400/800 w 100 ante
Pre:
V1 (18000) limps UTG.
Hero (30000) raises to 3000 with
.
V2 calls from button.
V1 calls.
Limping Villain has a little over 20 bigs. That's usually the perfect size to jam over a raiser. Limping from UTG could be setting up for a play like that, although it could just be a loose passive player who calls too much.
I like a raise to between 2800-3400 in this spot.
Flop (11000)
V1 checks.
Hero leads 2000.
V2 folds.
V1 calls.
I agree with the others on the c-bet. A king is certainly in our range and this board is dry as far as drawing hands go so I expect it to take it down a good percentage of the time. That being said, I think the 2k bet is too small and invites being played back against. Someone with 99 could think they're good here and raise you.
I think 5K is fine to get the job done
Turn (15000)
V1 checks.
Hero bets 5000.
V1 calls.
Hmmmm, well now. the problem we face here is that Villain 1 only started with 18k and has already committed 5K of that to the pot. With the pot size at 15K and his remaining stack at 13K I lean towards a check for pot control. If Villain is a loose/passive type then we avoid paying them off when they have the King here, or potentially scaring them away with another bet when they're behind with a small pocket pair.
Another issue is that if we bet here we make it REALLY hard to find a fold on the river or if we're check-shoved on given pot sizes and the potential for Villain to make that play with a number of smaller pairs we beat.
Well we have to call 8K to win 33K so we're getting more than 4:1 on our money and have to be right 20% of the time to be break-even. Does Villain ever have a 3 in their hand? I usually discount it, but there's a LOT of stupid players out there who would limp call with A3 s00ted and such junk.
Villain check-calling the flop and turn and then jamming the river with Kx also makes sense given they've made a full house.
88 is possible given they might float that flop and then they hit the turn and continue.
Villain could also think a hand like 66-Jacks is good here too, I've seen a lot of crazy plays in my time. In their mind "I HAZ FULL HOUSE, IS NUTZ!"
However, if this particular player is passive, then when someone like that comes out firing it's generally an indicator of strength.
The problem we face her mathematically is are we good approx. 20-25% of the time to make this call break-even or something profitable? It depends on the player, but I think at this point we're essentially locked in given the pot size and I would likely call here without additional info/reads on this particular opponent.