History of Big Top Poker Chips (3 Viewers)

[Josh Kifer]

How many tens hundreds of thousands did they collectively profit on the resale market? It would be an easy conviction if Paulson wanted to press charges.

 

[gopherblue]

View attachment 1292390

This thread is more fun than pulling on a piece of yarn sticking out of Audrey’s ass.

 

[Josh Kifer]

This thread is more fun than pulling on a piece of yarn sticking out of Audrey’s ass.

Well, I found the arm of the sock monkey.... Only one way to get the rest out.....

"Sir... This is a Wendy's....."

 

[BarbaraBooey143]

Not to be pedantic, but there is no universe where a US Attorney would consider wasting resources on this. Now, a civil suit? Perhaps. But as noted in this thread, there are legion reasons why that would almost assuredly never happen. Sorry to break it to you, but your fever dreams of being Paulson’s star witness are just that. Sorry, Matlock…case dismissed.

View attachment 1292381

Like I said. We are in agreement they have openly confessed to felonies. Now they are at the mercy of Paulson and the US government to do as they wish.

 

[TheRealTeddyKGB]

Like I said. We are in agreement they have openly confessed to felonies. Now they are at the mercy of Paulson and the US government to do as they wish.

 

[BarbaraBooey143]

Like I said. We are in agreement they have openly confessed to felonies. Now they are at the mercy of Paulson and the US government to do as they wish.

Civil suit will "Almost assuredly never happen"? You might be deluding yourself. Depends on how seriously Paulson values its reputation.

 

[Chippy McChiperson]

Like I said. We are in agreement they have openly confessed to felonies. Now they are at the mercy of Paulson and the US government to do as they wish.

I don't think anyone's agreed about that.

 

[NotRealNameNoSir]

 

[BarbaraBooey143]

I don't think anyone's agreed about that.

@gopherblue

What do you think "waste of resources" is code for?

 

[TheRealTeddyKGB]

I don't really care either way.

Dude. This post was dead for 5 years until you brought it back to life & now you won't stop trying to convince people you're right . Don't tell me you don't really care because that's BS.

Also good luck trying to work with people here buying or selling chips in the future. You're gonna need it.

 

[BarbaraBooey143]

Dude. This post was dead for 5 years until you brought it back to life & now you won't stop trying to convince people you're right . Don't tell me you don't really care because that's BS.

Also good luck trying to work with people here buying or selling chips in the future. You're gonna need it.
View attachment 1292417

Everyone implicitly agrees I'm right. They committed fraud. They could easily be convicted of felonies. But nobody gives a shit. That's the end of the thread.

 

[RichMahogany]

Everyone implicitly agrees I'm right. They committed fraud. They could easily be convicted of felonies. But nobody gives a shit. That's the end of the thread.

The thread ended a long time ago but you refuse to let it truly die.

You’ve made your point, or not.

Just stop

 

[RichMahogany]

Oh, you are also right about one thing @BarbaraBooey143, no one gives a shit.

So again, please stop

 

[BarbaraBooey143]

Oh, you are also right about one thing @BarbaraBooey143, no one gives a shit.

So again, please stop

I stopped a couple days ago... Then noticed a bunch of quotes and replies.

 

[RichMahogany]

*insert facepalm gif here*

 

[LowerBama1714]

I stopped a couple days ago... Then noticed a bunch of quotes and replies.

 

[Jimulacrum]

I'm just surprised this dude's account is still functional. I figured he'd have been nuked as soon as he admitted to using the site to compile evidence to help outside parties sue or prosecute forum members (and ownership?).

 

[gopherblue]

Like I said. We are in agreement they have openly confessed to felonies. Now they are at the mercy of Paulson and the US government to do as they wish.

Civil suit will "Almost assuredly never happen"? You might be deluding yourself. Depends on how seriously Paulson values its reputation.

@gopherblue

What do you think "waste of resources" is code for?

Everyone implicitly agrees I'm right. They committed fraud. They could easily be convicted of felonies. But nobody gives a shit. That's the end of the thread.

Err. No. Just stop it.

 

[MrRossKeys]

Just curious........... did our favorite user ever answer my question?

 

[Jacks]

 

[gopherblue]

All of PCF looking at Babs and his delusions of grandeur…

 

[Jimulacrum]

Err. No. Just stop it.

View attachment 1292429

Love the "implicitly agrees." So we agreed without actually agreeing?

If that's a thing, then I think we can implicitly agree that Paulson implicitly agreed to implicitly agree to the implicit agreement that they wouldn't sue.

Case closed.

 

[Budha]

Everyone implicitly agrees I'm right. They committed fraud. They could easily be convicted of felonies. But nobody gives a shit. That's the end of the thread.

 

[BigJackJones]

Raise your hand if you implicitly agreed that felonies were committed in the creation, purchase and sales of BTP chips.

 

[Josh Kifer]

The thread ended a long time ago but you refuse to let it truly die.

You’ve made your point, or not.

Just stop

I'm having a great time tho.

 

[TheRealTeddyKGB]

I'm having a great time tho.

This post made my day/month

Baquaman

 

[chicubs1988]

Federal prosecutor here. I've actually prosecuted wire fraud and mail fraud and I will also say that this would probably be a low priority for most offices (I can't speak for the DOJ as a whole obviously). That being said, it would depend on the specific facts as to whether it even amounted to criminal fraud in the first place. I don't know what information was provided to GPI, but my guess is that as long as fraudulent licensing, forged documents, or bribery of an employee weren't used, it may not even amount to something criminal. It might be a civil suit, but then the question becomes, "Why would GPI want to make it public that their internal controls/security allowed this to happen?"

 

[Saoliver]

Federal prosecutor here. I've actually prosecuted wire fraud and mail fraud and I will also say that this would probably be a low priority for most offices (I can't speak for the DOJ as a whole obviously). That being said, it would depend on the specific facts as to whether it even amounted to criminal fraud in the first place. I don't know what information was provided to GPI, but my guess is that as long as fraudulent licensing, forged documents, or bribery of an employee weren't used, it may not even amount to something criminal. It might be a civil suit, but then the question becomes, "Why would GPI want to make it public that their internal controls/security allowed this to happen?"

@BarbaraBooey143 is getting lawyered so hard up in here. So hard.

 

[Goldfish]

Lets do this..
View attachment 1291587

Did someone say GIFs? Let’s get to work…….

 

[Josh Kifer]

Federal prosecutor here. I've actually prosecuted wire fraud and mail fraud and I will also say that this would probably be a low priority for most offices (I can't speak for the DOJ as a whole obviously). That being said, it would depend on the specific facts as to whether it even amounted to criminal fraud in the first place. I don't know what information was provided to GPI, but my guess is that as long as fraudulent licensing, forged documents, or bribery of an employee weren't used, it may not even amount to something criminal. It might be a civil suit, but then the question becomes, "Why would GPI want to make it public that their internal controls/security allowed this to happen?"

What are you? Some sort of lawyer or something. Psshhh...

......oh...wait....