Mtvernonbryan
Straight
Does GPI patrol this forum you think?
I would assume that they know but as long as it doesn’t hurt their official business, who cares? It would be a big deal if there was a heist of chips that look close to the WSOP chips for instance. That’s a big deal.I guess I’m was wondering if they “patrol” to see if peeps are skirting round the rules to get chips made...
I would assume that they know but as long as it doesn’t hurt their official business, who cares? It would be a big deal if there was a heist of chips that look close to the WSOP chips for instance. That’s a big deal.
But a boat and a circus? They don’t care.
Using that logic combined with the BTP we could make some very sick sets. Now just need to convince them that they should allow it. Sure there would have to be minimums to meet so we couldn’t all get individual sets.Then there is no reason whatsoever to not allow an actual open group buy using the exact same template for any if the Star chips because they are already "out there" and do not infringe on any design for existing casino chips.
Then there is no reason whatsoever to not allow an actual open group buy using the exact same template for any if the Star chips because they are already "out there" and do not infringe on any design for existing casino chips.
Think he was referring to patterns and color selection not mold.Not to be a snob, but I don't think anybody here would want to run a Paulson buy, secret or not, on a RHC mold. It will be THC or nothing.
Okay, maybe I am a snob.
If someone is going to try to run a GPI GB and chooses RHC, their account should be deleted immediately.Not to be a snob, but I don't think anybody here would want to run a Paulson buy, secret or not, on a RHC mold. It will be THC or nothing.
Okay, maybe I am a snob.
Think he was referring to patterns and color selection not mold.
If someone is going to try to run a GPI GB and chooses RHC, their account should be deleted immediately.
Bud Jones are okay. But having the THC option and not choosing it is sacrilege.Or what if they chose Bud Jones
Bud Jones are okay. But having the THC option and not choosing it is sacrilege.
Are they aware of PCF and the craziness the goes on? Probably. Do they care? Probably not.
Think he was referring to patterns and color selection not mold.
You mean these?Dont be so closed minded. Currency molds are pretty sweet as well, or you can go completely custom.
But I also think its incredibly myopic to say THC or nothing.
The amount of financial backing from this community for chips trumps some casinos. We really should just incorporate PCF, make it an official entity, throw bags of cash down, and force GPI to make us chips...Look at the clamor for the Jacks, on the RHC.
While I agree that most prefer THC, RHC has benefits as well...
The last point is also why currency molds would be a bad idea. Many of the Star chips eventually settled as other chips (I for one have relabeled AS $2s as my $ES $5s, and I bought a few racks of ES nickels that were produced as snappers.
- Bigger inlay area for designs that would benefit from the extra space
- Slides in nicely to existing mixed sets
- Relabel possibilities for fracs
Now if GPI allowed "House Mold" chips, I'd be all for a PCF agreed-upon mold, but in the long run, it wouldn't work for mixing in with other existing sets.
Okay, then I'm incredibly myopic. I also have my finger on the pulse of the community when it comes to THC vs. RHC, especially if it's going to be part of a conspiratorial Paulsons buy. There is a clear majority preference which cannot be denied.