That's not what Phil Ivy thinks.....I don’t know Baccarat but since it’s a casino game I assume that the best any strategy can hope to achieve is reducing the EV- as close to zero as possible. But can never be EV+.
lol, yes been there and done that... came around and did it 10 times more... lolJust stay away from the game…….. I have had many nights where I grind out a win from 10 hours of poker and on the way out incinerate that and more in 10 minutes. Game is awesome when you win but the stupidest game on the planet when you can’t pick right.
View attachment 1207577
Betting on the banker is the best odds. Still a loser though (obviously).
craps is a volatile as hell game, but if you take the free odds bet(s) (and why •wouldn't• you?) you significantly reduce the house edge ... in some cases the to under 1%I don’t touch table games like that. But there seem to be a lot of poker players who also play craps.
Yeah, the banker is ever so slightly favored over the player, so they take 5% to still make it a bad bet.And they withhold 5% on winning banker bets, don't they?
Problem is it's hard to find a craps game on the strip under $25 per bet. So if you want to maximize your odds you're betting $25 +$75 to $125 behind the line on each go. Don't even get me started on crapsless craps either...craps is a volatile as hell game, but if you take the free odds bet(s) (and why •wouldn't• you?) you significantly reduce the house edge ... in some cases the to under 1%
From what I know he made his edge on rebates and private deals with the casinos, and not from the game itself.That's not what Phil Ivy thinks.....
Oh he was certainly getting paid from edges, that’s for sure.From what I know he made his edge on rebates and private deals with the casinos, and not from the game itself.