You don't need to be so hostile. My information is just very different than yours, so Im questioning the facts.
I hear it said time and time again that certain people who were carrying a grudge went to GPI and shut down the boat buys. Besides Snoop, I have never heard anyone admit to this and have never seen any evidence of the fact. From what I can tell, One member made a very stupid threat about exposing the Boat buys to GPI, and the organizers perceived enough risk that they cancelled a large Paulson buy that was in the works, and instead proceeded with another much smaller buy for the Pacific Star Bud Jones chips. I have never heard anyone say that GPI actually shut down the orders or sent any kind of cease and desist.
If anyone can send me any evidence to support your version of events, either openly or via PM, Id be happy to change my tune and support your narrative. Otherwise, Im sick of the trend in our country to accept any story as fact, just because some dimwit is willing to say it out loud.
Your bias is evident in your post, and that's fine. You are already trying to dismiss the threat as "stupid." I guess we're all just supposed to take it as some comedy between "friends." And yet the only alternative you'll accept is a "cease and desist" order, which no one ever mentioned - anywhere (not really sure where that came from actually). It's ironic that you're so sick of people in this country selling any story as fact, when you're guilty of twisting your own story to satisfy your ends.
But it seems there are some facts we do not dispute:
Fact: some one sent a PM discussing outside contact to GPI about the boat buys, while the transaction was in progress.
Fact: same said person suggested (in the same PM) "canceling" the order so friends and acquaintances of theirs involved would not "lose money."
Fact: screengrabs of this PM exist, but it's not my place to post it. And it sounds like you've already seen it yourself.
When any such threat or email is received, it can only be taken at face value, which means it has to be taken as fact. The repercussions of that PM cannot be ignored, and I refuse to pass it off as "stupid," "silly," or just some "chip-bro" humor. It had malicious intent, with only a single malicious goal in mind.
Sure, anyone can come back 18 months later and say, "oh, about that PM, it was just a joke bro! lol-lery!"
I don't know about you, but I don't go around pretending to mess around with my friends' quarter-million dollar deals. Maybe you do. Maybe that's just "chipper-bro" lulz for you. If so, we'll just have to agree to disagree, because that's not how I treat friends, or anyone in this community.
Carry on with your "fact" peddling.