Controversial Chip & Poker Opinions (115 Viewers)

[upNdown]

I don’t follow. I’m saying overlabels annoy me like trying to match textured labels.

Matching shiny glossy flat labels come out great.

Oh okay. I missed your point.
I was saying that not-textured over labels on textured clay is no different than the way Paulson currently produces chips where the clay is textured and the inlay is not.

 

[toothpic]

I've always been a poker player who appreciates nice chips. I don't think I'm a full on chipper because for the most part, I'm not big on where the chips are from or the history behind the chips (some what but not high on my list at least).

I care about having a complete set that plays well, looks good, and feels nice. If I was no longer playing poker, I wouldn't be as interested in or keep so many sets.

That said, I still appreciate and will avoid any permanent change on harder to find/more rare chips because I get how hard it is to complete a set sometimes. Some sets just require it though since there are some denoms that aren't available in quantity. Also when the chips need a shaped inlay to match with other sets, your options become much more limited so I understand the chip reassignment work done with some hot stamps.

 

[Deucekies]

Just imagine someone buying a Rio WSOP set and murdering it.

 

[Jacks]

Just imagine someone buying a Rio WSOP set and murdering it.

Oh man…you don’t think this was a good idea??

 

[Jacks]

View attachment 1695871
Oh man…you don’t think this was a good idea??

Lmao that I told ChatGPT to make it “cheesy” and it took that literally. Humanity still has a hope.

 

[BPTDirector]

Why buy those anyway? After all they are the lesser RHC chips all the snobs hated until now.

 

[Budha]

RHC’s just make me angry (including RIO WSOP’s).

 

[Tonysquander]

RHC’s just make me angry (including RIO WSOP’s).