever need more than a barrel of any denomination per player, and you can easily get away with less than that. That's no disrespect to the people with 10 racks of $5s in their set, I love an enormous chip stack, I just think for efficiency and budget minded players it's excessive.

I made my limit set to get 100+ chips per player onto the table, so I don't have to spread $25 buy ins in all quarters to get the chip count up haha
 
No more than 200 of any denom is needed for a single table. One may think it looks cool, but playing with multiple racks of a work horse denom is unnecessary and inefficient.
You are right for a short handed table ;-)
 
In the $1/$2 NLHE game I play, the $25 chip is used to manage stack sizes. Hundreds are used in place of $25's later in the evening and once in a while $500 chips find there way onto the felt.

For me, I dislike having huge amount of chips in front of me. I would rather have a barrel of $25's than five extra barrels of $5's. As a poker player, I think leaning towards efficiency is a natural part of the evolutionary process. It is fun to have piles of chips in front of you when the game is new whereas a seasoned player prefers having the extra space to peek at his cards and is not impressed by the number of chips on the table as much as he is the dollars.

I only have experience in playing in two $2/$5 PLO games. In the larger of the two, the $5's and $25's were used as the workhorse chips.

I have built my sets to spread $1/$1 to $2/$5 NLHE/PLO across nine players (PLO) to ten players (NLHE). The breakdown I went with for my sets is 100/$1's, 400/$5's, 200/$25's, 100/$100's. I have yet to host a $2/$5 game. If I should at some point, and it becomes a regular event, I will hunt down/add a barrel of $500's if needed.
 
Last edited:
For my NL 5/10 game I usually go for:
5 x 200
25 x 400
100 x 2-300

So the 25 is absolutely my workhorse but I'm guessing casinos have a lot of volume of 25s on table games (?) so they don't want to dump 15-20 racks on the poker room and risk going empty on the table games section (?). (Just making up my own narrative here to fit the story.)
 
In the $1/$2 NLHE game I play, the $25 chip is used to manage stack sizes. Hundreds are used in place of $25's later in the evening and once in a while $500 chips find there way onto the felt.

For me, I dislike having huge amount of chips in front of me. I would rather have a barrel of $25's than five extra barrels of $5's. As a poker player, I think leaning towards efficiency is a natural part of the evolutionary process. It is fun to have piles of chips in front of you when the game is new whereas a seasoned player prefers having the extra space to peek at his cards and is not impressed by the number of chips on the table as much as he is the dollars.

I only have experience in playing in two $2/$5 PLO games. In the larger of the two, the $5's and $25's were used as the workhorse chips.

I have built my sets to spread $1/$1 to $2/$5 NLHE/PLO across nine players (PLO) to ten players (NLHE). The breakdown I went with for my sets is 100/$1's, 400/$5's, 200/$25's, 100/$100's. I have yet to host a $2/$5 game. If I should at some point, and it becomes a regular event, I will hunt down/add a barrel of $500's if needed.
If I have at least ~3 barrels it helps me to stay calm when I loose a couple of hands in a row.
 
Agree that this is mostly a symptom of using racks and racks of $5s. If you're making a $200 bet all in $5s when would you use the $25? I've never seen someone slide 40 $1s forward for a bet at 1/1 or 1/2 haha.
Play in CA at the Bike or Commerce and you’ll see people slide in full racks of $1s. It’s bizarre.
 
I use alot of 5’s in my 1/2 game. When the 25’s come out the game tends to turn into a 5/10 game. I usually wait till late in the night to chip up players that have 3+ barrels of 5’s in front of them.
My single table bank
1x140
5x700
25x140
100x20
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom