AK in late stages of a NLHE tournament, gets re-raised by Villain (11 Viewers)

What do you do after the three-bat by villain?

  • Fold

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Flat

    Votes: 15 34.1%
  • Raise (but less than jam)

    Votes: 2 4.5%
  • Jam

    Votes: 27 61.4%

  • Total voters
    44
All I know is that if I'm the SB I'm licking my chops at this action

Happy Chris Pratt GIF
 
Let's say Villain folds 80% of his 3-bets to a shove, our EV there is 65K. On the 20% we get call, we need barely any equity, like 10%. I think we can get there with enough QQs, KK and AKs. We should have around 40% if he calls with all of those.
 
Last edited:
Let's say Villain folds 80% of his 3-bets to a shove, our EV there is 80K. On the 20% we get call, we need an equity of around $80+, which is around 25% of our 320K. I think we can get there with enough QQs, KK and AKs. We should have around 40% if he calls with all of those. Is the difference between 40% and 25% enough to compensate for the ICM? I think so...

That is way to much math my friend!
 
At under 30bb effective and 3-handed, AKs should be in hero's value 4bet range. Of course it sucks that villain has us covered, which is why I'd maximize our fold equity by shoving all 4bets in this spot. If hero calls the SPR will be too low to really take advantage of position anyway.
 
At the end of the day AK is two cards in a seven card game. I can double up later if the flop comes poorly for me if I flat, if I push I’m out with no chance of playing my way back in.
 
At the end of the day AK is two cards in a seven card game. I can double up later if the flop comes poorly for me if I flat, if I push I’m out with no chance of playing my way back in.
Never change this mindset, damn whippersnappers betting preflop! Just trap, you'll make them pay.

(Kidding. I get that AK looks draw-ish and there's merit to staying alive for sure.)
 
What’s your retirement funding situation? Have you been displined with low cost index funds and a dollar cost averaged approach, or did you YOLO your nest egg away with crypto bets and speculative meme stonks?

Your answer to the above affects how aggressive we can be.
 
Why? Avoiding tough decisions? Interesting point though. I think about this when it comes to late registration, putting a premium on being fresh.
Yeah just not trusting myself to not get outplayed or give away my standing in the hand if head is throbbing. Que sera sera at that point. I know I'm not going to beat myself up too bad about an AK getting it in preflop with 15ish effective BBs given the antes.
 
That’s wrong thinking. You’re just ahead at the onset. Ive seen a lot of suckouts against AK when shoving with two cards pre flop.

:ROFL: :ROFLMAO:

No, it’s not. You’re dominating those hands, that’s how you win in poker.

Based on your reasoning AA is only ahead of 53o until the flop if 953. So AA are not a made hand also?

The whole concept of a made hand is bogus. It’s about the equity of your hand vs your opponents range.
 
Last edited:
A pair is a made hand. AK loses to 22 if it doesn’t hit a card to pair up or make a straight. FYI - I win more than variance says I should.
 
A pair is a made hand. AK loses to 22 if it doesn’t hit a card to pair up or make a straight. FYI - I win more than variance says I should.
AK is a made hand vs AQ if AQ doesn’t hit a card. It’s the exact same thing. Call it what you want.

There are tons of instances in PLO, fewer in Holden, in which big draws have way more equity than a made hand, even a good one at that, like a set. No one in their right mind would pick a hand with significantly lower equity vs a high equity draw just because it’s already ‘made’.
 
A pair is a made hand. AK loses to 22 if it doesn’t hit a card to pair up or make a straight. FYI - I win more than variance says I should.
No doubt. Though equity-wise, AK might actually be ahead. And when you figure in the other guy’s fold equity, it’s way ahead.
Edit - just checked equity calculator - 22 is ahead.
 
I have played it both ways, so I’ll quit this debate. It just depends I guess on circumstances, read on the other player, etc.
 
I have played it both ways, so I’ll quit this debate. It just depends I guess on circumstances, read on the other player, etc.

Oh, I’m not arguing if it’s a call or a shove at all. That’s close in the OP’s case because of ICM, otherwise, it’s a no brainer shove with AK, solvers show you that on that stack depth.
 
Late stages of a $200 buyin, 29-person NLHE home tournament. Three players left, we are on the button.

Hero (button): ~350K in chips
3rd player (SB): ~200K in chips
Villain (BB): ~450K in chips
Blinds (IIRC) were 6K/12K with a 12K BBA. Blind structure is slow after the dinner break, with longer levels. We have been playing ~10 hours at this point.

First place: $2830
Second place: $1650
Third place: $890

Villain is a solid player, more TAG than LAG, but he has gotten caught playing a hand fast in position. A few hands previous, villain raised PF on the button, and hero called. Hero hit TPTK on the flop and checked. Villain bet $50,000 and we check-raise shoved. Villain's actions made it clear that it was just a c-bet, that he had at best a missed draw, and he folded.

In this hand, hero is on the button and finds AK suited and min-clicks to $25K (2xBB). SB folds and BB raises to 50K (4xBB) again.

If we win this hand, we have 70% of the chips in play and a good shot at taking down the tournament, but there is also a $750 ladder up to 2nd place (~4 buyins).

Should hero just flat and take a flop in position? Should hero 4-bet AK to see where he's at? Regardless of your action, what is your plan for future streets?
just flat...play it low variance.
If you don't hit the flop...let it go...
Your chip advantage is too big vs third spot.

First secure a heads-up and make a deal (boooooooh) or consider it a freeroll to first place....or grind it out if you think your have a skill advantage.
 
The vote seems 60/40 in favor of jamming over flatting (with an outlier vote for raise less than all in... some people like to see the world burn). 0% fold. I think that's exactly where it should be.

If you guys saw my post in the other thread, you already know what happened. I jammed and Villain rolled over QQ. The board did not improve my hand, and I was out in 3rd.

My thought was to play for the win. If I take this pot down, I have 70% of the chips in play and solidly in the driver's seat. I don't regret my play because it gave me the best chance to win, IMO. But I've been thinking all weekend that I gave the short stack and extra $750 by busting out here. And I've been wondering if there was any chance to get away here and try to secure the $750 ladder up, or if that play is just too soft/exploitable. Flop was a complete whiff, so if I did just flat, and he bets/shoves flop, I can maybe get away from this hand losing only about 15% of my stack.

After this hand, Villain had 80% of the chips on the table and I assume he won the tournament.
 
Last edited:
The vote seems 60/40 in favor of jamming over flat58ng (with an outlier vote for raise less than all in... some people like to see the world burn). 0% fold. I think that's exactly where it should be.

If you guys saw my post in the other thread, you already know what happened. I jammed and Villain rolled over QQ. The board did not improve my hand, and I was out in 3rd.

My thought was to play for the win. If I take this pot down, I have 70% of the chips in play and solidly in the driver's seat. I don't regret my play because it gave me the best chance to win, IMO. But I've been thinking all weekend that I gave the short stack and extra $750 by busting out here. And I've been wondering if there was any chance to get away here and try to secure the $750 ladder up, or if that play is just too soft/exploitable. Flop was a complete whiff, so if I did just flat, and he bets/shoves flop, I can maybe get away from this hand losing only about 15% of my stack.

After this hand, Villain had 80% of the chips on the table and I assume he won the tournament.
Would you do the same thing with pocket jacks?
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom