churlbut18
Full House
Re: forced bet, all this means is that first player to act can't check, right? What is the theory behind this? Makes players fold? Increases pot size?We've played it with blinds and I think that's preferable if the group has never played a rotating, force bet structure before. Personally I think it would be a boring game with 2 cards and I think the force betting aspect is one of the rules that makes it such an interesting game. Plus most older players will be very comfortable with force bet games as they were much more common in home games before the NLHE explosion. The board plays either way in the original way the game is spread so that's fine. Making it 5 or 6 betting rounds shouldn't make a ton of difference, but personally I prefer 6.
So I suppose if you're trying to adapt it to be more player-friendly, switch to a blind structure and remove the rotation, but keep it at 4 cards per player and keep the force bet.
Re: 4 cards down, doesn't this raise the same concerns that @courage raised about Super Hold'em earlier in this thread where if you're allowed to play 3-4 hole cards, cooler hands will become abundant?