Dramaha 49 vs Dramaha Zero (Discussion) (2 Viewers)

churlbut18

Full House
Joined
Jan 31, 2016
Messages
3,430
Reaction score
6,893
Rewards
189
Location
Central MA
Some thoughts and questions on these two Dramaha variants.

In Dra2maha Zero, the cards likely to make the lowest pips hand in the mit are the same cards that are likely to make the strongest Omaha high hands (Aces & Faces), true? Does this then make scoops more likely?

Conversely, in Dra2maha 49, the cards likely to make the highest pips hand in the mit (Ts & 9s) are not necessarily the same cards that are likely to make the strongest Omaha high hands (Aces & Faces), true? Does this then make scoops more difficult?

It also should be noted that there are only 4 x Ts and 4 x 9s to help make Dra2maha 49 hands but there are 16 Aces and face cards combined to help make Dra2maha Zero hands.

So which game is more fun?

I lean more towards the challenge of Dramaha 49.

IMG_0710.webp
 
Drawmaha49 is one of the best games ever.

Drawmaha0 sucks and only terrible human beings enjoy it. Worse people call it. Totally unrelated but shoutout to @harrysallout.

Anyway, here was my first hand of Drawmaha0 ever at Degen in Dallas last year. I was dealt this. Pre-draw. I'm not biased.
7bP4k0l.jpg
 
I enjoy both versions of the game. Just don't put them back to back in the rotation, or even two games apart in the rotation. A couple of years ago at RIA, I was playing Dramaha 49 in my head when everyone else was playing Dramaha 0.

It was late in the meetup, late in the night, several old fashioneds on board at the time, and yes I torched some money on that particular hand, but they were pretty close in time in the rotation and I totally botched what specific variant we were playing.
 
I saw a reference to @BootySnatcher .

I know, for a fact, that when he and I share a table, and it comes to my dealing any circus game, that Rufus becomes very, VERY animated at my dealing/burning techniques.

He also loves my hair.
 
Disagree. As OP mentioned, I think a scoop is more likely in zero. Of course there are aberrations in both games.

Initially, I preferred 49, but now, if calling one, I'll call zero. More often than not, 49 forces you to choose which half of the pot you're going after.
 
Most often when I see someone draw a new hand, it's because they got in cheap and are just taking a shot. So...

Drawmaha49/Drawmaha0 Buy. You can draw up to 5 cards, but each draw card costs a BB (or some %age of the pot).
 
Dra2maha least favorite circus game, or at least in the very bottom mix (least fav of what’s popular and regularly played).

Highly prefer all other variants, or just Omaha.

Splitting a pot to include half going to a 5 card hand with 1 draw neither feels like pure poker nor circus.

6 handed half the pot is regularly awarded to a pair, with most bad beat or woah moments being something like flush over straight. Oooooo.

A very unbalanced amount of action is pushed specific to board hands, not mitt holdings.

It’s what you call to kill action, when there’s something good on tv and you don’t want to pay attention, or your table is full of octogenarians complaining about the fun, action, information available games.

0/49 both fantastic variants, which one is better is determined by what’s in my hand. The real answer is do you prefer scoopage or split pots.

I like 49 if I have to pick because I want to see every flop of every game, and 49 rewards a much wider range of hands than 0 (albeit likely for half the pot). Who wants to fold Preflop? (Maybe those dra2maha guys)
 
Most often when I see someone draw a new hand, it's because they got in cheap and are just taking a shot. So...

Drawmaha49/Drawmaha0 Buy. You can draw up to 5 cards, but each draw card costs a BB (or some %age of the pot).

Blah

Or, make them pay to see the flop and to draw.
 
Dra2maha least favorite circus game, or at least in the very bottom mix (least fav of what’s popular and regularly played).

Highly prefer all other variants, or just Omaha.

Splitting a pot to include half going to a 5 card hand with 1 draw neither feels like pure poker nor circus.

6 handed half the pot is regularly awarded to a pair, with most bad beat or woah moments being something like flush over straight. Oooooo.

A very unbalanced amount of action is pushed specific to board hands, not mitt holdings.

It’s what you call to kill action, when there’s something good on tv and you don’t want to pay attention, or your table is full of octogenarians complaining about the fun, action, information available games.

0/49 both fantastic variants, which one is better is determined by what’s in my hand. The real answer is do you prefer scoopage or split pots.

I like 49 if I have to pick because I want to see every flop of every game, and 49 rewards a much wider range of hands than 0 (albeit likely for half the pot). Who wants to fold Preflop? (Maybe those dra2maha guys)

I agree with what you are saying about draw (2) maha. That's why I prefer Drawmaha.

PCF, guess which Michinit is likely to draw a new hand in the BB if it's not raised PF and checked on the flop?


I don't know. It isn't me. If I'm playing a drawmaha hand, I'm almost always betting pre if I'm first to act. Have I ever put money in and drew five. Sure, why not!
 
I like split pot games, so I'll play either. But I prefer split pot games that put on emphasis on scooping. Ones where hands are generally only good at one half or the other feel like a waste of time. But that's coming from the POV of someone that generally wants to maximize profitability.

If you are better at split pot games than your opponents, you want to leverage that edge in games where scooping and quartering happen more often. There is still skill in knowing how to maximize a half, but it's less interesting to me.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom