Paulson chips for PCF (1 Viewer)

[Pinkdan]

What’s the % chance that Paulson would make PCF a unique set of chips if the order was large enough...?

 

[Perthmike]

 

[DZPoker]

I’m assuming there’s a Casino out there with the initials PCF you’re referring to?

 

[JMC9389]

Under current circumstances, 0%.

In the world of chipping, poker, and gambling though, never say never.

 

[Pinkdan]

A guys gotta dream, c’mon

 

[ChipFinderSK]

I like the optimism in the poll choices (very apropos on Election Day), but the answer is unfortunately a lot closer to 0 than any other option.

 

[Pinkdan]

Welp, thanks for indulging me everyone. I just wanted to make sure before I took my hopes and dreams out back to be shot

 

[Highli99]

If 1% was an option is have picked that.

 

[Pinkdan]

If 1% was an option is have picked that.

Added it

 

[detroitdad]

If 1% was an option is have picked that.

still wait to high

 

[pacmartine]

If the question is will someone figure out a way to get chips made, I think there’s a real chance. If you asking if they’ll do it for us. Not without a casino.

 

[Pinkdan]

If the question is will someone figure out a way to get chips made, I think there’s a real chance. If you asking if they’ll do it for us. Not without a casino.

thank you, this makes a lot of sense

 

[pacmartine]

The NAGB is strong within the PCF methinks.

 

[Chipandchair]

Lol to 90% and 100% being options

 

[BGinGA]

What’s the % chance that Paulson would make PCF a unique set of chips if the order was large enough...?

Slightly less than the chances of you a) buying GPI from Angel Holdings and then b) sucessfully changing their sales policies while c) still adhering to their regulatory requirements. Order size is pretty much irrelevant.

Of the choices you listed, I picked 0% as being closest.

 

[Mr Winberg]

I picked 100%.

The question was "if the order was large enough [for GPI to actually make a PCF set]". Well, if it's large enough, then per definition, it is large enough! Like asking the chances of having a full house if flopping a full house!

 

[DZPoker]

I picked 100%.

The question was "if the order was large enough [for GPI to actually make a PCF set]". Well, if it's large enough, then per definition, it is large enough! Like asking the chances of having a full house if flopping a full house!

Only if size is the single restriction to whether a set can/will be created?

 

[allforcharity]

I picked 100%.

The question was "if the order was large enough [for GPI to actually make a PCF set]". Well, if it's large enough, then per definition, it is large enough! Like asking the chances of having a full house if flopping a full house!

Okay, so let's speculate on what "large enough" is. I'll start the bidding at 100,000,000 chips.

 

[BGinGA]

A million chips might get their attention, but just barely. And certainly not enough to change policy.

 

[FDLmold]

New ownership. I picked 1%. It's a long shot.

 

[Mr Winberg]

Only if size is the single restriction to whether a set can/will be created?

The question was "if the order is large enough". So even though there are other restrictions: Would GPI be willing to make a PCF set if we place an order that is large enough to trump those restrictions so that they would be willing to make a PCF set? The answer is yes! ;-)

Look, I'm just trolling, don't feed the troll. It's early hours here in Sweden and I haven't had breakfast yet.

 

[Mysticum]

As the question is formulated, 100% is the only valid option, as @Mr Winberg says. It literally says that it is "large enough", so it's not a question even. Doesn't matter if that number is 1 chip or 1 googolplexian.

 

[Mr Winberg]

I had to dig a bit, checking the GPI website and some of the Angel Holdings websites. Lo and behold, I'm definitely no lawyer but I think there might just be a loophole here!
http://angelplayingcards.com/en_wholesale/clients2.php

 

[Thomacetti]

Discussion is moot.... PCF finding consensus on how that chipset has to look < getting order in

 

[cpac54]

I had to dig a bit, checking the GPI website and some of the Angel Holdings websites. Lo and behold, I'm definitely no lawyer but I think there might just be a loophole here!
http://angelplayingcards.com/en_wholesale/clients2.php

Goddammit... I can’t believe I fell for that.

 

[BGinGA]

Hover..... always hover......

 

[TheBigTater]

 

[DZPoker]

As the question is formulated, 100% is the only valid option, as @Mr Winberg says. It literally says that it is "large enough", so it's not a question even. Doesn't matter if that number is 1 chip or 1 googolplexian.

Sorry but this just isn’t true...it implies size is the only aspect that matters.

“What’s the % chance that a visor would keep my hair dry in a thunderstorm if the size was large enough to fit my head...?”

Not only will a large enough one let water through...I might even be bald

 

[Mysticum]

Sorry but this just isn’t true...it implies size is the only aspect that matters.

I understand what you mean, size might have nothing to do with it, but nevertheless, it is the only logical outcome.

The if statement clearly states that the outcome only counts if, and only if, a certain condition is "enough". Unless that word has a very different meaning than I think, this directly translates to "if X condition is true".

You are absolutely correct that size might be totally irrelevant, but from a strict logical point of view, there is really no discussion here.

--

Besides those points, the answer to the correct size might be 1 if you pay enough money. I know nothing about the policy in place, but I think they would sell 1 regular chip to anyone if they offered $100'000'000'000'000'000.

 

[GianThaMan]

Besides those points, the answer to the correct size might be 1 if you pay enough money. I know nothing about the policy in place, but I think they would sell 1 regular chip to anyone if they offered $100'000'000'000'000'000.

That’s about a billion times more than you would need to spend to buy the entire company. Not a very wise investment, IMO.