Oooh, I'm sorry. Talk to us. Cheat dealing? Collusion? Telekinesis?I'm dealing with this now myself and I'm so fucking pissed.
Oooh, I'm sorry. Talk to us. Cheat dealing? Collusion? Telekinesis?I'm dealing with this now myself and I'm so fucking pissed.
Anyone who believes in Telekinesis, please raise my hand.Telekinesis?
What if someone is making you NOT raise your hand??? -spooky-Anyone who believes in Telekinesis, please raise my hand.
Cheating while dealing. Primarily during draw games. Taking extra draw cards, combining discarded and draws to make better hands.Oooh, I'm sorry. Talk to us. Cheat dealing? Collusion? Telekinesis?
So I just want to get this straight. In a draw game, he would somehow discard more than he would draw and then was able to drop the extra cards without anyone noticing?Cheating while dealing. Primarily during draw games. Taking extra draw cards, combining discarded and draws to make better hands.
Long-time player, friend for just as long.
Caught on my security camera multiple times in one session.
Life-time ban unlocked.
Fuck. I'm sorry man, that has to really hurt, that's a significant betrayal. Have a Sopranos moment, take Big Puss out on a boat?Cheating while dealing. Primarily during draw games. Taking extra draw cards, combining discarded and draws to make better hands.
Long-time player, friend for just as long.
Caught on my security camera multiple times in one session.
Life-time ban unlocked.
No, he'd discard and draw more than he discarded. Then sleight of hand discard again as he's turning his cards over, or palm a card and discard while cleaning up the pot. It was all VERY smooth.So I just want to get this straight. In a draw game, he would somehow discard more than he would draw and then was able to drop the extra cards without anyone noticing?
Incredible. Bold. And yes, it would have to be smooth for no one to catch a move like that.No, he'd discard and draw more than he discarded. Then sleight of hand discard again as he's turning his cards over, or palm a card and discard while cleaning up the pot. It was all VERY smooth.
Obviously a horrible situation, and not to be off topic, but super interesting with security camera on the actual game/players.Caught on my security camera multiple times in one session.
I'm curious about the cheat's reaction too. I'd expect pure denial in a case like mine, where there's no material proof, but with a video it makes no sense to deny.How did you catch him? He accidently forgot to discard properly too many times and you reviewed it? Did he admit the guilt?
Sorry to hear…
Don't worry, Grant will take care of it.Have a Sopranos moment, take Big Puss out on a boat?
Gah.Cheating while dealing. Primarily during draw games. Taking extra draw cards, combining discarded and draws to make better hands.
Long-time player, friend for just as long.
Caught on my security camera multiple times in one session.
Life-time ban unlocked.
Collusion is one of the most insidious forms of cheating. If the colluders make it a point to be careful and subtle,* it can easily go undetected for a long time, even under the watch of cameras and staff in a formal cardroom. Worse even than an opportunist messing with the deck because it has to include a conspiracy of at least two players, i.e., 20% or more of your field is now made up of cheats.That's really shitty @CraigT78 sorry you have to deal with that. I've had instances of collusion that I couldn't prove, but they're long gone from my game. A close friend doing something is devastating.
THEY'LL STEAL YER TIRES AND WHEELS!Collusion is one of the most insidious forms of cheating. If the colluders make it a point to be careful and subtle,* it can easily go undetected for a long time, even under the watch of cameras and staff in a formal cardroom. Worse even than an opportunist messing with the deck because it has to include a conspiracy of at least two players, i.e., 20% or more of your field is now made up of cheats.
Unlike, say, @Anthony Martino's infamous Cubans.
A few of us play regularly at another game. As we were leaving one night my buddy says to me, watch player X at our next game. I think I saw something fishy with his dealing.How did you catch him? He accidently forgot to discard properly too many times and you reviewed it? Did he admit the guilt?
Sorry to hear…
Does "poker" say this? I would probably think that that is not necessarily always the case, but I'm no poker expert.Poker says you shouldn't change your ideal play because of past pots, won or lost. If the math's sound, implied or otherwise, make your play.
Damn. Draw games are ripe for this, everyone is checking their pulls.A few of us play regularly at another game. As we were leaving one night my buddy says to me, watch player X at our next game. I think I saw something fishy with his dealing.
So next game I kept an eye out, didn't see anything suspicious, but the following game I did. I thought I saw him pull his discarded hand back into his hand that included the draw. I wasn't 100% as it was quick, but I made note of the time. The rest of the game I made notes of when this player has "big" hands, such as a boat in bum bum, low card flushes in Archie/Veronica, and other draw games.
When I watched the tape back, it was pretty clear. I made it through about four hours of video and had 4 or 5 examples, which was all I needed to confirm.
The emotional appeal of this is overwhelming because it goes against the notion of trust, or rather betrayal of trust; you don't stick your hand out a second time for a dog to bite you again. I, too, love this scene and movie.A favorite movie scene of mine is from Les Mis, when Valjean, on the run, has just betrayed the priest who sheltered him, assaulting him in order to steal his valuables and run again on his own. The police, having apprehended Valjean, are interrupted by the priest, who insists the stolen goods were gifts, and takes the convict, who he knows only as a betrayer, back home.
My cynical side loves the scene for its insanity and unintentional horror: surely his naive view will doom him, suggests perhaps that he himself has just escaped an asylum. And another part of me - coincidentally related to my gambling side, I think - loves the scene, hopes that he instead was making a rational decision. That maybe the implied odds of the universe supported a semi-bluff - that the worst of us, and in us, can change, evolve. Be worthy of someone lowering their guard. Maybe more than once.
Public shaming…internet shaming…violence. Not necessarily in that order.Damn. Draw games are ripe for this, everyone is checking their pulls.
This isn't voyueristic, but I do really want to know how you handle this discussion with the cheat and your players. You're a respected member and run a regular game, I want to know how to cross this bridge if I ever get to it.
Say what? Math changes based on hand history of past pots?Poker says you shouldn't change your ideal play because of past pots, won or lost. If the math's sound, implied or otherwise, make your play.
He's actually talking about sunken cost fallacy; he's saying, regardless of previous experience, poker is worth playing, even if you run into a cheat, using a context of pokerSay what? Math changes based on hand history of past pots?
If my decision to employ or avoid a certain play is primarily determined by how much it's won or cost me pots recently, I'm playing suboptimally.Say what? Math changes based on hand history of past pots?
Speaking of dogs that bite, I like this moment in this movie.The emotional appeal of this is overwhelming because it goes against the notion of trust, or rather betrayal of trust; you don't stick your hand out a second time for a dog to bite you again. I, too, love this scene and movie.
When I do, I'm usually sleeping on the couch for a while.You guys don't just rip it in based on gut feelings?