jdub
Pair
What are your thoughts on edge treatments? I am not talking about spots or die subs. I am talking about the physical shape of the rolling edge of the chip.
There is also the act of dropping a precise number of chips as you count them out. I like the chamfered edge for this. As you roll your fingers off the bottom of a small stack of chips I find I can handle this style of chip marginally better.
I see that PCFers place a premium on standing a chip on edge. Is that because that shows a vintage chip is in good condition? If a chip was intended to have a chamfer or a fillet, would standing a chip on edge cease to be a concern?
Is there some "real" reason why one edge treatment is better than another? I'm guessing this one is all preference.
- square, like Paulsons
- chamfered, like Milanos
- filleted, like Monte Carlos
- rounded (worn out, like the Majestic Casinos I have on hand)
There is also the act of dropping a precise number of chips as you count them out. I like the chamfered edge for this. As you roll your fingers off the bottom of a small stack of chips I find I can handle this style of chip marginally better.
I see that PCFers place a premium on standing a chip on edge. Is that because that shows a vintage chip is in good condition? If a chip was intended to have a chamfer or a fillet, would standing a chip on edge cease to be a concern?
Is there some "real" reason why one edge treatment is better than another? I'm guessing this one is all preference.