Knowing many of them will cash in the max $220 ...that is just 20 reds and 20 whites...easy to count out
I'm sure you meant 40 reds and 20 whites.
Knowing many of them will cash in the max $220 ...that is just 20 reds and 20 whites...easy to count out
Yes that(n) :thumbsdown:I'm sure you meant 40 reds and 20 whites.
Looking for opinions? I’d say $40-$80 is reasonable for a .25/.50 game. But like everything, it depends on the game and the crowd. If I’m playing Holdem with a competitive crowd, I’d probably buy in for $80, maybe even $100 if everybody’s playing deep. If I’m playing PLO or circus games, I’m probably more likely to buy in for $50 or $60, because I know it’s probably all going into the middle pretty quickly.So for 0.25/0.50 a $50-100 is reasonable, and 0.50/1 $100-200?
So for 0.25/0.50 a $50-100 is reasonable, and 0.50/1 $100-200?
No Limit or Pot Limit I want about 100 big blindsSo for 0.25/0.50 a $50-100 is reasonable, and 0.50/1 $100-200?
Why not just let them "top off" to the max buy-in of $300?ill be hosting a $1/$2 game within the next month. my rules are as followed: Min/Max 100/300. You can reload or add-on for a max of $200 but that option is only available if you have less than $100 left in your stack. (keeps people within the range of Min/Max ) Rebuy's are the same : 100/300
Why not just let them "top off" to the max buy-in of $300?
Why not just let them "top off" to the max buy-in of $300?
Making change with cash is a pain in the ass.
(It's why we use chips.)
Under the rules he has listed, a player can't add on until he has less than $100. That makes zero sense.Making change with cash is a pain in the ass.
(It's why we use chips.)
Why not just let them "top off" to the max buy-in of $300?
The local casino used to have $60 min at the $1/2 game
That's crazy for a $1/$2.
Makes much more sense. Good luck with the game!They can but most don't "top off" for example - $213 dollars. They would do an amount of most likely in increments of 20 dollars. but yes if they had $40 dollars left they can Add on for $260. so Max isn't really $200 its just a rule of thumb. They can Add on to a total amount of $300.
$200-800 we play a monthly "deepstack" game, it's fun and good practice to sit with more than 100bb sometimes
You want to hear really crazy?
I played at the Viejas Casino near San Diego one time and the MAXIMUM buy-in for a 1/2 game was $60.
GTFO. serious?
You want to hear really crazy?
I played at the Viejas Casino near San Diego one time and the MAXIMUM buy-in for a 1/2 game was $60.
Was that so no one could walk out with more than 3 barrels of these beauties?:You want to hear really crazy?
I played at the Viejas Casino near San Diego one time and the MAXIMUM buy-in for a 1/2 game was $60.
Under the rules he has listed, a player can't add on until he has less than $100. That makes zero sense.
You want to hear really crazy?
I played at the Viejas Casino near San Diego one time and the MAXIMUM buy-in for a 1/2 game was $60.
You can reload or add-on for a max of $200 but that option is only available if you have less than $100 left in your stack.
Why not just let them "top off" to the max buy-in of $300?
Making change with cash is a pain in the ass.
(It's why we use chips.)
I don't understand this statement? There isn't anyone making change.
I have $67 left. I want to top up to the max of $300. I have three $100 bills. I get $233 in chips, and $67 in cash back.
To me, that's a pain in the ass.
To be honest, though, it never really comes up... in my game, I have no rules on top-ups; you can have $120 and decide to add $60. Whatever.