Sold Horseshoe Cleveland Quarters (1 Viewer)

i have 360 still available, they are Lucky Derby $2's with labels from @Gear.

Looking for $100/rack shipped!!

 

[Psypher1000]

Just curious - were those milled at all, or just labeled over?

 

[AllinBallin]

Those are pretty sweet!

 

[GoStumpy]

Labelled over.. milling costs ~$2/chip

-edit-

My mistake, milling is $1/chip

 

[superchromix]

sharp edges on those 5s

 

[GoStumpy]

sharp edges on those 5s

Those are my "Great condition" $5's I use in play, the mint rack is even better

 

[Psypher1000]

Labelled over.. milling costs ~$2/chip

Some people self-mill. Didn't know if you did that or not.

 

[GoStumpy]

Just thought I should mention, the condition/wear is almost identical to the Horseshoe $1's, as well they are same spot pattern as the HS $1 & $5, with plain black spots, so the spot progression is actually quite good! Just ask @detroitdad

 

[detroitdad]

I endorse these quarters. They flow very well with the set and they are in similar used condition (which is a good thing imo).

I have another rack on the way

 

[chkmte]

Labelled over.. milling costs ~$2/chip

I think it's actually $1/chip if you're referring to @Gear pricing. However, I thought it used to be like $0.15/side. Perhaps I am mistaken.

 

[GoStumpy]

I think it's actually $1/chip if you're referring to @Gear pricing. However, I thought it used to be like $0.15/side. Perhaps I am mistaken.

Ahh, I see I was thinking of the "Full inlay replacement" price.

Still though, cost of shipping to and from, milling, price of inlays, original chip, they would definitely be in the $2/chip range

 

[jskel]

Is that the hot stamp showing through? Is this something that is common when labeling over?

 

[GoStumpy]

It photographs easily, when there is light reflecting you can see a bit of the hotstamp's outline. In play and in use it's barely noticeable... ask @detroitdad how noticeable it is for him

 

[Gear]

Labelling over hotstamps can be tricky. If you use a label that is thin enough to fit in the available recess depth, it's likely too thin to completely hide the hotstamp ridges and lumps. Conversely, if you use a label thick enough to hide the hotstamp completely, it's probably too thick for the inlay depth (and it may have adhesion problems since it'll only stick to the high spots, the ridges and lumps themselves.)

That said, for used chips, labelling over hotstamps without milling or scraping can work, if you don't mind a little bit of lumpiness that you can feel, or sometimes see in the right light.

To be clear: These are unlaminated labels, 0.10 USD each. I also offer hotstamp removal (milling) which is 1.00 USD per chip for circular inlays, 1.50 USD per chip for shaped inlays. This includes laminated labels (0.15 USD each, two per chip) and the work of applying them to the chips.

 

[bsdunbar1]

Awesome looking .25's, nice choice to go with that set. Nicely done.

 

[GoStumpy]

Is that the hot stamp showing through? Is this something that is common when labeling over?

Just to clarify, looking at the photos you can see a little bit of outlines... but also look at how horribly scratched up the faces are of the $1's and especially $5's.. they don't look nearly that bad in person unless you are specifically staring closely at one.. same goes for the slight ridges and lumps of the hotstamp. iPhones take some pretty incriminating photos, heh