If we're honest, most of the NHL awards are based 50% purely on reputation.
If we're honest, most of the NHL awards are based 50% purely on reputation.
Totally agree, but you look like an amateur league when you do this kind of stuff IMO. St Louis should have gotten it over Cooper. What is the legit reason Cooper was chosen, other than "he was due"?If we're honest, most of the NHL awards are based 50% purely on reputation.
You're preaching to the choir, man.Totally agree, but you look like an amateur league when you do this kind of stuff IMO. St Louis should have gotten it over Cooper. What is the legit reason Cooper was chosen, other than "he was due"?
A fuckin menYou're preaching to the choir, man.
IMO, they should strip voting rights from most of the hockey writers who have a say in these awards (or at minimum, make voting public)
I'm still salty over Joe Thornton winning MVP in 2006 over Jagr. To this day is one of the biggest award voting travesties in my book.You're preaching to the choir, man.
IMO, they should strip voting rights from most of the hockey writers who have a say in these awards.
And forget about St. Louis (though he would have been a reasonable recipient). Where tf was Ruff in the voting? He should have won by a landslide imo.A fuckin men
The NHL loves that, same way they love recycling GM's and coaches.What is the legit reason Cooper was chosen, other than "he was due"?
These are the same numbers I see on the NHL's website:My buddy sent me this, don't know the source.
View attachment 1687186
Maybe Anaheim too, possibly?