2026 Poll - Cash or Tournament? (2 Viewers)

Cash or Tournament?

  • Cash Game

    Votes: 104 78.2%
  • Tournament

    Votes: 29 21.8%

  • Total voters
    133

CraigT78

Royal Flush
Supporter Pro
Joined
Aug 4, 2015
Messages
19,836
Reaction score
60,379
Rewards
261
Location
Dallas
I know this has been asked before, but it's 2026 and people's minds change!

What do you prefer for a night of poker with friends?

Cash game or Tournament?

I was thinking about this last night on how I think I really prefer just playing cash games as I'm folding 37 hands straight in my NLHE tournament.

So what does 2026 say for PCF?
 
I voted tournaments only because my group has never had a cash game night, but I want to change that and I have a sneaky suspicion that cash games will become more popular.

And I think for many people tournaments attract a casual crowd who would like a tournament more, whereas cash attracts the poker players who would rather play cash or mixed games. And I think the reasons are obvious.
 
Started off with tournaments and quickly pivoted to cash games almost exclusively. Tourneys made it so people left early (once they busted). While cash allowed everyone to play as long as they wanted. Cash just generally has more action because people aren’t nitting up trying to make the money.

With friends, cash is king imo.
 
Last edited:
Why Dont We Have Both GIF
 
I just love tournaments because....... WTF am I saying. :mad::wtf:

2026 or 2010, it's Cash game always FTW. :cool

If....... you're going to have both I'm in agreement to do the cash game first and finish the night with a tournament. That way if I go busto at cash instead of waiting around for the tournament to start up I can go home...
 
I prefer tournament poker by a lot. But a home game with friends? Cash, no doubt.
 
Cash games reward better players more consistently and I think is a better test of skill.

Tournaments mainly reward one strategy, tight. And this is because in terms of distance from neutral, the penalty for losing is chips is much greater than the reward for winning chips.

So passing on small edges and playing tight is only rational. Even if counter-strategy to this might show reward, the downside is too great to pursue this consistently.

Cash games are a better test of all skills. Adjusting to opponents, reading situations, etc...

That said tournaments are popular, and tournaments are the main reason poker had a boom 25 years ago. I am glad to recognize that, and I will host a few during the year.

But which form requires a broader range of skills, it's cash by far.
 
Cash. Tournaments suck, what do you do when you lose?
Move over to the cash table of course!

I like cash games for a weeknight, when people leave when they have to.
Tournaments are great for one Saturday a month, start around 4pm, eat dinner when it gets down to the final table then play to a winner around 9 and people can hang out and play cash (with the early busters) or socialize until like 11, and it's a fun, full day.
 
I voted CASH but I think it's very close.

The issue I have with tournaments is not the structure of the game itself. In fact, I think intellectually, tournaments have a lot more to offer than cash. It contains all the same elements of cash (except hours playing deep stack poker) and introduces a host of other elements to the game. It is way more complex than cash games.

The issue I have with tournaments are two, which I understand cannot be separated from the good aspects of tourney: time commitment and uncertainty of entertainment hours (since we are talking about a night with friends). As far as the former goes, one does not have the ability to come and go as one pleases, or even to take breaks as every hand matters to the final outcome. To the later, it is very frustrating to be waiting for a night of poker with friend and bust out right after the re-buy period ends.

Because of those two things, the balance leans towards cash. However, once one is committed to a large tourney, the intricacies of that kind of poker cannot be compared to cash, imo.

So maybe in other words, purely from an intellectual puzzle exercise, tourney by a mile. From an entertainment perspective, which is more in line with the question, cash is king.
 
Last edited:
I voted cash for obvious reasons; more social, player group typically stays longer, but I do have a heart for tournament play under the right circumstances.

Each of my two games I’ve run, spanning over 600 sessions total between the two chapters, have started with tournament play. Tournaments allowed for me to build a deep pool of poker enthusiasts and expose them to home games. As it became obvious who wanted to play regularly, the transition to cash began.

Because there is an appetite for intermittent tourney play, I initiated the Godfather Club Championship Series which was a tournament series intended to identify our club’s champion. This monthly offering, complete with Dr. Neau’s complicated points system (the best system BTW) was a great opportunity to mix up what we do here at GFC while looking to crown our champion. The series lost this opportunity when the location was hit with devastating parking problems due to road reconfiguration. With the change to shorter tables (mainly parking) and the outpouring of opinion toward the big bank the Executive Game had evolved into (resulting in the creation of the micro game), the decision to place the club series on hold and focus on Micro Night has taken precedent.

Because tournaments do serve a purpose beyond generating a deep player pool and identifying a club champion, we’ve developed a tourney structure that serves all aspects of poker night. It involves a deep stack format, non-sluggish blind timer, low entry fee with full stack rebuys the first hour and an add-on opportunities, and appreciable, non-handicapping rebuys and add-ons into subsequent hours. The rationale, which is completely counterintuitive in tourney play, is to keep players at the table a little longer.

Ours is now a social game, but as previously mentioned, has an appetite for occasional tourney play. Because we will roll these deep-stack events so infrequently (even Micro Night is now only 2 times a month with life and golf, which is life BTW) there is talk about creating "The People's Championship", a points-based series (Hello Dr. Neau) because who doesn’t like looking at a leaderboard…

Tourneys are good for:
Cultivating a player pool
Identifying a club champion
Offering a change of pace
Among other things I’m sure

They can be:
Grindy and less social
A short night for some
Void of the fun of reckless play

Cash games are for:
True degens
Those who like to mix playing styles
Providing intermittent rewards
Keeping players at the table
Promoting a social atmosphere

The can be:
Financially prohibitive
A little wild for some

Done properly, both entities can coexist in a groups orbit and when done brilliantly, a tournament can bring the best of all worlds together in a single serving.

Now everyone take a lap.
 
Last edited:
Tournaments add more excitement and a sense of urgency. And in our group no one plays or knows how to really play any game other than NLHE. This past weekend we played a cash game and I introduced bomb pots (which I learned from his forum) and it confused all of the players for the first two rounds. Maybe if we incorporated different types of games I would be able to see what all the excitement is with these various games.
 
2026 Poll - Cash or Tournament?

Answer: Yes

I'll do both. I have 18-26'ish players and will plan tourneys when I can get most of them. Only a handful like cash so will have 5-8 for those.
 
Tournament poker was popular because of the 2003-4 boom and so many people being exposed to it that way. Myself and three buddies ran many (7 to 8 a year) very well organized and successful large tournaments over the course of 8 years. The tourneys would start at noon and usually end by 6pm.

That being said……While they were very fun, most looked forward to the cash games that formed as people got knocked out. Often two tables playing until 2am or later. I haven’t hosted a tournament (though I may be getting a new tournament set 🤦🏻) in 12 years but my cash game has grown and become pretty regular.

Cash was and always will be KING
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom