MrCatPants
Full House
Unsolicited (?) offer to sell below market value sounds a little too good to be true, and further supports this isnt on the up and up.
Last edited:
I'm leaving on a vacation in the morning, I'll be back next week if you want to PM me what you're asking for.
Enjoy the poop cruise.I'm leaving on a vacation in the morning, I'll be back next week if you want to PM me what you're asking for.
Now to go back and see what this thread is all about.
Maybe it's me, but what I'm struggling with the most is if I was in spacemonkeys shoes I would have likely responded with something along the lines of:
"Holy fuck, I'm appalled and dont even know what to say. I'm mortified. I'll immediately reimburse all funds until we get this sorted. I'm sorry man. Shit."
And then proceed to try to figure out what the hell happened, get details, contact the post office or figure out the claim process, etc.
As a seller it's my responsibility to get the chips to the buyer in good condition, and given doublebooyah's presence, sales history etc, I would never IMMMEDIATELY jump to questioning him back.
But maybe that's just me.. this all just smells wrong.
Very helpful. Thanks for sharing. You covered everything very well.@doublebooyah85 please see above, forgot to tag you
@dennis63 had the same feedbackIf you think through this, the possibility of a USPS worker stealing the chips and then filling the box with paper to the exact weight makes zero sense. It makes more sense to steal the contents and throw the box away and chalk it up to a lost package. Why would a worker go through the trouble of filling the box of paper knowing it’s only asking for trouble because you know the receiver is going to question what happened and make an issue about it?
It requires all the forethought to think to make it the same weight and none of the forethought about what happens after the seller receives a box of paper.If you think through this, the possibility of a USPS worker stealing the chips and then filling the box with paper to the exact weight makes zero sense. It makes more sense to steal the contents and throw the box away and chalk it up to a lost package. Why would a worker go through the trouble of filling the box of paper knowing it’s only asking for trouble because you know the receiver is going to question what happened and make an issue about it?
So it was either shipped like that or DB is lying.
I have had more transactions with DB than I care to admit and have never not once had an issue.
Thieves aren't always the brightest of people.If you think through this, the possibility of a USPS worker stealing the chips and then filling the box with paper to the exact weight makes zero sense. It makes more sense to steal the contents and throw the box away and chalk it up to a lost package.
Thanks for the feedback. Great suggestion.I'm seeing a lot of speculation about shipping weights and integrity and whatnot - and I don't understand the relevance of most of the conversation.
If the seller insists that he packaged the expected items in the boxes as agreed upon, then we as a community must take him at his word since we have no basis to accuse him of anything. Without proof, even the title of this thread is inflammatory IMO.
FWIW, I've interacted with both the buyer and the seller and found both to be upstanding PCFers.
It seems the buyer received 2 boxes that contained reams of paper instead of the chips he expected. That must have been heartbreaking and infuriating to experience that. That sucks.
A couple things jump out at me:
View attachment 1533357
1) Why did this package take 2 weeks to reach it's destination? The shipping label says '3 days'; even a week seems excessive unless it got lost in transit somehow.
2) The package seems to have been at the Sacramento facility for an extended period of time without any movement. That isn't normal.
I think it's pretty binary, either the seller didn't actually package the chips, or you're dealing with a theft situation within the USPS.
If you want my unsolicited opinion, I think the seller as an act of good faith should create an affidavit stating that the chips were packed in good faith with as much information as possible about the time of dropoff, method of payment, etc. and have it notarized before sending it to the buyer. From there, the buyer can take it up with the USPS through the appropriate channels.
@SpaceMonkey420I think it's pretty binary, either the seller didn't actually package the chips, or you're dealing with a theft situation within the USPS.
If you want my unsolicited opinion, I think the seller as an act of good faith should create an affidavit stating that the chips were packed in good faith with as much information as possible about the time of dropoff, method of payment, etc. and have it notarized before sending it to the buyer. From there, the buyer can take it up with the USPS through the appropriate channels.
Don't do that, the paper could be used as evidence.3. Mail the boxes and paper back to @SpaceMonkey420 so he can go to his local police and office to handle it on his end.
Sure - occasional delays by a day or two are normal... but two weeks? Unless there's a natural disaster or some other bullshit going on, this seems excessive.Have you not mailed anything with the usps in the last 2 years lol. I’ve had countless delays.
This is speculative and doesn't really advance the conversation. I don't know how USPS thieves operate but one might surmise the thrill of potentially being discovered is at least part of the game. Maybe the thief - if that's indeed what happened - is in it for more than just the items themselves. Maybe he thinks he outsmarted you. Or maybe he wants you to know you got ripped off. Who TF knows?And as many have mentioned if a usps employee would steal they would just take the package…not put paper in it that is the exact weight of the shipment.
Again - we may not be dealing with the best and the brightest here. Stealing from the USPS is -EV. Any sane, rational person already knows this.And if they did decide to steal, they would do it in a day, not delay the package causing more eyes on the problem.
Dunno. Maybe he took a flyer on a heavier-than-average package and struck gold. Who TF knows?And how did usps employee know the package is valuable?
Dunno. I can't speak to the deal the two of you negotiated nor read anything into the communication channels you used. It's reasonable to speculate that you might be right, especially if you're perceived as deep-pocketed/trusting/etc. But that's not for me to comment on.And why did seller take weeks before to sell me chips above market price via sales ad on pcf, but this time text me below market priced.
I don't know but I'm not sure what you think the seller could learn from following up once the package has left the facility of origin. If you mailed something and 10 days later the buyer hadn't received it, what can you (as a seller) do really? Outside of initiating some type of formal inquiry, I don't know what your expectations were when you asked him to look into it.And why did seller not go to the post office for over 10 days when I asked him to bc the item was delayed.
lol between Gorbash and myself, Booyah has probably traded $50k back and forth with us.
So no, Booyah is not in question here.
I think we do, and I would argue this is why integrity matters. People's actions also play into the equation.My position is this: If he says he packaged the chips as promised then we have nothing else to go on.
So it was either shipped like that or DB is lying.
I have had more transactions with DB than I care to admit and have never not once had an issue.
It seems as though there at least a couple others here who've had negative interactions with the seller. That doesn't bode well for him overall but I always try to take people at face value based on my own personal experience. So IMO, an innocent until proven otherwise approach would serve the community best.I think we do, and I would argue this is why integrity matters. People's actions also play into the equation.
And that’s the rub…
DB is one of the most reliable and trustworthy buyers/sellers on the forum. Targeting him (allegedly) as the potential fraudster in this con was the biggest mistake; I’m not sure there’s anyone here who would ever believe he would swap out chips with a ream of paper just for a few grand.
What proof would satisfy you in this case? Just curious. Short of the seller admitting he scammed it seems this is as much circumstantial evidence as we could ever get.It seems as though there at least a couple others here who've had negative interactions with the seller. That doesn't bode well for him overall but I always try to take people at face value based on my own personal experience. So IMO, an innocent until proven otherwise approach would serve the community best.
Actually, if I want to fraud someone. DB fit the prefect profile to be as a target
An affidavit.What proof would satisfy you in this case? Just curious. Short of the seller admitting he scammed it seems this is as much circumstantial evidence as we could ever get.
Read the room, no one is buying this is even remotely possibly a money grab by Booyah.I plan to file a claim on Monday at the post office, and the police station. I'll share the results once I have them. This situation isn't over. Far from it. It’s been a few hours. I'm of course considering issuing a refund and even selling more chips with JWC acting as escrow since he's nearby and has offered to help. I need some time to think things through, gather my thoughts, and come up with a good solution. Right now the strange request for pictures of the boxes longggg after I sent them, and long after I sent the tracking information yet before they arrived, along with the request for half back immediately, while also seeking a full refund from the credit card, is quite a lot to process in a short few hours to say the least.