Tourney POLL: PCF hosts. Largest tournament size (1 Viewer)

What is the largest tournament (in terms of tables) you have ever hosted.

  • Single table only

    Votes: 9 10.1%
  • 2 tables

    Votes: 29 32.6%
  • 3 tables

    Votes: 19 21.3%
  • 4 tables

    Votes: 10 11.2%
  • 5 tables

    Votes: 9 10.1%
  • 6 tables or more

    Votes: 13 14.6%

  • Total voters
    89

JustinInMN

4 of a Kind
Joined
May 23, 2017
Messages
5,980
Reaction score
7,618
Rewards
310
Location
Savage, MN
Wanted to take the pulse of all the PCF hosts, what is the largest tournament (in terms of tables) you have ever hosted?

I have done two tables on several occasions, I could squeeze 3 tables in my space if needed, but haven't tried that yet. I am wondering how many have directed tournaments larger than that, or how many are around my level of attendance.

If you have done more than 3 tables, do you still do everything on your own or what sort of help do you get?
 
Last edited:
We host our once a month games at an archery club. We regularly have seven tables. Our kickoff event had 98 players in September. We average about 65 to 75
Yikes, you must have help at this level? What tasks do you delegate?
 
62 players spread over 7 tables. TD on a laptop is a must have. Connect it to multiple TVs and use audio events to communicate end of round and new blind levels. The herd will hear it and react accordingly.

Seating cards are a must have and easy to make yourself.
4b83864c-b2b6-4158-bc92-6bea56b4eac2-1_all_204.webp

Put one at each seat and hand them the other when they buy in. Trying to get the herd to find where they belong in the beginning is impossible otherwise.

The buyin station requires 3 people. First person takes money (trusted friend). Second person adds them to TD and gives them their seating card (me). Third person gives them their starting stack (any volunteer) that I already premade and have in pill bottles, so they just hand each person one bottle. Place an empty cardboard box at each table and the herd will toss the seating cards and empty pill bottles in the cardboard boxes. The tournament director (me) isn't going to be able to play, but TD on the laptop will handle table breakdowns for you if you set it up properly.
 
I’ve hosted 2 tables at my home and acted as TD for a 3 player tournament while also playing (not ideal). Even with just 2 tables, it’s a lot of work to both play and host.
 
I don't mean that I will never host a Meetup again. I probably will never host a tournament again. As it looks, I won't be hosting a Meetup in 2026
 
Five tables, 45 players. I was never so busy, even though I didn't try to play. So much work before the event and afterwards. And I am doing it without compensation. It was fun, but . . . . . . .

I came to believe the amount of work / trouble grows faster than the head count. Two tables were a walk in the park. Five tables? No, not doing that again. -=- DrStrange
 
I can play in a 3 table tournament and floor it as long as it is not a rebuy tournament.

2 tables is a walk in the park.

There is something about that 4th table where peak points get almost unmanageable. 5th table you need an extra floor.
 
How many ppl at a table? Like a bunch of 6max may be less than three 10max
 
I routinely do 2 tables while playing without dedicated help. I am doing bounties and rebuys and handle everything. I sometimes forget to reload the hot dog roller before the break so they are ready during break, or switch the TV to whatever game people are wanting :wow:, and occasionally extend the break so I can go tuck the kids into bed before I color everyone up. But game wise everything is fine.

I feel like 3 would not be that much harder but 4 I would either have dedicated help or I would not play. Thankfully I don't have space for that many in my basement
 
5 tables on 2 floors with 42 players in a 1200 sq foot condo we were actively trying to sell. That was stupid.

5 tables in a basement with 38 players. That was fun. And unbelievably loud. But fun.

Nowadays in AZ, 3 tables, 24 players. I could prolly do 4 tables and get to 28 players but that’s as big as I want to go with the floor plan I have.
 
5 tables on 2 floors with 42 players in a 1200 sq foot condo we were actively trying to sell. That was stupid.

5 tables in a basement with 38 players. That was fun. And unbelievably loud. But fun.

Nowadays in AZ, 3 tables, 24 players. I could prolly do 4 tables and get to 28 players but that’s as big as I want to go with the floor plan I have.
I probably have about 900-1000 usable square feet of space in my basement. Two tables is comfortable, 3 would be a squeeze, but doable. I can't imagine trying 5 tables.
 
Just had this conversation today with a player. Regularly run 3-table tourneys (24 player max). Player asked if I ever thought about adding a 4th table. I said, not happening. I would not be able to play with a 4-table tourney.

3 tables is already some work. Your individual play definitely suffers due to the distractions. Looking at asking 3-4 guys to assist in future games to help lighten the load.

When we host a cash game only, it’s like a whole new world. Easy street! Haha!
 
Myself and the backer used to run the annual NLH tourney at our city’s yearly celebration. The event often ran past 12 tables and was a no-entry fee, chip for chip affair. In the last few years because it was for fun and the plethora of prizes to the winners, we started “halfing” the stacks and resetting the blinds at different points.

The backer was the tabling up guru while I had the mic and was the entertainment.

Good times.

At my previous space we’ve spread three table tournies and in my current space I’ve done two table games.
 
4 tables (6 per table) during COVID, where we played shorthanded to social-distance better.

6 tables at a meet-up, but that's almost cheating because nearly all (if not all) attendees are hosts and know how to color up.

3 tables on the regular. Having @Jonesey07 and of course @Mrs Poker Zombie as players helps considerably.

The toughest parts are color-ups and table balancing. If you have novice players you may need to also make rulings, which is unfair to your table when you have to pause while you replay a hand at another table before making a ruling.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom