There is actually one unlikely scenario where this could be angled. It's far fetched, but hear me out.
Let's say you and me are heads up. You lead the league and I'm runner up, trailing by one point. This is the final game and the difference between first and second is more than one point, meaning he who wins this battle wins the league.
If winning the league is important to you, but I'm only after the money, then you could offer a chop where I get all the money, and you get none. You have now bought the title, without breaking a single rule.
If we were forced to play it out, we could of course achieve the same thing, but that would be colluding, i.e., breaking rules.
I'm not dissing the method, in practice it probably works excellent, this was just an academic exercise.