I'd like to put a set (fake internet points if you can guess which one) into play for a (T25-based) T10K this week but the breakdown is 100/100/100/100/100. We usually have 2 tables with maybe 6-8 rebuys, so let's say 30 stacks maximum. I was thinking:
8/8/6/6/0 x 12
4/4/7/6/0 x 1
0/0/4/3/1 x 5
0/0/0/5/1 x 1
0/0/0/0/2 x as needed
That leaves 7 T1K and plenty of T5Ks for coloring up. The per-table breakdown would be (assuming 6 of the first stack listed and 2 of the third)
48/48/44/44/2 - 8 players per table, most likely
48/48/44/44/6 - 10 players per table, possible
and going to 2 T5K chips for rebuys immediately. I realize this is heavy on T500s but intuitively to me the 8/8/6/6 stacks are close enough to 8/8/4/7 and there are enough of them that I assume this will be okay in terms of change-making, etc . . . ? Also the T500 is the pretties chip in the set so having more of those isn't such a bad thing
8/8/6/6/0 x 12
4/4/7/6/0 x 1
0/0/4/3/1 x 5
0/0/0/5/1 x 1
0/0/0/0/2 x as needed
That leaves 7 T1K and plenty of T5Ks for coloring up. The per-table breakdown would be (assuming 6 of the first stack listed and 2 of the third)
48/48/44/44/2 - 8 players per table, most likely
48/48/44/44/6 - 10 players per table, possible
and going to 2 T5K chips for rebuys immediately. I realize this is heavy on T500s but intuitively to me the 8/8/6/6 stacks are close enough to 8/8/4/7 and there are enough of them that I assume this will be okay in terms of change-making, etc . . . ? Also the T500 is the pretties chip in the set so having more of those isn't such a bad thing