Today's Banner Ad (11 Viewers)


rkgKOKv.png


I just had to click through to find out what this is ... anyone who doesn't know already fancy having a guess?



UK ASA (Advertising Standards Authority) not liking these at all.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-67272541

Temu adverts banned for sexualising a child and objectifying women

The online retailer Temu has had an advert banned for sexualising a child.
It showed a girl aged between eight and 11 wearing a bikini in a pose that was "was quite adult for a girl of her age", the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said.

...

The images which received complaints included those of women's torsos in low-cut dresses, a grey jockstrap and padded cycling underwear.
The ASA ruled that the jockstrap emphasised "the outline of the genitalia" while the cycling shorts "appeared as underwear with the bottom cut out".

...

Furthermore, pictures of a facial roller and balloon ties "were phallic in shape and appeared sexual in nature" when shown alongside the other ads.


edit:
And as if by magic I get served

xnPixFM.png


of which "Temu said that the pictures of the models with their faces cut off were not meant to objectify women"
 
Last edited:
Highly relevant as I always have a bottle of this on hand now, great whiskey
1714011975543.png
 
Found on FB not here... but now I definitely don't want a BBO table. I know ads are unrealistic but give me a break, clown tier

1718804853438.png
 
At least they didn't use dice chips.

"How do you know you're a chipoholic?"

When you look at a pic of 10 pretty girls bunched around a poker table and your eyes immediately lock onto the stacks of chips sitting on the table....
 
@Tommy do you know what they’re putting on your site? I have no idea what this is supposed to be, but it’s freaking weird.
IMG_0750.png
 
@Tommy do you know what they’re putting on your site? I have no idea what this is supposed to be, but it’s freaking weird.
View attachment 1352518
It's a condition which involves having to go to the bathroom a lot in unpleasant ways. Not sure it's the ad copy I'd have gone with myself but it does at least make some sense in context I guess?

ETA: This is me giving them the maximum credit I possibly can, I still think it's kind of weird to have gone with that.
 
Wow. I think Google has everything bugged. I was just talking about Crohn's and IBS yesterday.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom