so honest opinion.. betting with your head and not with your heart does England deserve to be the favorite in the final against Italy?
I've seen different bookmakers have different teams down as the favourites. For me, there's merit to both being favourites:so honest opinion.. betting with your head and not with your heart does England deserve to be the favorite in the final against Italy?
I've seen different bookmakers have different teams down as the favourites. For me, there's merit to both being favourites:
England: an absolutely huge home advantage; a stronger starting XI on paper (this is very open to debate, however) and bench.
Italy: best team in the tournament so far — by far; play better as a unit than England (IMO); incredible unbeaten run that looks as though it is going to be extremely hard to end; less pressure on them to win this as a nation (the expectation and pressure for England to win, in front of a home crowd, might just get to them).
That's true. However, I think Italy have been far superior to Spain over the course of the entire tournament — and I wasn't entirely convinced by England's performance against Denmark.I actually thought Spain looked better than Italy. I also think England has more athletes.
Also, athletes in what sense, sorry?I actually thought Spain looked better than Italy. I also think England has more athletes.
That's true. However, I think Italy have been far superior to Spain over the course of the entire tournament — and I wasn't entirely convinced by England's performance against Denmark.
My worry is that if England replicate that first half against Denmark on Sunday, Italy have enough quality to get a couple within the first 45 minutes. I'd argue that, from a defensive point of view, this is the first time Southgate's men are going to have to deal with a truly potent attack in this tournament.
Unless they're 100% switched on from the whistle, Chiesa, Immobile and Insigne might have a field day.
Also, athletes in what sense, sorry?
Yeah, I was going to say that about Germany — but I just don't feel as though Werner is firing on all cylinders enough for them to be classed as potent.Perhaps, but I'd argue Germany scored had a pretty potent attack and England shut them down. I mean the only goal they've conceded over the course of the tournament was a 35 yard free kick. As much as I hate to say it as a Liverpool fan, Maguire has been immense.
Ahhhh, gotcha! There are so many brilliant sub-stories within the context of this game — Southgate's team choice being one of the most potentially contentious, like you alluded to. Like you said, the quicker, more youthful players are going to be key to breaking down Italy's defence; personally, I think you have to start Grealish or Foden, potentially both.I think England has more young guys with a ton of speed, that can cause problems. Whether Southgate decides to play them is another story.
I actually thought Spain looked better than Italy. I also think England has more athletes.
Sure, $20?If you wanna throw some coin on England, I'll take Italy, Chippy.
I mean if you’re going to use the transitive property, Germany beat Portugal and England beat Germany…In the end...it's just going to hurt more to lose in the final for England...NO WAY they going to beat Italy.
The hardest match England had to play was Denmark...and it took them 120min.
Belgium won against them and Portugal and Italy beat Belgium fair & square.
Then Italy beats Spain...
Ps. it's obvious that Fifa wants England to win
Want to do another $20 ?I mean if you’re going to use the transitive property, Germany beat Portugal and England beat Germany…
SureWant to do another $20 ?
And should England by some miracle still take the cup...then good on them with all the Covid & self inflicted Brexit sh*it they had to endure
Sure
Sure, $20?
I bet with both (heart 1st, mind you I’m Sicilian and turn Fabio every 2 yrs,) under Mancini Italy are playing a new style of football (for Italy), which complements their defence. Mancini could be on the verge of doing what Cruyff done for Barca’s team in the early 90’s and changing the Italian game for the better.so honest opinion.. betting with your head and not with your heart does England deserve to be the favorite in the final against Italy?
Them: Who are you supporting tomorrow?
Me: Italy
Them: Really? What part of Italy are you from?
Me: Glasgow
View attachment 733961
I really find it odd that people think Southgate has done wonders with England.I bet with both (heart 1st, mind you I’m Sicilian and turn Fabio every 2 yrs,) under Mancini Italy are playing a new style of football (for Italy), which complements their defence. Mancini could be on the verge of doing what Cruyff done for Barca’s team in the early 90’s and changing the Italian game for the better.
Southgate has done wonders with the England team since he was appointed and I only wish we had a Harry Kane.
Gonna be a cracking final.
Well he's taken England to the semi final of the world cup and now the final of the Euros.I really find it odd that people think Southgate has done wonders with England.
He has one of the best squads in the world to work with and hasn't won a trophy yet, and the style of play he's had England playing over the past few years has been completely uninspiring given the talent at his disposal.
I hear ya, but I think that's our problem as a society in Britain: our mentality of "getting far in a tournament is a job well done" is what has actually stopped us from winning trophies in a lot of sports.Well he's taken England to the semi final of the world cup and now the final of the Euros.
And yes the squad is great, but we always have a great squad on paper and end up doing absolutely crap.
So take a bow Sir Gareth Southgate. It's coming home.
View attachment 734173