You’re missing the point... the guy with $30 has little to NO power to capitalize on timed strategic betting (bluffing). Hard to bluff a monster stack. Also when the $30 stack gets a monster hand, they’re only making $30...
And since you’re essentially playing for stacks every hand, it narrows your range.
I guess there are different ways to look at it. After all being bullied is subjective... I always find it funny when people buy in for large amounts and then the table exclaims "oh no thats not fair now he will bully the table..."
This is really the sentiment I am talking about and it is simply not accurate. Playing poker is just about exploiting other people's tendencies and you can do this with a big stack or a small stack. The idea that having a small stack puts you at a disadvantage is not true and this has been seen clearly with the trend of short stacking players online.
If the guy with the big stack is playing loose and aggressive then one needs to adjust their game accordingly (ie play tight). If the guy with the big stack is playing ultra tight waiting for a big hand to get all in then you can maybe get by with some well timed bluffs.
Similarly, if a short stacked player is loose and aggressive going all in frequently then one also needs to tighten up.