Negreanu's Roid Rage (2 Viewers)

I mean, they're probably right. I don't buy she's in love or lust with him. He provides financial stability

I get that this thread is an open invitation to bash Negreanu, but this is one hell of a speculative statement.

In all honesty, I can believe your statement of about half the people out there, so I'll give you 50/50, so as long as the pot odds are there, I'd take that action :p
 
I get that this thread is an open invitation to bash Negreanu, but this is one hell of a speculative statement.

In all honesty, I can believe your statement of about half the people out there, so I'll give you 50/50, so as long as the pot odds are there, I'd take that action :p

She loves his money. I have no doubts she is with him primarily for that.
 
True love if ever I saw it. Those two are obsessed with......themselves
200.gif
 
Maybe he was so upset because he knows it’s true. I honestly know nothing about either of them, but usually only hurts when it’s true. Otherwise he’d be like “whatever”. Maybe he thinks it’s true


That was my thought. Deep down he probably realizes why she is with him, but tries to lie to himself and everyone else about it
 
I mean, they're probably right. I don't buy she's in love or lust with him. He provides financial stability

The accusation that the woman you love is only with you because of money is akin to saying that she sleeps around imo - it plays on the same insecurities of being inadequate, or not being loved back in the same way. Personally, if DNeg already had those thoughts or insecurities in the back of his head and someone were to poke that fire, I could see why it would rile him up.

All that said, banning him for that rant is exaggerated imo, but ultimately not surprising given the "cancel culture" that's so prevalent these days.
 
Hit the nail on the head @cpac54 It's BS that his account got banned but the second he threatened to do anything "anally," twitch's hand was forced by the precedent they've set. Any threat of non-consensual sexual things is an instant ban hammer, and twitch has made no distinction between something like this and an actual threat of sexual violence. Insanity. Cancel cancel culture!
 
Hit the nail on the head @cpac54 It's BS that his account got banned but the second he threatened to do anything "anally," twitch's hand was forced by the precedent they've set. Any threat of non-consensual sexual things is an instant ban hammer, and twitch has made no distinction between something like this and an actual threat of sexual violence. Insanity. Cancel cancel culture!

Who said the anal thing was non-consensual? I think we're assuming that guy's kinks, which is very not woke :p


(am I using that right?)
 
I HIGHLY doubt Doug Polk wanted to get Daniel banned. First of all, it doesn't line up with his overall world view given his political tendencies. Second, why would you want one of your favorite people to make fun of banned from the platform you take a lot of your video of him from?

He streams on YouTube as well. Being banned from Twitch isn't going to result in any less footage (unless Daniel stops streaming altogether because of this)...
 
With most things, the truth lies somewhere in the middle here. I feel like Doug fought the good fight with the More Rake is Better crusade. But this subsequent trolling really is nothing more than shock value and hollow entertainment. But since Doug is done with poker in general, he can do little jabs like this with really no repercussions from anyone in the industry. Will he cross a line that Daniel pursues him legally? Remains to be seen, but I give Doug more credit to do something like that.

As for Daniel, I think a parallel (not completely identical mind you) can be drawn between him and Joe Exotic of Tiger King infamy. They both started out as small time in their respective fields, but as their fame and success rose, they needed more and more money to keep up their appearances and lifestyles. People will always try to shoehorn their way into that lifestyle for their own betterment, regardless of the circumstances. Now will Daniel send a hitman to off Doug? With how topsy-turvy 2020 has been, nothing is off the table.

Should Doug leave Daniel alone not having any skin in the game anymore? Maybe, but free speech is there for you to use. Is Daniel a genial person when meeting fans but also two-faced because of his corporate masters keeping his wallet fat (both Stars and GGPoker) and he really has no other way to go through life if he wants to keep all he has? Certainly.
 
He streams on YouTube as well. Being banned from Twitch isn't going to result in any less footage (unless Daniel stops streaming altogether because of this)...
But still, for the first reason, Doug isn't the kind of guy that tries to get people banned.
 
I feel like Doug fought the good fight with the More Rake is Better crusade.

Just curious if you know some of the other facts around this issue. Polk obviously made a video bashing DNegs about the "more rake is better" comment. However, Polk also went on to make t-shirts with the phrase on them. He also paid for a billboard outside the WSOP with the phrase on it. I mean come on, that is just a bitch troll who is going out of his way to bash someone he disagrees with. (For the record, I don't think more rake is better.)
 
With most things, the truth lies somewhere in the middle here. I feel like Doug fought the good fight with the More Rake is Better crusade. But this subsequent trolling really is nothing more than shock value and hollow entertainment. But since Doug is done with poker in general, he can do little jabs like this with really no repercussions from anyone in the industry. Will he cross a line that Daniel pursues him legally? Remains to be seen, but I give Doug more credit to do something like that.

As for Daniel, I think a parallel (not completely identical mind you) can be drawn between him and Joe Exotic of Tiger King infamy. They both started out as small time in their respective fields, but as their fame and success rose, they needed more and more money to keep up their appearances and lifestyles. People will always try to shoehorn their way into that lifestyle for their own betterment, regardless of the circumstances. Now will Daniel send a hitman to off Doug? With how topsy-turvy 2020 has been, nothing is off the table.

Should Doug leave Daniel alone not having any skin in the game anymore? Maybe, but free speech is there for you to use. Is Daniel a genial person when meeting fans but also two-faced because of his corporate masters keeping his wallet fat (both Stars and GGPoker) and he really has no other way to go through life if he wants to keep all he has? Certainly.

In my mind, Daniel sends a hitman who uses an actual tiger after Doug.
I like being in my mind.

But still, for the first reason, Doug isn't the kind of guy that tries to get people banned.

If you go after someone with this fervor, you know it can have consequences for the other person.
Not saying Daniel didn't hurt his own business doing what he did, but the ridiculous poll, the video compilation, etc. are all just Doug riding Daniel's coattails for his own gain and Daniel's detriment.
 
If you go after someone with this fervor, you know it can have consequences for the other person.
Not saying Daniel didn't hurt his own business doing what he did, but the ridiculous poll, the video compilation, etc. are all just Doug riding Daniel's coattails for his own gain and Daniel's detriment.
And Polk had half a brain, he should also realize that his actions can also have consequences that directly affect himself. Or maybe he just thinks he's untouchable.....
 
Just curious if you know some of the other facts around this issue. Polk obviously made a video bashing DNegs about the "more rake is better" comment. However, Polk also went on to make t-shirts with the phrase on them. He also paid for a billboard outside the WSOP with the phrase on it. I mean come on, that is just a bitch troll who is going out of his way to bash someone he disagrees with. (For the record, I don't think more rake is better.)

Daniel never (to my knowledge) publicly recanted, retracted, or flat out apologized for More Rake is Better. If Daniel is too stubborn, prideful, or maybe it's all out fear speaking out against his then meal ticket's business practices, then Doug has every right to put his feet to the fire to show how hypocritical Daniel is / was presenting himself.
 
And Polk had half a brain, he should also realize that his actions can also have consequences that directly affect himself. Or maybe he just thinks he's untouchable.....
In my mind, Daniel sends a hitman who uses an actual tiger after Doug.
I like being in my mind.



If you go after someone with this fervor, you know it can have consequences for the other person.
Not saying Daniel didn't hurt his own business doing what he did, but the ridiculous poll, the video compilation, etc. are all just Doug riding Daniel's coattails for his own gain and Daniel's detriment.
It's not like this is new behavior from Doug though. You can go after someone and still not want them to get banned. Doug has had ample opportunity to accomplish a ban if that was his goal. He has no shortage of content at Daniel's expense.
 
In my mind, Daniel sends a hitman who uses an actual tiger after Doug.
I like being in my mind.
Or maybe the hitman is an actual tiger, but he can talk, like Tony the Tiger from Frosted Flakes wasn't making enough from the TV commercials and turned to a secret double life of murdering people for money.
 
Daniel never (to my knowledge) publicly recanted, retracted, or flat out apologized for More Rake is Better. If Daniel is too stubborn, prideful, or maybe it's all out fear speaking out against his then meal ticket's business practices, then Doug has every right to put his feet to the fire to show how hypocritical Daniel is / was presenting himself.

Except that's not what he's doing. He's ridiculing Daniel for a variety of things and just keeps dragging that 4-year-old cow out of a ditch and slapping Daniel around with it to grab attention. It's telling that if you Google "daniel negreanu more rake", this is what you get:

1595865827507.png


Those are some of the most clickbait cringy titles I've seen on poker vids so far, and all 3 are from Doug.
By the looks of it he tries to keep this crap alive by just rehashing it every single year.

The link below is this one:

https://www.pokernewsreport.com/negreanu-fires-back-at-more-rake-is-better-critics-22647
 
Who said the anal thing was non-consensual? I think we're assuming that guy's kinks, which is very not woke :p


(am I using that right?)
The premise also assumes there is a sexual nature in feeding the teeth anally. Things can be inserted anally without it being sexual, like a thermometer. I don’t think Daniel was threatening to forcefully check the man’s temperature though.
 
The premise also assumes there is a sexual nature in feeding the teeth anally. Things can be inserted anally without it being sexual, like a thermometer. I don’t think Daniel was threatening to forcefully check the man’s temperature though.

The absurdity of the image is getting to me tho :)

Before I rub people the wrong way: I agree that Daniel had plenty other ways of reacting that did not involve inserting anything in anyone's anal or other cavities.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom