Having made custom tuck boxes in the past, I noticed not all decks of cards are exactly 2.5” x 3.5” for poker-size or 2.25” x 3.5” for bridge-size. Some brands are a bit shorter / taller, or wider / narrower.
So cut cards will not often be an exact fit to the playing cards they're used with. That being said, if you've noticed this too (or you'll start noticing it going forward), do you prefer / think it's better for a cut card to be slightly undersized or oversized? Probably depends on the grip one takes when dealing.
I just ordered some cut cards for a mini-GB and I made them just slightly undersized, rounding down to the nearest millimeter (88mm / 3.464" tall, and 57mm / 2.244" wide for bridge or 63mm / 2.48" wide for poker). I don't think it'll be a problem because most playing cards, if they're not exact size, are usually slightly smaller too.
So cut cards will not often be an exact fit to the playing cards they're used with. That being said, if you've noticed this too (or you'll start noticing it going forward), do you prefer / think it's better for a cut card to be slightly undersized or oversized? Probably depends on the grip one takes when dealing.
I just ordered some cut cards for a mini-GB and I made them just slightly undersized, rounding down to the nearest millimeter (88mm / 3.464" tall, and 57mm / 2.244" wide for bridge or 63mm / 2.48" wide for poker). I don't think it'll be a problem because most playing cards, if they're not exact size, are usually slightly smaller too.