ngmcs8203
Flush
This community would be devastated:
I don’t understand how eliminating card protectors would improve the game for anyone. They exist to…um…protect a player’s cards.
I know what you mean, but he's advocated in the past against the GTO-robots. He's always been the most talkative at the table and has warned that if poker gets too boring (sunglasses/hood/stalling) we'll lose rec players. But I don't know, sunglasses are way less popular these days; maybe more worry about card marking/cameras? Don't know.First two would advantage the best players... him. Rec players disadvantaged.
Who died and put him in charge?This community would be devastated:
#3 is kind of ridiculous and I'm surprised he would even suggest that. they need some rules/procedures in place for the "leave one chip behind bet" but definitely not that one.
3 is bananas. I understand that its annoying when players leave a single chip behind and it must be frustrating to accidently call instead of "all-in", but 90% is a silly threshold. Maybe "when betting an amount 90% or greater, all remaining chips have to be clearly visible to the entire table" or something.
How about we make crime illegal first, mister.Lol, ridiculous.
How about banning tiny cameras instead.
I think its to prevent shinnersyeah. i saw this. #3 is kind of ridiculous and I'm surprised he would even suggest that. they need some rules/procedures in place for the "leave one chip behind bet" but definitely not that one. And no clue what #4 is trying to accomplish??? 1 and 2 are a lot more reasonable.
This solution SUCKS…The solution is easy. Just go to electronic tables. Eliminates any chance of peeking cards and nobody places anything on the table but drinks.
I have no issue with #1 & #2 but I think this is only to benefit the Pro more than the Rec which is why DNegs vote for these changesPoker rule changes I would vote for:
1. No face covering of any sort.
2. No Sunglasses.
3. If a player bets 90% or more of their stack, it is an all in.
4. No card protectors allowed on the table.
We love poker chips here. Bringing a couple of our favorite chips to a game to use as card protectors lets us expand the joy of our hobby! It also helps justify the expense as we are “using” the chips.If anybody wants to kill 20 minutes, he just released this video on his thoughts about the problems with players leaving 1 chip behind. He acknowledges that he doesn't have a great solution, including the 90% rule.
And down with card protectors! I love it. People should leave their favorite chips and lucky charms and random toys in their pocket where they belong! You always have a stack of casino issued card protectors right in front of you - use those and get your junk off the table.
Tires Count...
idk, I think he makes a lot of very compelling pointsIf anybody wants to kill 20 minutes, he just released this video on his thoughts about the problems with players leaving 1 chip behind. He acknowledges that he doesn't have a great solution, including the 90% rule.
And down with card protectors! I love it. People should leave their favorite chips and lucky charms and random toys in their pocket where they belong! You always have a stack of casino issued card protectors right in front of you - use those and get your junk off the table.
#5: No shuffling your chips or otherwise making obnoxious noises"
We love poker chips here. Bringing a couple of our favorite chips to a game to use as card protectors lets us expand the joy of our hobby! It also helps justify the expense as we are “using” the chips.
Oh he does.idk, I think he makes a lot of very compelling points
How often has a chip from your stack been left on your cards when you shove all in?You always have a stack of casino issued card protectors right in front of you - use those and get your junk off the table.
He said sunglasses are necessary at the WSOP final table because the lights are so bright.Also, I like to point out #2 is that the last time DNegs manage to win a WSOP title (he had his "lucky" shade on) so it might harm him more than not.