Not trying to get myself branded as a villainous radical who respects statistics but…
it seems to me your demographic does relate to this particular case. As with eg the housing market, because the cost of things has only steadily outpaced increases in wages, being older would correlate with a time when generally things people wanted were more accessible.
Not for everyone, not all things, not at every given time. But as a general trend. Which is what big data like demographics cares about. I don’t know the guy but I doubt @BigGrizz cares about the particular financial situation of any one person here. General trends folks.
In 2010, a X quality chip set cost Y% of median income. Today it certainly costs a much higher percent. So yes, someone in their 50’s or 60’s, is more likely to have had the opportunity to purchase chips at a cheaper price relative to their income than anyone trying to buy chips today. So if someone is older and has a nicer chip collection, we can’t determine it is because that one person is older, but it might be a non trivial likelihood of explain why a lot of older chippers might have better collections
Oh, I agree that age correlates with the collections (although not perfectly obv.). And I also agree with the likelihood that the average income around here tends to be above that in other less expensive hobbies/collectable. As the car collection community income should be higher than ours. As I said, I think it should be almost a given. Three to four figures chip sets are insane proposition to 99.99% of people.
The slight problem, for lack of a better word, I have with it, is that it does not explain why the market was hot a year ago (or two, or whatever) and now it's not (arguably), the question the OP presented. So has the demographics changed significantly in the last year? That was my point, not the absolute, but the delta.
The other point that I didn't make (didn't want to make) is that I am not a fan of dividing the community in young, old, rich, poor, private sector, state employee, so on and so forth endlessly... Especially when gross generalizations are made (they often are) on each one of those. It is a source of fragmentation and not unity and it does not help our understanding.
Last edited: