Home game promos (3 Viewers)

[meatshield]

Havent seen many threads about it recently so just wanted to gauge what fun home game promos exist out there.

Recently I have been doing High hand jackpots for my cash games (.25/.50) where I initially started buying buying $5-10 gift cards to various fast food places or stores as part of a Mystery High Hand bonus every hour. Each card in an unlabeled envelope the winner has to pick.

Then discovered fronting extra money on my part to fund the bonus wasn't sustainable on top of providing food and whatnot. So next games I took $1 from every pot over $2 and each hour the winner gets the accumulated.

When the game runs to 2 tables, it's hard to manage collecting a buck from the table I'm not at and it seems to cause some grumbles amongst a few players taking money away.

So just looking for new ideas for interesting promos I can implement to keep it interesting but not be a detriment to the game

 

[Poker Zombie]

Havent seen many threads about it recently so just wanted to gauge what fun home game promos exist out there.

Recently I have been doing High hand jackpots for my cash games (.25/.50) where I initially started buying buying $5-10 gift cards to various fast food places or stores as part of a Mystery High Hand bonus every hour. Each card in an unlabeled envelope the winner has to pick.

Then discovered fronting extra money on my part to find the bonus wasn't sustainable on top of providing food and whatnot. So next games I took $1 from every pot over $2 and each hour the winner gets the accumulated.

When the game runs to 2 tables, it's hard to manage collecting a buck from the table I'm not at and it seems to cause some grumbles amongst a few players taking money away.

So just looking for new ideas for interesting promos I can implement to keep it interesting but not be a detriment to the game

We always have some sort of bonus. For cash games, I find it easiest to simply take a bite out of the initial buy-in. If you know how many players are attending, you know how much to rake for the bonus so you come out even.

25¢/50¢ probably a $100 buy-in to start? So your first buy-in gets you $95 in chips. 2 tables, I'll guess 15 players. That's $75 for gift cards. Rebuys get the full amount, so once you cover the initial buy-in you are done with the "rake".

I've never heard my players complain, though I make it clear that there is a pull off the top for the bonus. If you have extra finnicky players, you can always allow a $105 buy-in.

 

[springbox]

Do players like the promos? I think your options are:

A) Fund it yourself
B) Rake pots to fund it
C) Take a door fee ($5?) to fund it
D) No promo

A is obviously unfair to you and just a giveaway. B&C is up to player preference. I would personally prefer C over B, people don't like seeing $ pulled out of pots and it's something you'll need to keep track of all night. Technically you could also make C optional and only have players who pay in have a shot at winning the high hand, but that has its own issues. If players don't particularly seem to care about the promos, you can always nix them entirely. If you keep them, definitely pay cash for B or C, I would hate to pay a $$$ rake to get a gift card I may or may not want.

 

[PepperPaul]

We just do an optional $10 per person high hand that pays every two hours. I just run one table, so $100 or $110 in the pot. No qualifier except both cards most play so we start keeping track of flush or better and pay at the end of the two hours. If people don’t want in, they don’t pay and can’t win, but most people usually participate.

I have a friend who also runs a game and does the same, except he has a full house qualified and if no full house hits the pot carries over to the next time slot.

 

[TheWhat]

We go $50 + $5 for our initial Buyin at .25 / .50

Half goes to High Hand, then other half goes to a Progressive Pot. We normally play 8 handed, so $20 to High Hand, and the Progressive can get High, but after 2 games is effectively a Buyin.

 

[BaroneSanitation]

I sell show em chips for $1 one use during the night. Can rebuy more if you want. All the funds go into our bad beat jackpot that everyone can see the running total on.

 

[TheYeti]

 

[kach33]

At my 50¢/$1 game we do an optional high hand bonus with a $10 scratch off ticket to enter. We set a time to settle and keep track of the winning hand on the dry erase board. The scratch offs add a little extra to the pot as there’s always that chance to win more (although I can’t say I’d feel great about the ticket I bought in with was a million dollar winner lol) My players seem to like it

 

[jxfan]

I sell show em chips for $1 one use during the night. Can rebuy more if you want. All the funds go into our bad beat jackpot that everyone can see the running total on.

This is a neat idea, might try it myself

 

[RagingAZN]

View attachment 1507777

Sorry to hijack but just so I’m understanding condition 4, the following hand WOULDN’T qualify because PLAYER 1 would only be using one of their hole cards to make the best 5 card hand?

BOARD:
PLAYER 1:
PLAYER 2:

But if PLAYER 1 had an Ace in his hand, then it would qualify as they would have Quad 2’s with an Ace kicker and using both hole cards?

 

[philhut]

Sorry to hijack but just so I’m understanding condition 4, the following hand WOULDN’T qualify because PLAYER 1 would only be using one of their hole cards to make the best 5 card hand?

BOARD:
PLAYER 1:
PLAYER 2:

But if PLAYER 1 had an Ace in his hand, then it would qualify as they would have Quad 2’s with an Ace kicker and using both hole cards?

Good careful read. It's all about the (*).....

4. The winning and losing hand use both hole cards.

 

[TheYeti]

Sorry to hijack but just so I’m understanding condition 4, the following hand WOULDN’T qualify because PLAYER 1 would only be using one of their hole cards to make the best 5 card hand?

BOARD:
PLAYER 1:
PLAYER 2:

But if PLAYER 1 had an Ace in his hand, then it would qualify as they would have Quad 2’s with an Ace kicker and using both hole cards?

Correct on both accounts. The winning and losing hand must use both hole cards to qualify for the bad beat jackpot.

 

[detroitdad]

None

I put out good bourbon and scotch to drink and I occasionally cook dinner for the guys.

 

[cosmokramer]

But why would quad 2s with a 3 kicker not qualify?

 

[philhut]

But why would quad 2s with a 3 kicker not qualify?

Due to condition #4 per above.

If you see 3 of a kind on the board then you are more likely to call with any full house. This is given the bad beat jackpot of 70% is potentially greater than a all in bet giving the player a form of "insurance". This edge would alter play and make the bad beat jackpot easier to obtain. This is just one example of why 2 hole cards must be played.

 

[TheYeti]

But why would quad 2s with a 3 kicker not qualify?

In the example given, the best 5 card hand player 1 can make is quad 2s with an A kicker which does not use both hole cards.

 

[cosmokramer]

But, in regards to the wording, the best 5 card hand with both hole cards would still be quads and beat the full house, so actually all of your 4 points would be met?!

 

[NotRealNameNoSir]

But, in regards to the wording, the best 5 card hand with both hole cards would still be quads and beat the full house, so actually all of your 4 points would be met?!

No, it must use both hole cards. USE, means it is the best possible 5 card hand. That includes the Ace kicker. The wording is correct:
2222A beats 22223.

Think about it, if the board was 222 2 3, would you be okay chopping if you have AA and your opponent has 55?

 

[cosmokramer]

In regards to the wording, i still disagree, imo point 4 is met. 22223 beats 222QQ ‍
The Points don’t specify that it needs to be overall best possible hand and „use“ in no way implies that.
If it read „must be the best possible hand and use both hole cards“ i‘d agree.

But, semantics

 

[springbox]

In regards to the wording, i still disagree, imo point 4 is met. 22223 beats 222QQ ‍
The Points don’t specify that it needs to be overall best possible hand and „use“ in no way implies that.
If it read „must be the best possible hand and use both hole cards“ i‘d agree.

But, semantics

22223 can't be the winning hand, because the hand that won was 2222A. 2222A does not use both hole cards.

 

[cosmokramer]

22223 can't be the winning hand, because the hand that won was 2222A. 2222A does not use both hole cards.

Now that wording convinces me, i‘ll shut it
Guess all the omaha and scrotum discussions over the years about what cards play what hand wired my thinking differently

 

[Poker Zombie]

22223 can't be the winning hand, because the hand that won was 2222A. 2222A does not use both hole cards.

This is correct.

The rules of Hold'em indicate that a player's final hand is "the best possible 5-card hand" made up of the community cards and the player's two hole cards. While I understand @cosmokramer's point, and it would suck to lose because of the 3 being counterfeit by an ace (or any larger card) the option to play the 3 does not exist according to the rules of holdem.

 

[cosmokramer]

This is correct.

The rules of Hold'em indicate that a player's final hand is "the best possible 5-card hand" made up of the community cards and the player's two hole cards. While I understand @cosmokramer's point, and it would suck to lose because of the 3 being counterfeit by an ace (or any larger card) the option to play the 3 does not exist according to the rules of holdem.

And that would have convinced me too