In slow motion everything looks dramatic. But no Danish player touched the ball, yet there was contact. In the modern game any contact in that area is dangerous, yes its soft, I dont particularly like it, but hey ho, the decision was done.
Yes Wenger and Mourinho have opinions, but relevant ones? In my opinion, not really, neither has played themselves at the top level and both come from a time when tackles/contact was common. I cant imagine either of themselves to be able to dribble at pace, carrying the ball and if they have contact, stay up.
I agree the 2 balls on the pitch was not good. But if play stops automatically as a rule. Then what precedent does that set going forward? If a team is counter attacking, some ball boy decides he doesnt want the team to score, let me throw a ball on the pitch? Home advantage would be ridiculous since it would be local ball boys that decide to stop the play.
I agree the laser was as scummy thing to do.
Lets not forgot the freekick for the Dane goal was questionable? FIFA Rules: "Where three or more defending team players form a 'wall, all attacking team players must remain at least 1m (1 yrd) from the 'wall' until the ball is in play," That was clearly not the case. Yes the freekick itself was superb, I cannot deny that was a quality shot. But the wall in front was illegal.
https://resources.fifa.com/image/up...game-2020-21.pdf?cloudid=d6g1medsi8jrrd3e4imp
We can cherry pick everything, but decisions went for and against on both sides, but it seems when England gets a decision, the rest of the world forgets everything else.