"One of a kind" RACK -Read rules (1 Viewer)

Well since the last rack above was $2.
image.jpg
 
Sterling casino lines
$5, secondary $25, secondary $100, roulette

Ziegler's Rendezvous
Blue ncv, red ncv, $20

Someone show me more racks of these.
 

Attachments

  • 20220807_203136.jpg
    20220807_203136.jpg
    142.5 KB · Views: 142
  • 20220807_210509.jpg
    20220807_210509.jpg
    146 KB · Views: 143
  • 20220807_211633.jpg
    20220807_211633.jpg
    179 KB · Views: 152
  • 20220807_202637.jpg
    20220807_202637.jpg
    195.5 KB · Views: 144
  • 20220807_210152.jpg
    20220807_210152.jpg
    209.4 KB · Views: 135
I"ve got 84, so I'm close to booting you
@davislane
I think the faces may belong here
Not Paradise Bingo unfortunately



THCjF62.jpg

DsEzD92.jpg

a53Yuk9.jpg


@DMack
Any other full racks at your place?
I gotta disqualify myself already actually :ROFL: :ROFLMAO:

It sounds like between you and another hunter a third rack could be combined together
Gotta disqualify myself with the orange already

Plus another 150+ are out there I never knew just not together

I’ll try with the green instead
Those colors together though :love:
6D04BCC3-43A2-46FB-8B05-1CB4B97358E1.jpeg
 
It took me 9 years, 11 months, and 27 days to complete a rack of the thin-denomination $2 Monterey Club chips. It turns out that my quest for a rack of the thick-denomination $2s wouldn't take much longer, as last Friday I received enough $2s to complete the rack. That rack clocked in at 10 years, 2 months, and 22 days. My quest for a rack of $20s and a rack of $3s continues...

IMG_5722.JPG


IMG_5723.JPG


IMG_5727.JPG


Edit: To clear up any confusion, the “thick-denomination” chips are the chips in the front, where the printing of the $2 is noticeably thicker. I strongly suspect that those chips are from the original 1973 order, and they are the most worn chips. So the “thick-denomination” chips are actually the thinner chips. The “thin-denomination” are in the back, and I suspect are from the 1974 and 1975 orders. There are some differences even amongst the “thin-denomination” chips. The differences could be related to wear and tear, but it’s also possible that they are differences between the 1974 and 1975 orders. Either way, the different thickness of the printed $2 is readily identifiable, and I’m as certain as I’ll ever be that the thick-denomination chips are from the 1973 order while the thin-denomination chips are from the later two orders.
 
Last edited:

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom