Tourney Single table: T25 base T10k or T20k structures & breakdowns (1 Viewer)

5aces

Full House
Joined
Jun 18, 2016
Messages
2,901
Reaction score
3,178
Location
Düsseldorf, Germany
Since I was dissatisfied with the structure of my last home game, I looked around the forum and played a bit with Excel. The aim is to get more consistency/regularity and to find out whether my sets are sufficient for my needs or whether I need to improve them. Next to that the tournament should finish after 3-4 hours, because most players want to play cash game, too.

We are a maximum of 10 players. NLHE is played without ante. I finally allowed rebuys and add-ons up to level 6 (each level 20 min.). Last time we played T20k with 12/12/5/6/2. T10K is possible without the 2 x 5k's. I have two tournament sets (well three, but two are T25 base) with the following breakdowns:

ESST: 25/100/500/1k/5k/25k
  • 120
  • 120
  • 80
  • 80
  • 60
  • 20
AST: 25/100/500/1k/5k/25k
  • 120
  • 120
  • 50
  • 80
  • 50
  • 10
Structure for T20K:
LevelSBBBTime% increaseColor Up
15010020
27515020150%
310020020133%
415030020150%T25
520040020133%
630060020150%Last RB
740080020133%
86001.20020150%
98001.60020133%
101.2002.40020150%
111.8003.60020150%T100
122.5005.00020139%
133.5007.00020140%
145.00010.00020143%
157.00014.00020140%
1610.00020.00020143%
1715.00030.00020150%
1825.00050.00020167%
1950.000100.00020200%

Structure for T10K:
LevelSBBBTime% increaseColor Up
1255020
25010020200%
37515020150%
412525020167%T25
520040020160%
630060020150%Last RB
75001.00020167%
88001.60020160%
91.3002.60020163%T100
102.0004.00020154%
113.0006.00020150%
125.00010.00020167%
138.00016.00020160%
1413.00026.00020163%
1520.00040.00020154%
1630.00060.00020150%

My first thoughts: The ESST set has too many 500's. To respect the time limit, the starting stacks should be T10K base or the T20k structure should needs to be adjusted for increases of around 160%.

What are your thoughts? Reccomendations?
 
Since I was dissatisfied with the structure of my last home game, I looked around the forum and played a bit with Excel. The aim is to get more consistency/regularity and to find out whether my sets are sufficient for my needs or whether I need to improve them. Next to that the tournament should finish after 3-4 hours, because most players want to play cash game, too.

We are a maximum of 10 players. NLHE is played without ante. I finally allowed rebuys and add-ons up to level 6 (each level 20 min.). Last time we played T20k with 12/12/5/6/2. T10K is possible without the 2 x 5k's. I have two tournament sets (well three, but two are T25 base) with the following breakdowns:

ESST: 25/100/500/1k/5k/25k
  • 120
  • 120
  • 80
  • 80
  • 60
  • 20
AST: 25/100/500/1k/5k/25k
  • 120
  • 120
  • 50
  • 80
  • 50
  • 10
Structure for T20K:
LevelSBBBTime% increaseColor Up
15010020
27515020150%
310020020133%
415030020150%T25
520040020133%
630060020150%Last RB
740080020133%
86001.20020150%
98001.60020133%
101.2002.40020150%
111.8003.60020150%T100
122.5005.00020139%
133.5007.00020140%
145.00010.00020143%
157.00014.00020140%
1610.00020.00020143%
1715.00030.00020150%
1825.00050.00020167%
1950.000100.00020200%

Structure for T10K:
LevelSBBBTime% increaseColor Up
1255020
25010020200%
37515020150%
412525020167%T25
520040020160%
630060020150%Last RB
75001.00020167%
88001.60020160%
91.3002.60020163%T100
102.0004.00020154%
113.0006.00020150%
125.00010.00020167%
138.00016.00020160%
1413.00026.00020163%
1520.00040.00020154%
1630.00060.00020150%

My first thoughts: The ESST set has too many 500's. To respect the time limit, the starting stacks should be T10K base or the T20k structure should needs to be adjusted for increases of around 160%.

What are your thoughts? Reccomendations?
I recommend standard blind levels.

25/50
50/100
75/150
100/200
150/300
200/400
300/600
400/800
600/1200
800/1600
1000/2000 or 1200/2400
1500/3000
2k/4k
3k/6k
....
 
You are calculating your blind increase percentages incorrectly. Doubling the blinds is a 100% increase, so going from 25/50 to 50/100 is a 100% increase (not 200%). Going from 50/100 to 75/150 is a 50% increase (not 150%) -- divide the total increase in blinds by the previous total blinds amount to get the increase percentage (75 ÷ 150 = 0.5, or 50% in that last example).

If wanting to finish a single-table 200BB tournament in under 4 hours with 20 minute blind levels, you will need to use a relatively aggressive structure similar to this:

L1 25/50 (--)
L2 50/100 (100%)
L3 75/150 (50%)
L4 125/250 (67%)
remove T25 chips
L5 200/400 (60%)
L6 300/600 (50%)
L7 500/1000 (67%)
L8 800/1600 (60%)
L9 1300/2600 (63%)
remove T100/T500 chips
L10 2000/4000 (54%)
L11 3000/6000 (50%)
L12 5000/10000 (67%)
L13 8000/16000 (60%)

For 10k starting stacks, begin with L1 (25/50, which is 200bb) and play should finish by L11 3k/6k (3:40 plus breaks).

For 20k starting stacks, begin with L2 (50/100, also 200bb) and play should finish by L12 5k/10k (also 3:40 plus breaks).

An adequate T25-base set for T10k/T20k stacks (12/12/5/6/x) would contain:

120 x T25
120 x T100
50 x T500
75 x T1000 (15x for color-ups)
45 x T5000 (5x for color-ups, 20x for re-buys)

No T25k chips are needed.
 
Since I was dissatisfied with the structure of my last home game, I looked around the forum and played a bit with Excel. The aim is to get more consistency/regularity and to find out whether my sets are sufficient for my needs or whether I need to improve them. Next to that the tournament should finish after 3-4 hours, because most players want to play cash game, too.

We are a maximum of 10 players. NLHE is played without ante. I finally allowed rebuys and add-ons up to level 6 (each level 20 min.). Last time we played T20k with 12/12/5/6/2. T10K is possible without the 2 x 5k's. I have two tournament sets (well three, but two are T25 base) with the following breakdowns:

ESST: 25/100/500/1k/5k/25k
  • 120
  • 120
  • 80
  • 80
  • 60
  • 20
AST: 25/100/500/1k/5k/25k
  • 120
  • 120
  • 50
  • 80
  • 50
  • 10
Structure for T20K:
LevelSBBBTime% increaseColor Up
15010020
27515020150%
310020020133%
415030020150%T25
520040020133%
630060020150%Last RB
740080020133%
86001.20020150%
98001.60020133%
101.2002.40020150%
111.8003.60020150%T100
122.5005.00020139%
133.5007.00020140%
145.00010.00020143%
157.00014.00020140%
1610.00020.00020143%
1715.00030.00020150%
1825.00050.00020167%
1950.000100.00020200%

Structure for T10K:
LevelSBBBTime% increaseColor Up
1255020
25010020200%
37515020150%
412525020167%T25
520040020160%
630060020150%Last RB
75001.00020167%
88001.60020160%
91.3002.60020163%T100
102.0004.00020154%
113.0006.00020150%
125.00010.00020167%
138.00016.00020160%
1413.00026.00020163%
1520.00040.00020154%
1630.00060.00020150%

My first thoughts: The ESST set has too many 500's. To respect the time limit, the starting stacks should be T10K base or the T20k structure should needs to be adjusted for increases of around 160%.

What are your thoughts? Reccomendations?

I mean, if you're trying to finish up on time to make room for the cash game, why not do this 10k game/structure? And end rebuys when you color up the 25s. It should end around level 11 +/- a level, so 3-4 hrs. You could even skip level 1. I don't see why you couldn't use either set.

Or so what I do, and make all levels 0 min with 0 starting stack, then you can start the cash game right away :)
 
I adopted the infos from @BGinGA into my Excel and corrected the percentages.

T10K - 3:40 h plus breaks
LevelSBBBTime% increaseColor Up
15010015
2751501550%
31002001533%
41503001550%T25
52004001533%
63006001550%RB Range 33BB
74008001533%RB Range
86001.2001550%RB Range 17 BB
98001.6001533%
101.1002.2001538%
111.5003.0001536%
122.0004.0001533%T100/500
133.0006.0001550%
144.0008.0001533%EOT
156.00012.0001550%
168.00016.0001533%

T20K - 4:00 h plus breaks
LevelSBBBTime% increaseColor Up
1255017
25010017100%
3751501750%
41002001733%
51503001750%T25 / RB Range
62004001733%RB Range
73006001750%RB Range
84008001733%
96001.2001750%
108001.6001733%
111.1002.2001738%T100
121.5003.0001736%
132.0004.0001733%EOT
143.0006.0001750%
154.0008.0001733%

If 15-17 minutes are not enough to finish one round per blind:

T10K 3:40h plus breaks:
LevelSBBBTime% increaseColor Up
15010020
2751502050%
31252502067%T25
42004002060%
53006002050%RB Range 33BB
65001.0002067%RB Range 17 BB
78001.6002060%
81.2002.4002050%
92.0004.0002067%T100/500
103.0006.0002050%
115.00010.0002067%EOT
128.00016.0002060%
1312.00024.0002050%
1420.00040.0002067%
1530.00060.0002050%
1650.000100.0002067%


T20K 3:40h plus breaks:
LevelSBBBTime% increaseColor Up
1255020
25010020100%
3751502050%
41252502067%T25
52004002060%Last RB
63006002050%Last RB
75001.0002067%
88001.6002060%
91.3002.6002063%
102.0004.0002054%T100/500
113.0006.0002050%EOT
125.00010.0002067%
138.00016.0002060%
1413.00026.0002063%
1520.00040.0002054%
 
Last edited:
You are calculating your blind increase percentages incorrectly. Doubling the blinds is a 100% increase, so going from 25/50 to 50/100 is a 100% increase (not 200%). Going from 50/100 to 75/150 is a 50% increase (not 150%) -- divide the total increase in blinds by the previous total blinds amount to get the increase percentage (75 ÷ 150 = 0.5, or 50% in that last example).

If wanting to finish a single-table 200BB tournament in under 4 hours with 20 minute blind levels, you will need to use a relatively aggressive structure similar to this:

L1 25/50 (--)
L2 50/100 (100%)
L3 75/150 (50%)
L4 125/250 (67%)
remove T25 chips
L5 200/400 (60%)
L6 300/600 (50%)
L7 500/1000 (67%)
L8 800/1600 (60%)
L9 1300/2600 (63%)
remove T100/T500 chips
L10 2000/4000 (54%)
L11 3000/6000 (50%)
L12 5000/10000 (67%)
L13 8000/16000 (60%)

For 10k starting stacks, begin with L1 (25/50, which is 200bb) and play should finish by L11 3k/6k (3:40 plus breaks).

For 20k starting stacks, begin with L2 (50/100, also 200bb) and play should finish by L12 5k/10k (also 3:40 plus breaks).

An adequate T25-base set for T10k/T20k stacks (12/12/5/6/x) would contain:

120 x T25
120 x T100
50 x T500
75 x T1000 (15x for color-ups)
45 x T5000 (5x for color-ups, 20x for re-buys)

No T25k chips are needed.

I know, the percentages are wrong (I used the auto fill and don't know the correct formel to substract 100%).
EDIT: To correct that was easier than expected.

Thank you for all the infos you share in this forum @BGinGA
 
Last edited:
You are going to have a problem with that L11 4500/9000 if you have already removed the T500 chips after L8. :)
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom